|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 19th 04, 03:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Meigs Class D Airspace
previous threads about Meigs Class D. I called my local FSDO (Grand
Rapids, MI) who had no idea why the Class D is still depicted on the Chicago Sectional, and suggested I call NACO. I did and left a message. I got a call back this AM from Tony Selve at Naco who says the airspace will not be depicted on the next Chicago charts, due in September. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 48 | October 5th 04 12:46 PM |
| Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 03:29 AM |
| AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 07:12 PM |
| airspace G | Jim Anglin | Home Built | 8 | February 23rd 04 12:29 AM |
| vfr corridors through class B airspace | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | November 3rd 03 12:28 AM |
Threaded Mode