A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Clear Vision Panels



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 11, 04:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nyal Williams[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 259
Default Clear Vision Panels

Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. Anyone know a source?

  #2  
Old February 8th 11, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Whelan[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 400
Default Clear Vision Panels

On 2/8/2011 9:48 AM, Nyal Williams wrote:
Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. Anyone know a source?


Clear vision as in for wave flying? The simplest goal is merely an insulating
airspace...although decent vision would also be nice for the lower-level
operations. :-)

Any clear semi-rigid (yet flexible) plastic attached inside the canopy with
(say) double-sided foam tape would likely serve. Tape removal would likely be
the larger issue in the long run.

Years ago I seem to remember using lexan bonded on with some black
'silicone-like' caulking compound. Undoubtedly, better attachment options have
been developed.


Regards,
Bob W.
  #3  
Old February 8th 11, 06:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,099
Default Clear Vision Panels

On Feb 8, 9:48*am, Nyal Williams wrote:
Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
*Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. *Anyone know a source?


I've always used clear mylar, cut as needed and Scotch binders tape,
which is easily removed. My needs were temporary at wave camps rather
than for a full winter season.

Frank Whiteley
  #4  
Old February 8th 11, 09:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Clear Vision Panels

On 2/8/2011 8:48 AM, Nyal Williams wrote:
Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. Anyone know a source?


I use Lexan panels on the inside of the canopy. Once they are made, the
panels can be installed or removed in just a few minutes, and used again
for many seasons. I've been using my panels for about 10 years now. You
can download my article on them from here (140K pdf).

https://www.onlinefilefolder.com/2s9jp1he70NaAQ

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
  #5  
Old February 9th 11, 02:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
mike maskell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Clear Vision Panels

On Feb 8, 3:27*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 2/8/2011 8:48 AM, Nyal Williams wrote:

Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
* Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. *Anyone know a source?


I use Lexan panels on the inside of the canopy. Once they are made, the
panels can be installed or removed in just a few minutes, and used again
for many seasons. I've been using my panels for about 10 years now. You
can download my article on them from here (140K pdf).

*https://www.onlinefilefolder.com/2s9jp1he70NaAQ

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)


Here in frosty Canada (you know the place.....igloos, Eskimos, polar
bears!) we used to apply frost shields onto the inside of the
passenger windows or rear windows on vehicles that did not have great
interior heat. Of late I have not seen them on the store shelves but
a manufacturer shows up close to my home city of Winnipeg. Check
out : http://tarpsandfilters.com/frost_shields.php
Perhaps they can help. Meanwhile I have to go throw another log on
the fire.......minus 30C this AM, and time to put a jacket on when I
go out!
  #6  
Old February 10th 11, 07:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Pete Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Clear Vision Panels

On 2/9/2011 5:07 AM, mike maskell wrote:
Here in frosty Canada (you know the place.....igloos, Eskimos, polar
bears!)


Check
out : http://tarpsandfilters.com/frost_shields.php
Perhaps they can help. Meanwhile I have to go throw another log on
the fire.......minus 30C this AM, and time to put a jacket on when I
go out!


You Canadians are great folks but you exaggerate the temperature. My
friends in Vancouver complain bitterly when temps approach "0" by which
they mean a mere 32.


--

Pete Brown
Anchorage Alaska

Going home after a long day
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1415/...22928754_b.jpg

The fleet at Summit. Mt. McKinley is about 45nm away at 20,320 msl.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/4...cb8d2482_b.jpg

The 170B at Bold near Eklutna Glacier
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/4...a216d7bb75.jpg



  #7  
Old February 10th 11, 11:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
AGL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Clear Vision Panels


You Canadians are great folks but you exaggerate the temperature. My
friends in Vancouver complain bitterly when temps approach "0" by which
they mean a mere 32.

Pete Brown
Anchorage Alaska


Although you are correct in saying that those in Vancouver complain at
0C, as do those in Seattle, you ought to check the weather records of
Winnipeg (Winterpeg as we Canadians call it) and Anchorage.

http://pafc.arh.noaa.gov/misc.php?page=climlist -38 F Anchorage
http://weather.uk.msn.com/monthly_av...+CAN&setunit=F
-54F Winnipeg

Having said that, under -10F you put on all the clothes you have so
you have to take a run at doorways, and it's still cold, so the
difference between -38 and -54 isn't that big a deal. ;-) You could
die either way.














