![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? I'm the navigator on my dad's flights Thanks Nigel Reeves |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi all Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? Nigel Reeves The plastic/metal one will be more fun, always work and let you see how the solution to drift and time calculations arise. It will also develop your skills in navigation. You will be developing the skills that all the great aviators used when they made pioneering flights. Electronic calculators are boring. By the way, in NZ we are not allowed to use electronic calculators for our piloting exams ! I think its great that your dad is trusting your skills in navigation to help him fly cross country. Cheers Mark. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rule 1: ALWAYS TRUST YOUR GPS (IF YOU HAVE ONE). The same rule applies
out here in South Africa, But it is always useful to know. Thanks Nigel Reeves |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? If you can only get one, I would recommend a small metal E6B (e.g. http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/sep/523). The electronic version is much easier to use, but the metal one always works. It's unlikely it will ever break and it's batteries will never run down. Additionally, for some problems, you get a better idea of what's going on with a mechanical version. The mechanical versions run about US$25 for a decent one (there are cheaper ones, but don't waste your money). The electronic versions run about US$75 for a good one. And if you're going to spend the money on an electronic version, spend it on a good one that you'll be happy with. The electronic version will also be more accurate, but don't let that fool you. It won't make your flight any more accurate. Factors like inaccurate winds aloft forecasts or measuring error when laying out your course on the sectional add a lot more error than the small amount of error you will get from trying to read between the marks on the E6B. So don't let that be a factor in your decision making. -m -- ## Mark T. Dame ## CP-ASEL-IA, CFI-A, AGI ## insert tail number here ## KHAO, KISZ "Software Independent: Won't work with any software." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 6:59 am, "Mark T. Dame" wrote:
wrote: Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? If you can only get one, I would recommend a small metal E6B (e.g.http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/sep/523). The electronic version is much easier to use, but the metal one always works. It's unlikely it will ever break and it's batteries will never run down. Additionally, for some problems, you get a better idea of what's going on with a mechanical version. I still carry my paper one (although my GPS actually has one built in as well). Its interesting that you point out that the electronic ones are easier to use. I've not found that to be the case. In fact, when a student arrives for flight training with me and they pull out the electronic E6B, I cring a bit. I have yet to see any student who can pull out their electronic E6B in flight, after I've given them a diversion or something, and do anything other than just fiddle with it. Even when they do come up with the answer it takes forever. I'm not going to be able to become an expert on every electronic E6B out there but when I've looked at what my students show up with I find that I cannot understand how to use it without spending an hour or so with the manual. However, I can show a student how to calculate most of what they need to be able to do with the manual E6B in about 15 minutes. -Robert, CFII |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark T. Dame wrote:
The electronic version will also be more accurate, but don't let that fool you. It won't make your flight any more accurate. Excellent point. I always get a kick out of airspeed or fuel requirements on my calculator to the tenth or hundredth. If a few tenths of a gallon of usable fuel, or a tenth of a knot, make a difference on my flight, I need to slap myself. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-07-27 00:56:10 -0700, "
said: Hi all Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? I like the metal ones. The plastic E6Bs are junk. The metal E6B takes a little longer to learn than an electronic one, but not much. Once you learn to use it, it is much faster than the electronic versions. Besides, the electronic versions pretend to a level of accuracy they really do not have. It gets silly when you see readouts down to a second either way. They remind me of the old saw "Measure it with a calipers, mark it with a grease pencil, cut it with an axe." -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 3:56 am, "
wrote: Hi all Whats best for simplicity and price? The Metal/Plastic E6B or the electronic one? I'm the navigator on my dad's flights Thanks Nigel Reeves Is this for checkride/exam purposes or for real flying? I have not used the E6B in over ten years for anthing. For in-flight purposes you should be able to mentally estimate most of the numbers. For ground planning, use a computer. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I haven't used an E6B since I took delivery on my Garmin 296. I'm sure that proves me terribly lacking in something or other, but there it is! Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 forthcoming from HarperCollins www.flyingtigersbook.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electronic copy of manual for Nimbus-3DT | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | January 26th 20 12:38 PM |
Electronic Flight Manual | Christopher H Thorpe | Soaring | 0 | January 12th 06 12:12 PM |
Whats for Lunch? | culverflyer | Soaring | 16 | January 9th 05 10:31 PM |
Whats an RT-24/APX-2 ? | Tasp | Military Aviation | 1 | September 15th 04 12:47 PM |
Whats up with Avid | Deckard | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 10:08 AM |