![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Lockheed Martin AFSS main computer system was shut down
overnight March 11-12 to do a software upgrade. The main FS21 computer at LM should have been shut down for only a couple of hours overnight, but it ended up down for about 24 hours because the fix they were adding was not right. As has happened several times in the past, the upgrade resulted in a full collapse of the main fS21 system, and briefers had to work with the backup computers. They were also told during a system wide telcon that even though some data was not reliable, to go ahead and use it anyway. But it gets worse. The FAA has "secret shoppers" that call LMAFSS for briefings, and then score the service that LM provides. This is known as the "Performance Metric 2A Evaluation." Ahhh, thanks Marion...a performance based system at last! Blakey's term in office makes the Hindenberg look like a popcorn fart. But anyway...part of the Lockheed Martin bonus is based upon this scoring system on how the work is being done. These are RANDOM EVALUATIONS done by FAA hired auditors that determine part of the payment for the contract. Guess what happened during the unscheduled outage? Someone at Lockheed Martin CALLED THE FAA OFFICE IN CHARGE OF THESE EVALUATIONS, AND ASKED THAT THE EVALUATIONS BE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE COMPUTERS WERE FIXED. Worse still, the FAA managers running the evaluations AGREED to stop the evaluations until the computers were fixed. Whaaaaaaa? Yeah, it really happened. Shouldn't the FAA be evaluating the service, NO MATTER THE CONDITIONS of the computers LM is using? Weren't those 24 trouble-filled hours part of the time LockMart agreed to provide Flight Service? Why in God's name would you NOT evaluate your service provider when they were doing their absolute WORST work? Translate to air traffic---The New York TRACON is having a lot of operational errors and separation difficulties. Am I to understand that the Manager should call the FAA in Washington and ask them to suspend further evaluation of the facility until performace improves? (Marion and other dullards: the correct answer is "no.") It's no wonder the Administrators Fact Book for this year has the following disasterous data: Jan-Sept 2006 17,705,000 FSS operations Jan-Sept 2007 8,200,000 FSS operations NINE MILLION PILOTS HAVE GIVEN UP. (And how IS that search for Steve Fossett coming, anyway?) NINE MILLION PILOTS HAVE given up on service. Given up on safety. Given up on reliability. And given up on their government holding their best interests at heart. Nice job, AOPA. You led your members to SLAUGHTER on this one. If the President of AOPA had the integrity God gave your average hamster turd he would resign in disgrace. He turned his membership into "Client Number One," and they got front-of-the-line priveleges for a good, clean screwing. (Bragging note because, yes, Virginia, I do have an ego: I correctly fought the privatization sons-of-bitches from long before my first day in office to my last. In fact...some controllers will recall a particularly impassioned speach I gave at the microphone at one of our conventions...92, 94, 96, I don't recall. All I remember is how it ended: "Pick up a brick and fight.") Now, get this. The guy that ran this service into the ground after the FAA gave it to LM was Dan Courain, who just stepped down from the project, supposedly to retire. He was the Lockheed guy in charge from October 2005, until very recently. Rumor has it he just got a $1.5 Mill BONE-US. For what.....destroying an integral part of the national airspace system? For stealing pensions and retirements from 2500 deserving federal employees? For cutting "customer traffic" in half, as your "customers" give up on your stupid ass and rely instead on the fat black weather guy on the Today Show? Sort of like the FAA manager that told Southwest it was OK to delay inspections. Specialists nationwide got an internal email on Saturday from Ron Petro (he replaced Dan Courain as the head of the AFSS program) acknowledging that things were not so great the day the computers went down; however, they worked to fix the problem. Mr. Petro went on to state in that internal email that the FAA agreed to suspend the evaluations until the problems were fixed. This is an internal LM email to all employees through their communications director, and here's the salient portion: March 14, 2008 Communique' from Ron Petro to AFSS Specialists Hi everyone, I know that I don't have to tell you guys that from a system standpoint yesterday was very disappointing. The problem with the system turned out to be a memory issue or what the technical folks call a memory allocation/deallocation error. In any case it was finally resolved late yesterday. We have put a team in place ti do a complete bottom up review of the test system to understand how a problem like this could make it through test and not show up until we were in production. At one point in the morning, it looked pretty gloomy. The service level was abysmal and we were getting pounded. By mid morning you folks had jumped in and brought things back under control. You did a superb job and I'm proud to be a part of a workforce that pulls together like you do. You demonstrated what a team is all about! You immediately went to back-up using all available tools to take care if the pilots. Many of you stayed over and others came in just to work during a difficult time. We had every available person certified as a pilot weather briefer on position including QAS and PPS. As a result, we ended the day in pretty good shape. The service level yesterday was 80.3% with only a 4% abandon rate both of which are well within the APL goals. We actually received several compliments from pilots on your professionalism and attitude during what was a difficult and stressful period. The FAA did agree to suspend 2a evals during this period but not before you folks had several passes with very high scores. Also during this period wehad two individuals who passed their National Weather Service (NWS) evals. The word WOW just seems inadequate in describing what you folks did! While I have a complete copy I am hesitant to put it up here---these guys work black ops and spook **** and there's no telling if they digitally fingerprinted it. I don't want to get my spies fired or anything. The head of the program admits the Failed Aviation Administration agreed to suspend evaluations on this government contract---the very evaluations that determine LockMart's success and bonus money. He tries to justify it by saying, hey, you passed a couple of evals before you would have augered in faster than United 93 trying to provide half-ass service to half the customers you had last year. Nicely done, Marion. You got your Flight Service running like a business, all right. A very shoddy, crappy mortuary. These criminals stole 2500 pensions from hard working civil servants so they could do THIS? I swear, a tribunal of some sort is in order. Let's get a few of these skulls stuck on sticks out in front of 800 Independence as a warning to the next group. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Failed Aviation Administration strikes again | The3rdRail | Piloting | 10 | March 6th 08 09:46 PM |
Failed Aviation Administration News | HilldaBeast | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | November 11th 07 10:45 PM |
Failed Aviation Administration News | HilldaBeast | Piloting | 0 | November 11th 07 04:00 PM |
Another example of the Failed Aviation Administration | LeroyJones | Piloting | 1 | October 31st 07 03:25 PM |
Another example of the Failed Aviation Administration | LeroyJones | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 31st 07 03:25 PM |