A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sightseeing Regulations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 19th 07, 02:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Sightseeing Regulations

A few months back, I was on an airline flight coming home to LGA in the
most clear day I had seen in months! (Haze in NY is quite common.) The
plane flew over Lady Liberty and right up the Hudson River at what had to
be about 3000'. It's a pretty standard approach, and happens frequently,
but it's not always so low, and not always on such a beautiful, clear day
with a perfect view.

Anyway, I tried to point out the view to as many passengers near me that I
could, but the pilot remained silent about it.

When I was deplaning I said to the pilot that I thought that on such a
perfect VFR day he should announce the wonderful view over the intercom,
and he said that he's not allowed to talk on the intercom below 10,000'.

Has anyone heard of such a thing?

I didn't really think much of it until the night before last when I came
home from St. Louis. This time, the pilot was kind enough to point out the
statue and the incredible view of NYC on approach. So obviously this is not
an FAA thing.

Seems to me like flying used to be exciting and pilots would feel like
tourguides as they described their routes and pointed out the wonders of
the world to their passengers as they landed in different cities. And I
guess there are still some "old school" pilots who still feel that way.

But I think it's a shame that this it's all taken for granted now.
Certainly visitors (and even residents who have circled "the Lady" at 500')
appreciate the beauty of the sights. Almost every time I fly home through
LGA and we do that approach, if the weather is clear, and people catch a
glimpse, fingers start to point and people from the other side of the plane
try to sneak a peak too.

Why would some wise-ass pilot try to pass off his own ambivalence as some
reg or policy?


"This country needs an enema."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Charity and Sightseeing Regulations Larry Dighera Piloting 10 May 7th 07 03:21 AM
Short sightseeing trips near KAPA - Denver? Longworth Piloting 10 August 28th 05 11:03 PM
Changing course to do sightseeing - practical (with clearance) when IFR? Mitchell Gossman Instrument Flight Rules 6 July 9th 04 07:38 AM
FAA to End part 91 Sightseeing flights? Vaughn Rotorcraft 7 November 2nd 03 01:20 AM
New UK Regulations Soaring 5 October 2nd 03 12:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.