![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our flight to Lansing, MI Wednesday was a good example of how XM
satellite weather can really help the average GA pilot. The plan was to fly due East to Valparaiso, Indiana, just east of the bottom of Lake Michigan, and then hang a left toward Lansing. We've made this trip a dozen or more times, and the weather around the bottom of the lake can be "interesting" -- no matter what time of year. When we took off, we knew there was an area of iffy weather to the north, drifting to the east. Knowing that we had "live" weather on board made all the difference, since we could constantly update the situation as we went. After some experimentation with the 496, we have found that it's possible to view cloud tops at various discrete altitudes. Since we had a very high scattered to broken layer (up around 10K) and a low scattered to broken layer (down around 2K), this feature was remarkably useful. With Mary working the XM, we were able to discern where the "edge" of the low stuff was with remarkable precision. (And, in reference to our post of a few days ago, the low stuff WAS being depicted on the satellite mosaic... Maybe they heard my complaint? :-) I stayed on "the clear side" of the lower broken layer for 40 miles, but this was gradually pushing us south of our intended course. Without XM, I would have maintained this course along this "edge" indefinitely. WITH XM, however, Mary was able to show me that this was a "dead end" course that would take us directly into some storms ahead in Illinois. She was able to see that all we needed to do was hang a left, cut across the lower widely scattered layer, and within 15 miles we'd be in clearer air on the north side of the layer. This is not something I would ever have done, before XM, since there would be no good way to know how far the scattered layer continued, or if it were improving or worsening ahead. With XM, however, it proved to be child's play, and we were able to fly all the way to Valparaiso without incident. Once we made the hard left turn toward Lansing, the scattered layer disappeared, and all was right with the world. Of course, on the opposite end of the spectrum, our flight home from Lansing has proved to be something that XM couldn't really help. I'm typing this in the FBO at South Bend, Indiana, where we landed yesterday afternoon after running into an absolute wall of crap. Because there are so few reporting stations in NW Indiana (strangely, they are RADIO AWOS's, but they don't appear in computerized weather depictions, including XM), we were proceeding in the "blind" (relatively speaking) with XM. The few reporting stations in the area were reporting good VFR ahead -- but we were running into wildy variable conditions, running from good VFR to just above minimums -- often within just a few miles. Just south of South Bend conditions dropped to absolute zero, with visibility and ceilings well below anything we're comfortable flying in, so we did a 180 and landed for the night. Now, the weather is terrific here, but absolute crap in Iowa, predicted to lift within the hour. As always, we've had a great time while we were here (found a fantastic steak house called "222" downtown, near the quite nice Holiday Inn), but I have to admit that the IFR ticket would have been a deal changer on this particular flight. (No ice or storms around now, just bad visibility and ceilings to the west. Although, in truth, Iowa City has been below even IFR minimums much of the morning.) Bottom line: XM is great for picking your way around popcorn storms. It doesn't do much good when bad weather is widespread over a large area, with no fronts to keep things moving along. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
I've been flying along the Lansing to Valpariso leg this spring and summer... The weather is rarely as good as 'interesting' at the right turn of the lakeshore... It's usually just this side of scummy - and sometimes the other side... This is the 'all turns to the left' weekend for us and the Fat Boy will be doing the, Saginaw - Toledo - Port Clinton - Cleveland - Lake Erie - Windsor - Saginaw, route... The left turn at Lake Erie can be interesting also... Yup, ya gotta get the rating... Unless of course you enjoy staying at other peoples' inns.. denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Of course, on the opposite end of the spectrum, our flight home from Lansing has proved to be something that XM couldn't really help. I'm typing this in the FBO at South Bend, Indiana, where we landed yesterday afternoon after running into an absolute wall of crap. That Bermuda Triangle known as Northern Indiana was the vortex that captured my V35 for three weeks on our return trip from Colorado (and The Alexis Park Inn). Starter went on the ground at Starke County, Indiana. Stay away from that area! ![]() Sorry to read of your weather delay. -- Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in news:1155313065.551853.143550
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: fter some experimentation with the 496, we have found that it's possible to view cloud tops at various discrete altitudes. Since we had a very high scattered to broken layer (up around 10K) and a low scattered to broken layer (down around 2K), this feature was remarkably useful. With Mary working the XM, we were able to discern where the "edge" of the low stuff was with remarkable precision. (And, in reference to our post of a few days ago, the low stuff WAS being depicted on the satellite mosaic... Maybe they heard my complaint? Can you give a quick run down on how you were able to do this?? The only thing I've been able to do is zoom out enough to see the acutal satillite picture of the clouds, but I was unable to find at what level the tops were, other then perhaps the different shades of white/grey which I was unable to discern the meaning of. I know there is a section marked "echo tops" but I thought that was the top of storm cells.... -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Because there are so few reporting stations in NW Indiana (strangely, they are RADIO AWOS's, but they don't appear in computerized weather depictions, including XM), we were proceeding in the "blind" (relatively speaking) with XM. The few reporting stations in the area were reporting good VFR ahead -- but we were running into wildy variable conditions, running from good VFR to just above minimums -- often within just a few miles. Just south of South Bend conditions dropped to absolute zero, with visibility and ceilings well below anything we're comfortable flying in, so we did a 180 and landed for the night. Just like what I had coming home from AirVenture. Put this in your memory file for "localized weather conditions" for future flight. This is the kind of knowledge we have lost and continue to lose with the flight service consolidation. Time was, the FSS briefers who had spent years at their facility would tell you about the local conditions in their area. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you give a quick run down on how you were able to do this??
