If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
Pylon racing and now Rocket Racing! http://www.rocketracingleague.com/ Rocket Racing League he 21st century's newest and greatest sport - racing rocket- powered aircraft The Rocket Racing League® is an aerospace sports and entertainment organization that combines the competition of racing with the excitement of rocketry. The RRL was established by X-Prize founder Peter Diamandis and two-time Indianapolis 500 champion team partner Granger Whitelaw to advance the technology and increase public awareness of space travel. The NASCAR-style racing league features rocket-powered aircraft that will be flown by top pilots through a 'three-dimensional track way' at venues throughout the world. With millions of fans who enjoy racing and air shows, and an even wider audience enthralled with humanity's next step into space, rocket racing is destined to become the future of racing! Video: http://www.rocketracingleague.com/todayshowclip.html http://www.rocketracingleague.com/foxnewsclip.html http://www.rocketracingleague.com/me...4_oshkosh.html Rocket Racing League® Announces First Exhibition Race, Upcoming Race Schedule, Key Partnership and Acquisition New Entertainment Sports League to Stage First Exhibition Race at EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh August 1st and August 2nd Armadillo Aerospace to provide LOX Engine for Rocket Racer Rocket Racing Composite Announces Acquisition of Velocity Aircraft NEW YORK - April 14, 2008 )-The Rocket Racing League® (RRL TM), the new entertainment sports league that combines the exhilaration of racing with the power of rocket engines, today announced that the First Exhibition Race of the Rocket Racing League® will take place on August 1st and August 2nd at EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh, WI. In addition to announcing the dates of the First Exhibition Races, the Rocket Racing League® also announced the remaining series of exhibition races for the rest of 2008, the acquisition of Velocity Aircraft by Rocket Racing Composites Corp., and announced that Armadillo Aerospace will manufacture liquid oxygen (LOX) engines for the Rocket Racing League® . First Exhibition Race On August 1st and August 2nd, the first Exhibition Race of the Rocket Racing League® will be held at EAA AirVenture in Oshkosh, WI, the largest air show in the world. For the first time ever, two Rocket Racers will compete head-to-head in a demonstration race in the raceway in the sky. The Rocket Racer pilots will view the "raceway in the sky" via in-panel and 3D helmet displays and the 700,000 people in attendance at EAA AirVenture will witness the racing action live on multiple large projection screens. "The first Exhibition Race of the Rocket Racer is an important milestone in the progression of the Rocket Racing League® ," said Granger Whitelaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Rocket Racing League® . "We look forward to sharing the experience and thrill of rocket racing with the public." Exhibition Race Schedule Following the first Exhibition Race at EAA AirVenture, the RRL will hold exhibition races at venues around the country, including: * Reno National Championship Air Races (Reno, NV) - September 10-14 * X Prize Cup (Las Cruces, NM) - TBD 2008 * Aviation Nation, Nellis AFB, (Las Vegas, NV) - November 8-9 News: http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pr...-releases.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August2nd, 2008
On Jun 28, 11:06*am, Larry Dighera wrote:
Pylon racing and now Rocket Racing! * *http://www.rocketracingleague.com/ * * Rocket Racing League * * he 21st century's newest and greatest sport - racing rocket- * * powered aircraft OK. I am a bit out of date but my understanding is that it is timed circuits, not 2 or more in the air at the same time. Not what I consider 'racing'. Further, reading between the lines of the press release. You won't see the planes flying except on a video screen. If either of them, especially the 'screen' bit is correct, color me very bored. Harry K |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:06:27 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote in : On Jun 28, 11:06*am, Larry Dighera wrote: Pylon racing and now Rocket Racing! * *http://www.rocketracingleague.com/ * * Rocket Racing League * * he 21st century's newest and greatest sport - racing rocket- * * powered aircraft OK. I am a bit out of date but my understanding is that it is timed circuits, not 2 or more in the air at the same time. Not what I consider 'racing'. Where did you get that idea? Further, reading between the lines of the press release. You won't see the planes flying except on a video screen. I believe that is incorrect also. If either of them, especially the 'screen' bit is correct, color me very bored. Harry K View this video, and then tell me what you believe is correct: http://www.rocketracingleague.com/foxnewsclip.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:06:27 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote: OK. I am a bit out of date but my understanding is that it is timed circuits, not 2 or more in the air at the same time. Not what I consider 'racing'. No, from what I understand, it's head-to-head. However, the rockets burn through fuel quickly...I've heard that less than half of a typical 15-minute flight will be under power. The RRL is doing pit stops, but of course a plane just out of the pits will be a lot slower and have less acceleration than those already aloft (due to still carrying a heavy fuel load). Further, reading between the lines of the press release. You won't see the planes flying except on a video screen. You won't see the *course* any way than on a video screen. Unlike Red Bull and Reno, there are no physical pylons. The pilots apparently follow their flight directors, which are programmed with the route. If you want to see how they're doing, you have to view the information on the video screens. You'll see the planes flying, but I've heard that most the flying will occur at 1,000 feet or above (one guy told me 5,000 feet!). Since the majority of each flight is power-off, they probably need the altitude to stretch their endurance. The most interesting aspect will probably be the pit stops...the current record for a rocket-powered-airplane pit stop is something like two hours! They've supposedly reduced that by more than an order of magnitude. However, as most airports don't have grandstands, you probably won't be able to watch the action in the pits directly since the people in front will block everyone else's view. Hence, you'll probably end up watching the pit stops on the video monitors as well. It *does* look like the RRL was considering grandstands, at least initially. Check out their proximity to the runway on this promotional artwork on the RRL web page: http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pr.../runwaybig.jpg Ten rocket planes going by, a half a wingspan away? I don't think they even MAKE Excedrin tablets that large... :-) Ron Wanttaja |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August2nd, 2008
