Army Air Corps or US Air Force?????

Which fought better?


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote

Which fought better?

Using the number killed in friendly-fire incidents alone, I'd have
to say the USAF. The AAC killed more allied troops
than the USAF.

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

Which fought better?


USAF, of course.

"D. Strang" wrote in message
news:na%Hc.21488$r3.5662@okepread03...

Using the number killed in friendly-fire incidents alone, I'd have
to say the USAF. The AAC killed more allied troops
than the USAF.


The Air Corps didn't fight, that was the USAAF.

Which is more important - inhaling or exhaling. Makes as much sense as your
question.

Jack G

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Which fought better?


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

Come on now, he had a rough day with the Mexicans serving him beer
at the golf course tea room, paid for with his monthly welfare check.

"Jack G" wrote
Which is more important - inhaling or exhaling. Makes as much sense as your
question.

"ArtKramr" wrote
Which fought better?

"Jack G" wrote in message
Which is more important - inhaling or exhaling. Makes as much sense as
your
question.

Jack G

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
Which fought better?


Kramer has lost it but still permits his Nurse to post for him.

From: "Tom Swift"
Date: 7/11/2004 7:48 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


"Jack G" wrote in message
Which is more important - inhaling or exhaling. Makes as much sense as
your
question.

Jack G

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
Which fought better?


Kramer has lost it but still permits his Nurse to post for him.

It is possible to debate without personal attacks.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...


It is possible to debate without personal attacks.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Yes, I saw it happen once in 1998. So it is technically possible. ;-)

--
Scott

"The enemy is radical Islam and state-sponsored terrorism; the obstacles to
success are the French and American liberals.." - Joseph A. Klein

From: "tscottme"
Date: 7/12/2004 6:03 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

"B2431" wrote in message
...


It is possible to debate without personal attacks.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Yes, I saw it happen once in 1998. So it is technically possible. ;-)

--
Scott


It did? Can you provide a cite, witnesses or testimony under oath?

(please note liberal use of sarcasm)

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired