![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A day or two ago the first official report on the Oshkosh Mustang
accident was issued, and not surprisingly at this point, it said little. However, the local paper again cited a witness/pilot who put the blame on the pilot who survived. He said that the plane in front should not have touched down first. That makes sense to me--whoever touches down first is going to lose speed much faster than any plane still in the air. But then I wondered two things: 1) how would the guy in front KNOW when the guy behind him has touched down? 2) since the nature of the accident suggests that the pilot who died was directly behind the other plane, why wasn't he laterally separated as well? When two planes land in formation, it seems to me they are always separated in two dimensions, not just one. Is there any rule or custom concerning which side of the runway the lead plane would take in landing? I'm certainly not interested in apportioning guilt or in any way dishonoring the dead, but I'd like to learn, and I'm particularly concerned that Casey Odegaard (lead plane) is getting the blame in the paper when the blame may not be all his. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another fatal accident | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 06 11:50 PM |
Fatal accident in Italy | 2cernauta2 | Soaring | 1 | April 4th 06 05:50 PM |
Fatal accident near Wenatchee, WA | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | June 27th 05 01:54 AM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
Hawaii Fatal Accident | Rocky | Rotorcraft | 0 | July 25th 03 03:01 PM |