Going home after a long dayhttp://farm2.static.flickr.com/1415/1325102827_f322928754_b.jpg

The fleet at Summit. Mt. McKinley is about 45nm away at 20,320 msl.http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/4...cb8d2482_b.jpg

The 170B at Bold near Eklutna Glacierhttp://farm1.static.flickr.com/168/437324742_a216d7bb75.jpg


  #8  
Old February 11th 11, 03:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,099
Default Clear Vision Panels

On Feb 10, 4:28*pm, AGL wrote:
You Canadians are great folks but you exaggerate the temperature. My
friends in Vancouver complain bitterly when temps approach "0" by which
they mean a mere 32.


Pete Brown
Anchorage Alaska


Although you are correct in saying that those in Vancouver complain at
0C, as do those in Seattle, you ought to check the weather records of
Winnipeg (Winterpeg as we Canadians call it) and Anchorage.

http://pafc.arh.noaa.gov/misc.php?page=climlist* -38 F *Anchoragehttp://weather.uk.msn.com/monthly_averages.aspx?&wealocations=wc%3aCA...
-54F Winnipeg

Having said that, under -10F you put on all the clothes you have so
you have to take a run at doorways, and it's still cold, so the
difference between -38 and -54 isn't that big a deal. *;-) *You could
die either way.



My mother and her twin sister were born in Moosejaw, Saskatchewan, but
went to school in Camper, Manitoba, (173km NNW of Winnipeg). In the
early 1930's they were walking the three miles to the one room school
from the farm (been there, it's the real distance). It was extremely
cold. Their younger cousin wanted to lay down and go to sleep. They
knew that meant he was freezing to death, so they kept him walking and
dragged him along. They weren't allowed to return home later that day
as the claimed temperature was -65F. That's not inconsistent with
record lows reported in Manitoba around 1933/34. Sometimes they
skated to school on the frozen irrigation ditches.

Frank Whiteley
  #9  
Old February 10th 11, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
brianDG303[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default Clear Vision Panels

On Feb 8, 1:27*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 2/8/2011 8:48 AM, Nyal Williams wrote:

Palmer mentions these as being available from an automotive firm in Canada.
* Apparently the firm is no longer in existence. *Anyone know a source?


I use Lexan panels on the inside of the canopy. Once they are made, the
panels can be installed or removed in just a few minutes, and used again
for many seasons. I've been using my panels for about 10 years now. You
can download my article on them from here (140K pdf).

*https://www.onlinefilefolder.com/2s9jp1he70NaAQ

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)


Well, this is off-topic but.........
When testing plastics for UV transmission and comparing acrylic, lexan
(polycarbonate), and the fancy expensive plastics sold to prevent UV
damage to art and objects the acrylic varies quite a bit from as good
as the others to poor, the Lexan is very good. Most newer gliders
have canopies that reject UV enough to make it a non-issue, but if you
are concerned about UV this might be a factor in your choice of
materials.

Brian

  #10  
Old February 10th 11, 08:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Clear Vision Panels

On 2/10/2011 9:33 AM, brianDG303 wrote:

Well, this is off-topic but.........
When testing plastics for UV transmission and comparing acrylic, lexan
(polycarbonate), and the fancy expensive plastics sold to prevent UV
damage to art and objects the acrylic varies quite a bit from as good
as the others to poor, the Lexan is very good. Most newer gliders
have canopies that reject UV enough to make it a non-issue, but if you
are concerned about UV this might be a factor in your choice of
materials.


For winter flying, the UV is so low because of the sun angle, I don't
think it should be a concern. Summer flying - different story.

The advantage of polycarbonate is it's easier to work with than acrylic,
and far less likely to crack when bent for installation or in use.
Acrylic is better optically, and it's what I use for the front, flat
panel. If I could find acrylic thinner than the 0.060" stuff available
locally, I'd probably make the big panel out of it, too.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminum panels Dico Owning 7 May 8th 06 10:10 PM
Panels for the Parhelia (formerly "Not much here") Warren Simulators 6 January 16th 05 11:43 PM
SGS 2-32 interior panels Gary Boggs Soaring 1 November 24th 04 06:36 PM
Glass panels: what OS? Bruce Horn Piloting 84 June 28th 04 08:31 AM
FSCOF 2d panels gone Mongo Simulators 10 August 3rd 03 12:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.