![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw that item in AOPA's web site and found one other interesting
thing: According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ to them every two months. --WTF? Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC? Grrrrrrr... ~( Jake Brodsky, PP ASEL IA, Cessna Cardinal N30946, Based @ FME Amateur Radio Station AB3A |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message
According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ to them every two months. --WTF? Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC? The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said restrictions are at the behest of other organizations. My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just do what Mayor Daley did to Meigs Field in Chicago when he didn't get
the restrictions he wanted...just take a backhoe out to Reagan at 3:00 in the morning and cut big "X"'s the length of the runways! "John T" wrote in message ws.com... "Jake Brodsky" wrote in message According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ to them every two months. --WTF? Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC? The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said restrictions are at the behest of other organizations. My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:13:01 GMT, "John T" wrote:
My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? And I'll pose another question right back: HOW can the FAA say the that the restrictions are not justified? They don't even work for the same department! The only justification the FAA could offer is that the ADIZ is ineffective. The appropriate response would be to tie both the FAA and the pilot community in to even bigger knots and to jump through even more hoops. The FAA may be inefficient, but like any government agency, they know how to protect their own from an unwinnable battle. I don't see how your hypothetical scenario could ever happen. Jake Brodsky, PP ASEL IA, Cessna Cardinal N30946, Based @ FME Amateur Radio Station AB3A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message
I don't see how your hypothetical scenario could ever happen. "I have a dream..." ![]() -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jake Brodsky wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:13:01 GMT, "John T" wrote: My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? And I'll pose another question right back: HOW can the FAA say the that the restrictions are not justified? They don't even work for the same department! The FAA has really only one answer: we're told to do this. - Andrew |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John T" wrote in message ws.com... My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? I believe the FAA already believes the restrictions aren't justified. Unfortunately they aren't running the show. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
I believe the FAA already believes the restrictions aren't justified. Unfortunately they aren't running the show. That's my understanding, as well, which is why I think Jay is correct in that the FAA will continue to say: "Other government agencies are providing 'clear and credible' evidence that these restrictions are necessary." -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My guess is that it is all a political ploy. The FAA doesn't have to
justify the effectiveness of the security itself, just the ADIZ implementation. They do this by saying that the ADIZ is the only way to positively identify all aircraft within 30 NM of DC, as per the requirement imposed upon them by the TSA, SS, Hom-a-land Security Commission, or whomever. I would think that it is not within the scope of the FAA's responsibility (or even their privileged knowledge) to identify the reasons behind the request for this positive identification, only that they have acted appropriately upon it, and will continue to do so until the request is rescinded/cancelled/eliminated. They probably do not have access to the so-called "sensitive chatter transmissions" or whatever other bull**** "evidence" the buearacrats have to justify the request. But again, in a buearacracy, it's not about sound logic - it's about passing the buck while creating the illusion of accountability. So when Congress gets up and asks for accountability from a place where they know accountability is not available, the public (or in this case, the pilots and airlines) think they are doing something positive for them. Now they can tell all the pilots and airline execs, "Look what we are doing to support you, now vote for me!" And they think we are as stupid as the rest of the public and don't know what's really going on... "John T" wrote in ws.com: "Jake Brodsky" wrote in message According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ to them every two months. --WTF? Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC? The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said restrictions are at the behest of other organizations. My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not justified? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jake Brodsky wrote:
I saw that item in AOPA's web site and found one other interesting thing: According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ to them every two months. --WTF? Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC? Yes, and that's why it's a farce. Every 2 months, the FAA will tell Congress "The Department of Homeland Defense, as well as the Secret Service, is requiring it", and nothing else will happen. --- Jay -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino/ ! ! ! Checkout http://www.oc-adolfos.com/ for the best Italian food in Ocean City, MD and... Checkout http://www.brolow.com/ for authentic Blues music on Delmarva |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNAV Enroute CHarts | John R. Copeland | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | September 20th 04 03:33 PM |
how to get NACO online charts conveniently? | Dave Butler | Instrument Flight Rules | 41 | June 16th 04 03:14 PM |
Is the DC ADIZ on the charts? | Snowbird | Piloting | 38 | November 19th 03 03:27 AM |
that Mooney in DC ADIZ | Cub Driver | Piloting | 10 | November 13th 03 09:15 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |