![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone tell me why vacuum power is popular for certain instruments? I
cannot see any special reliability of a vacuum pump as opposed to an electric motor. The only reason I can think of is historical, in that many small aircraft have traditionally not had on-board electrical systems beyond what was required by the engines themselves. However, a vacuum pump seems no more reliable to me than an alternator. What are the reasons behind it all? I see lots of descriptions of how the instruments work, but none that explain or justify the choice of vacuum over electrical power. It also seems that vacuum is subject to partial failures, whereas an electrical failure is usually much more obvious. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wet vs Dry Vacuum Pump | Fastglasair | Owning | 7 | December 17th 04 11:46 PM |
Wet Vacuum Pump | smackey | Owning | 6 | February 24th 04 07:03 PM |
Reverse Vacuum Damging to Instruments? | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 8 | February 16th 04 04:00 AM |