A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Charts to have DC ADIZ on them



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 04, 04:03 PM
Jake Brodsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Charts to have DC ADIZ on them

I saw that item in AOPA's web site and found one other interesting
thing:

According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?

Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?

Grrrrrrr... ~(


Jake Brodsky,
PP ASEL IA, Cessna Cardinal N30946, Based @ FME
Amateur Radio Station AB3A
  #2  
Old February 5th 04, 04:13 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message


According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?

Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?


The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said restrictions
are at the behest of other organizations.

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not
justified?

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #3  
Old February 5th 04, 04:49 PM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just do what Mayor Daley did to Meigs Field in Chicago when he didn't get
the restrictions he wanted...just take a backhoe out to Reagan at 3:00 in
the morning and cut big "X"'s the length of the runways!


"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...
"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message


According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?

Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?


The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said

restrictions
are at the behest of other organizations.

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not
justified?

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________




  #4  
Old February 5th 04, 04:51 PM
Jake Brodsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:13:01 GMT, "John T" wrote:

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not
justified?


And I'll pose another question right back: HOW can the FAA say the
that the restrictions are not justified? They don't even work for the
same department!

The only justification the FAA could offer is that the ADIZ is
ineffective. The appropriate response would be to tie both the FAA
and the pilot community in to even bigger knots and to jump through
even more hoops. The FAA may be inefficient, but like any government
agency, they know how to protect their own from an unwinnable battle.

I don't see how your hypothetical scenario could ever happen.


Jake Brodsky,
PP ASEL IA, Cessna Cardinal N30946, Based @ FME
Amateur Radio Station AB3A
  #5  
Old February 5th 04, 06:34 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message


I don't see how your hypothetical scenario could ever happen.


"I have a dream..."

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #6  
Old February 5th 04, 08:35 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jake Brodsky wrote:

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:13:01 GMT, "John T" wrote:

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not
justified?


And I'll pose another question right back: HOW can the FAA say the
that the restrictions are not justified? They don't even work for the
same department!


The FAA has really only one answer: we're told to do this.

- Andrew

  #7  
Old February 5th 04, 05:14 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John T" wrote in message ws.com...
My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are not

justified?

I believe the FAA already believes the restrictions aren't justified.
Unfortunately they aren't running the show.

  #8  
Old February 5th 04, 06:36 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message


I believe the FAA already believes the restrictions aren't justified.
Unfortunately they aren't running the show.


That's my understanding, as well, which is why I think Jay is correct in
that the FAA will continue to say:

"Other government agencies are providing 'clear and credible' evidence that
these restrictions are necessary."

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #9  
Old February 6th 04, 04:58 AM
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My guess is that it is all a political ploy. The FAA doesn't have to
justify the effectiveness of the security itself, just the ADIZ
implementation. They do this by saying that the ADIZ is the only way to
positively identify all aircraft within 30 NM of DC, as per the
requirement imposed upon them by the TSA, SS, Hom-a-land Security
Commission, or whomever. I would think that it is not within the scope of
the FAA's responsibility (or even their privileged knowledge) to identify
the reasons behind the request for this positive identification, only
that they have acted appropriately upon it, and will continue to do so
until the request is rescinded/cancelled/eliminated.

They probably do not have access to the so-called "sensitive chatter
transmissions" or whatever other bull**** "evidence" the buearacrats have
to justify the request. But again, in a buearacracy, it's not about sound
logic - it's about passing the buck while creating the illusion of
accountability. So when Congress gets up and asks for accountability from
a place where they know accountability is not available, the public (or
in this case, the pilots and airlines) think they are doing something
positive for them.

Now they can tell all the pilots and airline execs, "Look what we are
doing to support you, now vote for me!" And they think we are as stupid
as the rest of the public and don't know what's really going on...



"John T" wrote in
ws.com:

"Jake Brodsky" wrote in message


According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?

Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?


The FAA still implements the airspace restrictions even if said
restrictions are at the behest of other organizations.

My question is: What will happen if the FAA says the restrictions are
not justified?


  #10  
Old February 5th 04, 05:02 PM
Jay Masino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jake Brodsky wrote:
I saw that item in AOPA's web site and found one other interesting
thing:
According to AOPA, Congress is requiring the *FAA* to justify the ADIZ
to them every two months. --WTF?
Shouldn't this request have been made of the Department of Homeland
Security? How did this thing get so sidetracked? Does anyone think
the FAA wants anything to do with an ADIZ over Washington DC?


Yes, and that's why it's a farce. Every 2 months, the FAA will tell
Congress "The Department of Homeland Defense, as well as the Secret
Service, is requiring it", and nothing else will happen.

--- Jay

--
__!__
Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___
http://www2.ari.net/jmasino/ ! ! !

Checkout http://www.oc-adolfos.com/
for the best Italian food in Ocean City, MD and...
Checkout http://www.brolow.com/ for authentic Blues music on Delmarva

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RNAV Enroute CHarts John R. Copeland Instrument Flight Rules 0 September 20th 04 03:33 PM
how to get NACO online charts conveniently? Dave Butler Instrument Flight Rules 41 June 16th 04 03:14 PM
Is the DC ADIZ on the charts? Snowbird Piloting 38 November 19th 03 03:27 AM
that Mooney in DC ADIZ Cub Driver Piloting 10 November 13th 03 09:15 PM
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? Bob Gardner Instrument Flight Rules 5 September 6th 03 01:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.