The only thing I've been able to do is zoom out enough to see the acutal satillite picture of the clouds, but I was unable to find at what level the tops were, other then perhaps the different shades of white/grey which I was unable to discern the meaning of. I know there is a section marked "echo tops" but I thought that was the top of storm cells.... Yep, that's the page. We cycled through the "echo tops" and it perfectly displayed the high stuff (by selecting the 12000? foot range), the clear areas in between, and the low stuff (by selecting the lowest selection -- 3000? feet?). Supposedly this should only display reflections from precip, but it worked well to depict the clouds -- this time, anyway. By the way -- we're back in Iowa City. Everything lifted around 11:30 AM, and we were back in the office by 3 PM. It was still pretty scuzzy from Joliet west to Iowa City, but I never had to drop below 2000 MSL, and visibilities ranged from 5 to 10 miles all the way -- which was a damned-sight better than Indiana was yesterday! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote: but I have to admit that the IFR ticket would have been a deal changer on this particular flight. He's weakening... First a Garmin, then the i. rating. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dan Luke" wrote: but I have to admit that the IFR ticket would have been a deal changer on this particular flight. He's weakening... First a Garmin, then the i. rating. Mary is the person who will really determine whether or not Jay gets his instrument rating. Unless Mary was pulling my leg, she doesn't seem at all comfortable with the idea of being in clouds. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary is the person who will really determine whether or not Jay
gets his instrument rating. Unless Mary was pulling my leg, she doesn't seem at all comfortable with the idea of being in clouds. You're right -- Mary has ZERO interest in flying herself into the clouds. However, she would have no problem flying IFR with me. She just doesn't want the responsibility at this phase of her life. In most other ways, it WILL be up to Mary when I ultimately get the IR, since she'll have to carry the load at the hotel for several months while I hit the books again. I doubt that's going to happen any time soon. It's a shame we didn't wait five more months to buy the hotel, back in '02, and this conversation would be a moot point. I'd simply be another non-current instrument pilot, like most of the guys at my airport... ;-) But it's all good. As long as we can continue to have great times whenever we *very* occasionally have to spend the night somewhere due to bad weather, we'll be happy campers... Hell, Mary and I can have fun anywhere -- even South Bend, Indiana! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In most other ways, it WILL be up to Mary when I ultimately get the IR,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You're right Dan, he is weakening. 'bout time :-) since she'll have to carry the load at the hotel for several months while I hit the books again. I doubt that's going to happen any time soon. I'd bet you could knock it out in fairly short order Jay. Yep, it does take a major time commitment and I can imagine the impact to your time at the Inn. BTDT...just not while trying to run a business. It's a shame we didn't wait five more months to buy the hotel, back in '02, and this conversation would be a moot point. I'd simply be another non-current instrument pilot, like most of the guys at my airport... ;-) True, it does take commitment to keep instrument currency...but...heck, that's just another excuse to go fly, right? Still, I'd bet your statement about "most guys at my airport" and being out of instrument currency is fairly common. One of those sad but true things. -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL-Instrument Airplane Arrow N2104T "To become a Jedi knight, you must master a single force. To become a private pilot you must strive to master four of them" - Rod Machado (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Home Built | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products | FlyBoy | Owning | 61 | May 16th 05 09:31 PM |
Interesting Weather Site | Michael 182 | Piloting | 5 | February 1st 05 04:28 PM |