On Jun 30, 7:01*pm, Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:06:27 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote: OK. *I am a bit out of date but my understanding is that it is timed circuits, not 2 or more in the air at the same time. *Not what I consider 'racing'. No, from what I understand, it's head-to-head. *However, the rockets burn through fuel quickly...I've heard that less than half of a typical 15-minute flight will be under power. *The RRL is doing pit stops, but of course a plane just out of the pits will be a lot slower and have less acceleration than those already aloft (due to still carrying a heavy fuel load). * Further, reading between the lines of the press release. You won't see the planes flying except on a video screen. You won't see the *course* any way than on a video screen. *Unlike Red Bull and Reno, there are no physical pylons. *The pilots apparently follow their flight directors, which are programmed with the route. *If you want to see how they're doing, you have to view the information on the video screens. You'll see the planes flying, but I've heard that most the flying will occur at 1,000 feet or above (one guy told me 5,000 feet!). *Since the majority of each flight is power-off, they probably need the altitude to stretch their endurance. The most interesting aspect will probably be the pit stops...the current record for a rocket-powered-airplane pit stop is something like two hours! *They've supposedly reduced that by more than an order of magnitude. *However, as most airports don't have grandstands, you probably won't be able to watch the action in the pits directly since the people in front will block everyone else's view. Hence, you'll probably end up watching the pit stops on the video monitors as well. It *does* look like the RRL was considering grandstands, at least initially. Check out their proximity to the runway on this promotional artwork on the RRL web page: http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pr.../runwaybig.jpg Ten rocket planes going by, a half a wingspan away? *I don't think they even MAKE Excedrin tablets that large... :-) Ron Wanttaja Okay. Still skeptical of it turning into much of a spectator sport. Harry K |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:03:39 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote: Okay. Still skeptical of it turning into much of a spectator sport. I don't think they'll have trouble getting attendees for the first couple of races. The question is, how many people will be interested in spending money to see it a SECOND (and third, and fourth...) time. It could probably survive forever as one of the acts at places like Oshkosh and Reno, but they're apparently trying to make it a stand-alone attraction like the Red Bull air races. IMHO, I think the Red Bull events, with their visible course markers (where a "cut pylon" is REALLY a cut pylon) and the low-level aerobatics is a much more visceral experience for the average spectator. Sure, folks will initially come to see the rockets. Once that interest is sated, though, the question is whether the action itself is exciting enough to lure them to buy a $50-$100 ticket just to watch the rockets race again the next time they come to town. Ron Wanttaja |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
In article , Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:03:39 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote: Okay. Still skeptical of it turning into much of a spectator sport. I don't think they'll have trouble getting attendees for the first couple of races. The question is, how many people will be interested in spending money to see it a SECOND (and third, and fourth...) time. It could probably survive forever as one of the acts at places like Oshkosh and Reno, but they're apparently trying to make it a stand-alone attraction like the Red Bull air races. IMHO, I think the Red Bull events, with their visible course markers (where a "cut pylon" is REALLY a cut pylon) and the low-level aerobatics is a much more visceral experience for the average spectator. Sure, folks will initially come to see the rockets. Once that interest is sated, though, the question is whether the action itself is exciting enough to lure them to buy a $50-$100 ticket just to watch the rockets race again the next time they come to town. Ron Wanttaja It would seem to me that the way for them to make money is television. Since you have to watch a screen to see whats going on, why not put it on everybody's screen and make your money selling advertising? Proper use of cenematic technique could make it far more exciting in people's living rooms than it would be to view the action on site. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August2nd, 2008
