![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of
takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. Check out the final glide. Flight report he http://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 10:55*am, Tony wrote:
Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. *I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. *I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. *Check out the final glide. Flight report hehttp://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ Good on you, Tony! I believe NG-1 was built by Jerry Nedouer, we tried for our Diamond distance flights on the same day back in 1976? From Minden to somewhere in the Owens Valley to Hawthorne. Jerry mad it and completed his Diamond badge. I landed short in my Duster, .......... L/ D is a relative thing. Cheers, JJ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 3:20*pm, JJ Sinclair wrote:
On Jun 6, 10:55*am, Tony wrote: Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. *I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. *I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. *Check out the final glide. Flight report hehttp://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ Good on you, Tony! I believe NG-1 was built by Jerry Nedouer, we tried for our Diamond distance flights on the same day back in 1976? From Minden to somewhere in the Owens Valley to Hawthorne. Jerry mad it and completed his Diamond badge. I landed short in my Duster, .......... L/ D is a relative thing. Cheers, JJ JJ - yes, Jerome Niedrauer. His son Eric is still flying the Pik 20 they bought to replace the NG-1. He'll be in Wichita this fall to see the old bird. I'll look in the logs for his diamond distance flight. I'm pretty sure he did all his diamonds in the glider. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed
Efficiency is addictive. Moved from Bergfalke 2-55 (1:26) to Std Cirrus (1:37) to Kestrel 19 (1:44) The low L/D number is not the main constraint - the speed means there are a whole new world of tasks that become possible. Welcome to the dark side. Getting home is sometimes less adventurous and probably less fun, but is a whole lot more compatible with family and commitments... So far I am scoring more than 3 to 1 on the number of times I have fetched outlanders, vs times I have needed to be fetched. Probably means I'm not trying hard enough. Bruce On 2011/06/06 7:55 PM, Tony wrote: Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. Check out the final glide. Flight report he http://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ -- Bruce Greeff T59D #1771 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 3:27*pm, BruceGreeff wrote:
Indeed Efficiency is addictive. Moved from Bergfalke 2-55 (1:26) to Std Cirrus (1:37) to Kestrel 19 (1:44) The low L/D number is not the main constraint - the speed means there are a whole new world of tasks that become possible. Welcome to the dark side. Getting home is sometimes less adventurous and probably less fun, but is a whole lot more compatible with family and commitments... So far I am scoring more than 3 to 1 on the number of times I have fetched outlanders, vs times I have needed to be fetched. *Probably means I'm not trying hard enough. Bruce On 2011/06/06 7:55 PM, Tony wrote: Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. *I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. *I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. *Check out the final glide. Flight report hehttp://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ -- Bruce Greeff T59D #1771 this was my first soaring flight of the year that didn't result in a landout. of course it was only my 4th soaring flight of the year. I still flew about as slow on this flight as I did on my almost 300 km out/return in the Cherokee last year. Most of that was on the upwind leg, i was super conservative as I've learned over the years that its hard to make progress on a task if you are sitting in a field. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 5:16*pm, Tony wrote:
On Jun 6, 3:27*pm, BruceGreeff wrote: Indeed Efficiency is addictive. Moved from Bergfalke 2-55 (1:26) to Std Cirrus (1:37) to Kestrel 19 (1:44) The low L/D number is not the main constraint - the speed means there are a whole new world of tasks that become possible. Welcome to the dark side. Getting home is sometimes less adventurous and probably less fun, but is a whole lot more compatible with family and commitments... So far I am scoring more than 3 to 1 on the number of times I have fetched outlanders, vs times I have needed to be fetched. *Probably means I'm not trying hard enough. Bruce On 2011/06/06 7:55 PM, Tony wrote: Somewhat revolutionary (for me), I actually returned to my point of takeoff yesterday after a good cross country flight. *I took the new- ish to me NG-1 (a modified BG-12/16) out for a 300 km FAI triangle. Had a good time, finished the task, and didn't need a retrieve. *I can see why you guys like more L's and fewer D's. *Check out the final glide. Flight report hehttp://soaringcafe.com/2011/06/diamond-goal/ -- Bruce Greeff T59D #1771 this was my first soaring flight of the year that didn't result in a landout. of course it was only my 4th soaring flight of the year. *I still flew about as slow on this flight as I did on my almost 300 km out/return in the Cherokee last year. *Most of that was on the upwind leg, i was super conservative as I've learned over the years that its hard to make progress on a task if you are sitting in a field.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Tony, for some reason I thought you did your 300k last year....am I thinking of a near miss? Bruce is right; it's the speed. Gary Adams GA2 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary,
Last year I did an out and almost return Diamond Goal attempt in the Cherokee. The write up for that one is on my Cherokee II blog as well as Soaring Cafe. Total distance on that one was a touch over 300 km but i ended up landing 4 miles short of the starting airport at 7:30 PM. That one was a 6.5 hr flight, about the same as Sunday. http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...tId=1688698192 I also did a 300 km straight out flight last year for Gold Distance http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...tId=1618688367 Interestingly the speed I made in the Cherokee on the out and return was about the same as I made in the NG-1 on Sunday. I bet if I was in a Nimbus I could still average 30 mph! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Tony
My first 300km flight in my Cirrus I averaged below stall speed.... One of my difficulties moving from the plywood overcast was the much greater variation in speeds. Wood and fabric ships often have a very small drag bucket because of the airfoil and construction. So you fly between thermals at a speed not that vastly different from your thermal speed. Then you get into something with very laminar wings and flaps and cruise speed is anything up to 3x stall. Kestrel has about the same handicap as a Ventus. Stall is 32.5kt - full of water at max wingloading and with thermals in the 4-5m/s range my flight computer is indicating 90kt cruise. That is a bit optimistic but not that much. The ASG29/Ventus2/JS1 crowd disdain to fly slower than 110kt (200km/h) between thermals most of the time... Consequently I'm still waaay too slow in the Kestrel. It just feels wrong to cruise at 80kt. But that is her sweet spot for most of our conditions. Even in our winter conditions the efficient cruise speed makes long flights possible. Get it wrong and the retrieves are correspondingly long. Personal record is 126km... All I can say is thanks for GPS - at least you can get people to find you down some obscure farm road in the middle of nowhere. That said, there is no difference in the fun you can have at any given performance level - it is just the distance you can cover , places you can reach that changes. (and the cost, never forget the cost) On 2011/06/08 04:08 AM, Tony wrote: Gary, Last year I did an out and almost return Diamond Goal attempt in the Cherokee. The write up for that one is on my Cherokee II blog as well as Soaring Cafe. Total distance on that one was a touch over 300 km but i ended up landing 4 miles short of the starting airport at 7:30 PM. That one was a 6.5 hr flight, about the same as Sunday. http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...tId=1688698192 I also did a 300 km straight out flight last year for Gold Distance http://www.onlinecontest.org/olc-2.0...tId=1618688367 Interestingly the speed I made in the Cherokee on the out and return was about the same as I made in the NG-1 on Sunday. I bet if I was in a Nimbus I could still average 30 mph! -- Bruce Greeff T59D #1771 & Std Cirrus #57 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|