![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...aneur-se-dislo que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was the new Archaeopteryx high tech hang glider/microlift glider
(http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/index.html): L/D 28:1, VNE 130 kph, + 5.3 g/- 2.65 g, and, as demonstrated, a balistic recovery chute :-) Very interesting concept that puts it between a hang glider and a full fledged glider as we know it. The pilot was doing acro, after some spinning he was coming out of his second loop and must have pulled a little too hard on the stick during recovery... Here a better view of the sequence of events: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgOR5PLTn84 Markus On Sep 20, 5:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 20, 5:42*pm, Markus Graeber wrote:
It was the new Archaeopteryx high tech hang glider/microlift glider (http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/index.html): L/D 28:1, VNE 130 kph, + 5.3 g/- 2.65 g, and, as demonstrated, a balistic recovery chute :-) *Very interesting concept that puts it between a hang glider and a full fledged glider as we know it. The pilot was doing acro, after some spinning he was coming out of his second loop and must have pulled a little too hard on the stick during recovery... Here a better view of the sequence of events: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgOR5PLTn84 Markus On Sep 20, 5:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur.... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Looks to me like the first loop would have been pulling more G's than the second. Higher speed, harder pull. Perhaps the damage was done on the first one. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Westbender" wrote in message
: On Sep 20, 5:42*pm, Markus Graeber wrote: It was the new Archaeopteryx high tech hang glider/microlift glider (http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/index.html): L/D 28:1, VNE 130 kph, + 5.3 g/- 2.65 g, and, as demonstrated, a balistic recovery chute :-) *Very interesting concept that puts it between a hang glider and a full fledged glider as we know it. The pilot was doing acro, after some spinning he was coming out of his second loop and must have pulled a little too hard on the stick during recovery... Here a better view of the sequence of events: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgOR5PLTn84 Markus On Sep 20, 5:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Looks to me like the first loop would have been pulling more G's than the second. Higher speed, harder pull. Perhaps the damage was done on the first one. Before the loops, I noticed that he did a rather significant negative pushover.... Wonder if that might have weakened something... Larry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 21, 8:51*pm, "Larry Goddard" wrote:
"Westbender" wrote in message : On Sep 20, 5:42*pm, Markus Graeber wrote: It was the new Archaeopteryx high tech hang glider/microlift glider (http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/index.html): L/D 28:1, VNE 130 kph, + 5.3 g/- 2.65 g, and, as demonstrated, a balistic recovery chute :-) *Very interesting concept that puts it between a hang glider and a full fledged glider as we know it. The pilot was doing acro, after some spinning he was coming out of his second loop and must have pulled a little too hard on the stick during recovery... Here a better view of the sequence of events: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgOR5PLTn84 Markus On Sep 20, 5:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Looks to me like the first loop would have been pulling more G's than the second. Higher speed, harder pull. Perhaps the damage was done on the first one. Before the loops, I noticed that he did a rather significant negative pushover.... Wonder if that might have weakened something... Larry- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Just looked like a normal push over to gain speed for an aerobatic manouevre to me. This is a foot launched glider, so must be much more lightly built than a normal glider. Derek C |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 20, 3:11*pm, Berry wrote:
In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either. Since Coupe Icare is primarily a hang-glider/paraglider event, I think it is safe to assume that this was an ultralight, possibly foot- launched aircraft. No doubt we will be further enlightened by our European colleagues in due course. Mike Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:46:19 -0700, Mike the Strike wrote:
No doubt we will be further enlightened by our European colleagues in due course. Here you go: http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/ -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 20, 3:46*pm, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Sep 20, 3:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur.... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either. Since Coupe Icare is primarily a hang-glider/paraglider event, I think it is safe to assume that this was an ultralight, possibly foot- launched aircraft. No doubt we will be further enlightened by our European colleagues in due course. Mike Mike Indeed it was an Archaeopteryx - the schedule had two of them flying there. Good photos and video on their website: http://www.ruppert-composite.ch/english/index.html Hope that their naming it after an extinct Jurassic flying dinosaur didn't jinx it! Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Mike the Strike wrote: On Sep 20, 3:11*pm, Berry wrote: In article , *"hinterland" wrote: http://www.ledauphine.com/isere-sud/...are-un-planeur... que-en-plein-vol What sort of glider was that? Wings looked sort of like an Lo-100, but the fuselage looked like a pod-and-boom affair. One of the wings appeared to chop off the tailboom as the fuselage was tumbling. Good thing it was equipped with a ballistic chute. I think it might have been hard to get out of with it tumbling like that and not too high either. Since Coupe Icare is primarily a hang-glider/paraglider event, I think it is safe to assume that this was an ultralight, possibly foot- launched aircraft. No doubt we will be further enlightened by our European colleagues in due course. Mike Mike Ah, I see now. Thanks. Pretty little machine. Must be great fun to soar those microlift machines. Not so good for aerobatics, apparently. Hey, make these gliders cheap enough and we'll have a new "extreme sport" with competitors vying to produce the most spectacular in-flight breakup. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
hey Bob, don't look. There are no wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | May 19th 08 04:43 PM |
PC-9 with all the wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | August 19th 07 01:52 AM |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |
wings | mark | Owning | 18 | February 7th 04 10:07 AM |
What it took to get wings in WW II. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 29 | July 16th 03 07:42 AM |