On Jul 1, 12:37*am, Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:03:39 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote: Okay. *Still skeptical of it turning into much of a spectator sport. I don't think they'll have trouble getting attendees for the first couple of races. *The question is, how many people will be interested in spending money to see it a SECOND (and third, and fourth...) time. * It could probably survive forever as one of the acts at places like Oshkosh and Reno, but they're apparently trying to make it a stand-alone attraction like the Red Bull air races. *IMHO, I think the Red Bull events, with their visible course markers (where a "cut pylon" is REALLY a cut pylon) and the low-level aerobatics is a much more visceral experience for the average spectator. Sure, folks will initially come to see the rockets. *Once that interest is sated, though, the question is whether the action itself is exciting enough to lure them to buy a $50-$100 ticket just to watch the rockets race again the next time they come to town. Ron Wanttaja One of the big problems is teh pit stop plus short flying time. Even if they get it down to 15 minutes, they have each plane on the ground for as long, or longer, than they ar flying. I can see the announcers hyping the pit stops..."looks like Jim Campbell is going to set a new course record folks, he is almost ready to leave the pits in under.... 13.56!!" With two planes going head to head in the exhibition it will be 15 minutes flying and 15 minutes for the crowd to make their own pit stops for muchies and p calls. If that is the way it goes, I will bet the at least half the crowd will find something better to do after the first pit. Harry K |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote: One of the big problems is teh pit stop plus short flying time. Even if they get it down to 15 minutes, they have each plane on the ground for as long, or longer, than they ar flying. I can see the announcers hyping the pit stops..."looks like Jim Campbell is going to set a new course record folks, he is almost ready to leave the pits in under.... 13.56!!" With two planes going head to head in the exhibition it will be 15 minutes flying and 15 minutes for the crowd to make their own pit stops for muchies and p calls. If that is the way it goes, I will bet the at least half the crowd will find something better to do after the first pit. Actually, I got email the other day that says the RRL will be able to better the 15 minutes I'd previously guessed. If what I hear is right, I figure five minutes might be doable. However, since the planes can't taxi under their own power, that time has to include towing them back to the takeoff point. Traffic control might be an issue. The planes are practically identical in design. If they take off at about the same time, they are likely to run out of fuel at about the same time, too. How about four planes maneuvering for simultaneous deadstick landings? The only solution is to stagger the takeoffs by several minutes, to ensure there are planes that keep flying when others pit and the conflicts for runway space don't happen. But then you've lost the head-to-head racing aspect...a Rocket Racer with half its fuel burned will out-accelerate a plane that still has most of its takeoff load. You get lots of fast passes, but not the breathtaking duels of unlimited racing. I think the question you have to ask yourself is, "Will people find the *style* of racing interesting if they were prop-powered planes, instead?" The short flights, the relatively high flying, the long powerless glides, the "virtual" course that a spectator has to watch a video monitor to see, etc. If the answer is "no," then rocket racing will be successful until the novelty of seeing rocket planes glide around wears off. Ron Wanttaja |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August2nd, 2008
On Jul 1, 10:13*am, Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote: One of the big problems is teh pit stop plus short flying time. *Even if they get it down to 15 minutes, they have each plane on the ground for as long, or longer, than they ar flying. *I can see the announcers hyping the pit stops..."looks like Jim Campbell is going to set a new course record folks, he is almost ready to leave the pits in under.... 13.56!!" With two planes going head to head in the exhibition it will be 15 minutes flying and 15 minutes for the crowd to make their own pit stops for muchies and p calls. *If that is the way it goes, I will bet the at least half the crowd will find something better to do after the first pit. Actually, I got email the other day that says the RRL will be able to better the 15 minutes I'd previously guessed. *If what I hear is right, I figure five minutes might be doable. *However, since the planes can't taxi under their own power, that time has to include towing them back to the takeoff point. Traffic control might be an issue. *The planes are practically identical in design. *If they take off at about the same time, they are likely to run out of fuel at about the same time, too. *How about four planes maneuvering for simultaneous deadstick landings? The only solution is to stagger the takeoffs by several minutes, to ensure there are planes that keep flying when others pit and the conflicts for runway space don't happen. *But then you've lost the head-to-head racing aspect...a Rocket Racer with half its fuel burned will out-accelerate a plane that still has most of its takeoff load. *You get lots of fast passes, but not the breathtaking duels of unlimited racing. * I think the question you have to ask yourself is, "Will people find the *style* of racing interesting if they were prop-powered planes, instead?" *The short flights, the relatively high flying, the long powerless glides, the "virtual" course that a spectator has to watch a video monitor to see, etc. *If the answer is "no," then rocket racing will be successful until the novelty of seeing rocket planes glide around wears off. Ron Wanttaja Not sure why everyone keeps making the comment about dead stick landings. Rutan demonstrated the rocket plane at Oshkosh a couple of years back with the full ability to start, stop, and restart the engines. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
$300,000 Flight Competition August 2-10, 2008 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | January 3rd 08 11:31 AM |
Rocket Racing League/Zzzz | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 4 | May 7th 07 04:17 AM |
Rocket racing at Reno | raptor | Home Built | 2 | November 3rd 05 02:48 AM |
Rocket Racing League | John Ousterhout | Home Built | 34 | October 7th 05 06:30 AM |
August 7 Update | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | August 5th 05 01:03 AM |