A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Offering the Middle-digit Salute in Response to Brazil



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 20th 04, 02:27 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Offering the Middle-digit Salute in Response to Brazil


Proof, that what goes around, comes around:


-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVflash Volume 10, Number 04a -- January 19, 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------

....AND BIRD-FLIPPING PILOT RILES BRAZILIANS
Capt. Dale Robin Hersh discovered the Brazilian authorities' preferred
level of etiquette after last Wednesday allegedly offering the
middle-digit salute in response to Brazil's new requirement that
American visitors submit to photographs and fingerprinting ... which
is how Brazilians are welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules.
Hersh's alleged gesture (maybe that's how he always holds things)
landed him in a federal courthouse where formal charges awaited, but
"Since this was a minor crime, I proposed that he be fined $12,750,
which will be donated to a home for the elderly," Matheus Baraldi
Magnani told the Associated Press.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#186508

  #2  
Old January 20th 04, 02:37 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

Proof, that what goes around, comes around:


What is it that you believe is coming around?


  #3  
Old January 20th 04, 03:54 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:37:51 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in Message-Id:
. net:


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

Proof, that what goes around, comes around:


What is it that you believe is coming around?


The article contained this bit of information:

"Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to
photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are
welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules."

I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and
photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark
similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries.

Additionally, the unprofessional conduct of Capt. Dale Robin Hersh
earned him the fine he deserved IMO.

  #4  
Old January 20th 04, 04:30 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

The article contained this bit of information:

"Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to
photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are
welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules."

I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and
photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark
similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries.


But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or any
other individual country, the requirement applies to all passengers not
otherwise documented.


  #5  
Old January 20th 04, 05:07 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:30:57 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in Message-Id:
.net:


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

The article contained this bit of information:

"Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to
photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are
welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules."

I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and
photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark
similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries.


But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or any
other individual country, the requirement applies to all passengers not
otherwise documented.


What does your phrase "not otherwise documented" mean? Other than
what? Aren't all international travelers required to possess a
Passport?

Are you saying that ALL airline passengers entering the US are
currently being fingerprinted and photographed? If so, this is the
first I've heard of that practice being instituted.

Your reply implies that you believe that Brazil has "singled out" US
passengers for fingerprinting and photographing. Are you able to
provide a credible citation substantiating that contention? The
quoted article's lack of explicitly stating that Brazil is requiring
fingerprinting and photographing _solely_ of US passengers is
ambiguous IMO.


  #6  
Old January 20th 04, 05:45 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

What does your phrase "not otherwise documented" mean? Other than
what? Aren't all international travelers required to possess a
Passport?


No, not all international travelers entering the US are required to possess
a passport.



Are you saying that ALL airline passengers entering the US are
currently being fingerprinted and photographed? If so, this is the
first I've heard of that practice being instituted.


No, I'm not saying that ALL airline passengers entering the US are currently
being fingerprinted and photographed. Many nations are exempt, but Brazil
isn't one of them. There are several requirements to be exempt. The nation
must issue passports that can be scanned by machine, they must also
''demonstrate that adequate safeguards against fraudulent use of their
passports are in place.'' Forged documents are apparently easy to come by
in Brazil.



Your reply implies that you believe that Brazil has "singled out" US
passengers for fingerprinting and photographing. Are you able to
provide a credible citation substantiating that contention?


"Brazil began on Jan. 1 to fingerprint and photograph all American citizens
arriving here in response to Washington's new policy, which went into effect
on Jan. 5. A judge in a remote state said the action was necessary because
U.S. policy was ''xenophobic and worthy of the worst horrors of the Nazis,''
and the Foreign Ministry endorsed his order, arguing that ''reciprocity is a
basic element of foreign relations.''


http://www.iht.com/articles/124703.html


  #7  
Old January 20th 04, 07:20 PM
Gig Giacona
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:30:57 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote in Message-Id:
.net:


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .

The article contained this bit of information:

"Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to
photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are
welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules."

I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and
photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark
similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries.


But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or any
other individual country, the requirement applies to all passengers not
otherwise documented.


What does your phrase "not otherwise documented" mean? Other than
what? Aren't all international travelers required to possess a
Passport?

Are you saying that ALL airline passengers entering the US are
currently being fingerprinted and photographed? If so, this is the
first I've heard of that practice being instituted.

Your reply implies that you believe that Brazil has "singled out" US
passengers for fingerprinting and photographing. Are you able to
provide a credible citation substantiating that contention? The
quoted article's lack of explicitly stating that Brazil is requiring
fingerprinting and photographing _solely_ of US passengers is
ambiguous IMO.




First, the US is photographing and fingerprinting all foreign nationals that
are required to have a Visa to enter the USA. Brazil is included in that
group. Brazil is ONLY photographing & fingerprinting US citizens.

Is this fair? Sure it is. Brazil is a sovereign nation and can control their
borders any way they choose. Is it being done because we are doing it to
them and not for security reasons? Sure it is, but again it is their country
and they can do what they want to do at its' borders.

If anyone as an American citizen doesn't like it don't go to Brazil.

Gig Giacona
www.peoamerica.net/N601WR


  #8  
Old January 21st 04, 02:48 AM
Jürgen Exner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

The article contained this bit of information:

"Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to
photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are
welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules."

I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and
photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark
similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries.


But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or
any other individual country, the requirement applies to all
passengers not otherwise documented.


Simple: it is called reciprocal.
If you let my citizen into your country without a visa, then I will let your
citizen into my country without a visa.
If you are charging my citizien 200$ processing fee, them I will charge your
citizen 200$ processing fee.
If you don't require my citizen to present a passport (just an ID is good
enough), then I don't require your citizen do present a passport.
If you are fingerprinting my citizen, then I will fingerprint your citizen.

I am glad that Brazil had the guts to stand up against arrogance.

jue


  #9  
Old January 20th 04, 11:30 PM
Casey Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Additionally, the unprofessional conduct of Capt. Dale Robin Hersh
earned him the fine he deserved IMO.


I agree.
It appears to me the Brazilian authorities were taking purile punitive
retaliation, but it does not excuse "ugly American" actions such as this.


  #10  
Old January 21st 04, 05:27 AM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Casey Wilson" wrote in message


It appears to me the Brazilian authorities were taking purile
punitive retaliation, but it does not excuse "ugly American" actions
such as this.


Maybe, but would American officials put a foreign national on trial for
flipping off the airport camera? I doubt it based on that alone.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 1 April 9th 04 11:25 PM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 0 April 7th 04 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.