If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund
Here is a news release for the General Aviation Defense Fund.
This is something that can potentially affect a lot of pilots. ************************************************** *********** GENERAL AVIATION LEGAL DEFENSE FUND CREATED TO FIGHT EFFORTS TO BLOCK FREEDOM OF FLIGHT WESTBOROUGH, Mass. - (May 11, 2004) - A group of citizen-pilots in Massachusetts are banding together, and asking for financial support, to thwart legal action aimed at curtailing the freedom to utilize legal airspace over the state. The General Aviation Legal Defense Fund (GALDF) was established to raise the one hundred thousand dollars (or more) necessary to fight this effort, which could jeopardize the training and safety of general aviation pilots and passengers in New England. The case also threatens to impact other pilots who fly for business and recreation throughout the country, if this action becomes a precedent. The legal action, filed by landowners in exclusive residential areas in Massachusetts, claims that general-aviation flights over their properties, towns, and neighboring towns are a "nuisance." The lawsuit also contends that these homeowners should be compensated for their alleged inability to use their property. The group behind the lawsuit demands that general aviation pilots purchase tracts of land large enough to pursue their activity. "This disturbing lawsuit has the potential to severely cripple general aviation throughout the country because it allows a group of well-to-do property owners to 'fence off' the public airspace and dictate national policy," said Stephen Cunningham, GALDF spokesman. "We have continually looked to work with this group and come to an even-handed compromise, and we still offer to work toward a solution. Instead, this group has sued individual pilots in the hope of keeping them grounded. Aside from the aviation safety, navigation, and legal implications this could mean for all pilots, this is an ominous sign for Americans' personal freedom." Other aviation groups are deeply concerned as well. Phil Boyer, president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, said in his April, 2004 President's Position column: "every pilot in the United States could be adversely affected by this case... This is a case we must win to prevent a dangerous precedent." The individual pilots named as defendants in the suit did not break any Federal Aviation Regulations, according to the Federal Aviation Administration, which studied more than 30 private flights cited by the wealthy homeowners. The suit does not allege any violations of Federal Aviation Regulations. The lawsuit was filed after FAA refused to privatize airspace over these exclusive rural properties, as federal law states that the national airspace was established to be open to all legal operations. Ironically, two of the plaintiffs in the case purchased their properties when a U.S. Army air base (since decommissioned for budgetary reasons) was still active less than one mile away. The group behind the lawsuit states their goals very clearly: They aim to ban legal recreational flying over their own properties. Some of the plaintiffs are founding members of an organization entitled "Stop The Noise", which demands aircraft must be channeled into narrow corridors and over property purchased exclusively for aviation uses. The group filing the suit also makes no claim of proper noise levels or any scientific analysis of the issue. "We are trying to defend nothing less than legally pursued personal freedom," Cunningham said. "If successful, this lawsuit would have a chilling impact for much more than recreational flying. It would open any legal pursuit done in public space - land, air or water - to be judged outside of an individual's arbitrary standards. Activities such as motor boating, motorcycling, snowmobiling or ATV four wheeling is at the same risk. Additionally, time honored home owner chores like lawn mowing and snowplowing or even chainsaw use for yard work could become included in this action. These things have a way of being taken to extremes. It would theoretically allow a person to claim that school buses driving down a street, children on bicycles or even whistling on a public sidewalk to be arbitrarily deemed 'too loud' by any individual who wishes to create his own personal bubble of silence." The General Aviation Legal Defense Fund needs private contributions to help stop this assault on personal freedom. To donate on-line or obtain additional information, visit www.gadefensefund.org or send contributions to: General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Suite 6, Box 368 290 Turnpike Road Westborough MA 01581 Donations are not tax deductible, and GALDF is not associated with any other established organization. ---------------------------------------------------- Guenther Eichhorn | Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA CPL,ASMELS,Glider,LBH,IA,CFI | Pitts S-2A: N1GE See: http://acro.harvard.edu/ACRO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |