![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Appreciate this groups insight
![]() When getting VFR advisories into an uncontrolled field, when and how ought one transition to the CTAF. Currently, I tune in and monitor the CTAF on COM2, and if ATC doesn't tell me "squawk VFR, freq change approved" by about 5 miles out, i get antsy and cancel advisories. The theory is that I really want to be focused on other traffic on the CTAF, and the advisories aren't always that helpful "numerous targets in the pattern...". Also, there is sometimes a lot of chatter on the ATC frequency, making it easy to miss a CTAF transmission even when monitoring it. Should I just cancel advisories proactively 10 miles or so out so that Ican focus totally on the CTAF? Or should i really let ATC take the first step, with the assumption that they know best their abilitiy to provide quality advisories, and they'll drop me over to the CTAF at the most optimal time. I'd be interested in the different opinions on this... What if i only had one COMM (like the C152 I on occassion fly). Second question. Check out http://skyvector.com/#29-15-3-2383-2408, i was flying into MGJ (Orange County) at 6500 from the E, getting advisories from NY Approach. Actually the flight from the Ebrought me right over the SWF (Stewart) Class D airspace, which has a 3000 ceiling. So I was in my VFR descent actually right over Stewart, being careful and then some not to bust the 3000 ceiling until i was well clear of the Class D, which gave me all of 2 miles to get from about 3500 to the 1400 TPA at Orange County. Rwy 3 was active at Orange County, so i overflew the field, went about 1-2 miles to the West, descended aggressively and entered the left downind on a 45, still descending 1200 FPM right up to the downwind turn. Somewhere right over the field, NY cancelled and i turned over to the CTAF. OK, on reflection this did not strike me as the safest way to do things. For one, the aggressive descent just outside of the downwind, in a field that has a fair amount of turbine traffic flying (wider and higher) patterns right where i was descending through. For another, i would have rather been at TPA a fair bit out, so that i could have the benefit of monitoring the pattern at eye level. Ideas on how to do this better? Some thoughts that come to mind a * Be more patient, go to the west even more, say 4-5 miles, give it time for a gentler descent, and enter on the 45 at the TPA. * Be more patient, and navigate to the N or S to avoid Stewart's Class D altogether. * Could I ask NY approach to talk to Stewart tower and see if i can get permission to descend through Stewart's Class D. Might they do it and would that be legal anyways -- or would i have to talk directly to Stewart tower? * Or would i just ask to cancel flight following in the vicinity of Stewart, talk to their tower, tell them the deal and ask to descend through their Class D enroute to MGJ? There's large turbine traffic low all over the place here... Any other ideas? Thanks all! Tman... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight Questions | Jed | Piloting | 32 | September 15th 07 03:12 PM |
GPS approach in VFR wx at uncontrolled field | BobKK47 | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | March 13th 07 03:06 PM |
Closing IFR flight plan at uncontrolled field | paul kgyy | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | February 9th 06 02:27 PM |
Boeing Field/Mus. Of Flight Trip | gatt | Piloting | 0 | August 5th 04 08:12 PM |
Position and Hold at uncontrolled field | dave | Piloting | 42 | February 26th 04 01:25 AM |