![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Huge thanks to the folks at Seminole Lake Gliderport and to Andy McQuigg
for conceiving of and hosting the first Florida Grand Prix. The wet weather relented on Sunday and we got a beautiful blue sky full of cu's and a well-called task to match. I won't recount the race or results. That's for the organizers. I will say that the GP format worked well and was tremendous fun to fly. I have no problem with the conventional glider race format, but the GP does make for a very enjoyable and satisfying change. Everyone starting together and flying in the same air is great. There is less incentive for leeching in the GP. One can't win by following, at some point you have to physically get out ahead of your competitors. We had a max start height and a minimum finish height, so no safety issues there. The only safety issue I saw was my own stupidity regarding the start. I noodled around and ended up a couple of miles on the wrong side of the line too close to the gate opening time for my class. Scooting back to the line, I was not thinking about the class that was just starting so I was head-on to them. Really dumb on my part. The start line is not very wide, so it would have been much smarter to have flown around the end. No rules needed, just remind everyone to stay out from in front of the start line. WB --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was truly a ball! I cannot wait for the next one! We are going to have a great winter flying these events together!
Sean 7T P.S. I will try to remember to close my spoilers next time! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The popularity of this format on r.a.s. motivated a question on the pilot opinion poll about whether you'd like to see it included in regular regional rules. I hope that people watching here will answer, and especially that the people who now have some experience with this format will chime in and add to the comments section
John Cochrane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
I think GP its totally safe in small classes. I would not do it if the class was larger than say, 10-15 gliders. So maybe this would be a fun thing to have in the stack for a small 18 or 15 meter class at a regionals? Even in Sports you could do handicap ranges and remove the handicap allowing for level racing and first to finish wins scenario's! This was popular this weekend and nobody really cared about the handicaps. They were happy to forget them and race level, glider to glider! Once the class gets much larger than 10 (with ranging experience levels, etc) it may create some linear level of chaos around the starting line. This might be considered higher risk or perhaps even unwise. Perhaps a longer starting line would spread out the field more? With 10 in the air (3 classes, 2, 4 and 4) starting in 5 minute stagger (basically everyone in the same area getting ready to start, starting, etc it was very fun and manageable. Glider behaviors were VERY predictable. You know that guy/gal had to come to the line and start at some point. There was less randomness to the pilots behaviors. Once on course, it was beautiful to know that you were actually racing! I also like the idea of Grand Prix out of a 5 mile cylinder so there are many options to exit the starting area but it all happens at one time. This might work for slightly larger classes. For example out the top? Bottom line: It is ALOT of fun knowing that glider B is even with you (glider A) 90 minutes into the task and that you will need to find a way to get ahead if you are going to beat him RATHER THAN knowing you started behind him and all you need to do is lock on and win. I think our open starting gate (start anytime) promotes loitering around unpredictably AND encourages the classic tactic or starting last, catching and leeching even more than you think! This GP concept could be really, really fun for pilots and the rules and scoring is incredibly easy. We did the scoring on a simple spreadsheet using winscore to quickly validate start height, turnpoints achieved and finish height. Basically elapsed time (lowest wins!). Link to GP rules he https://sites.google.com/site/sgpflu...es-and-scoring Best, Sean 7T On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 1:03:25 PM UTC-4, wrote: The popularity of this format on r.a.s. motivated a question on the pilot opinion poll about whether you'd like to see it included in regular regional rules. I hope that people watching here will answer, and especially that the people who now have some experience with this format will chime in and add to the comments section John Cochrane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. A set start time eliminates gaggling and leeching. Our current timed start was developed because historically you needed to fly through the gate, and the gate could not handle everyone at the same time. No more gate, and a wide start area makes starting everyone at the same time a bit more practical.
The appeal of ending start gate roulette and leeching is very high. There are a lot of open questions. Yes, how many gliders can we safely handle. Here the issue is the first few gagggles, which will inevitably have most of the fleet. My sense like yours is that 10-15 is a reasonable maximum. Larger numbers may be safe too. At world contests everyone also leaves at the same time in a big gaggle of 40 or more, they just wait a few hours to do it! Another question is whether pilots will think it's fair to start everyone at the same time. I often seem to coast around for hours, then suddenly I'm at 2000' struggling when it's time to go. We don't always or even often fly in such predictable conditions that everyone can be right at MSH at the edge of the cylinder when it's time to go. One might say, well, that's the luck of the draw,but pilots have to like the format and if the whole race ends up being "where were you when the start gun went off" I think they won't find it that much fun. The question on the poll, which I'll suggest for fall RC meeting if it gets enough support, is to allow this start with no other changes to rules, by waiver, for regionals, so we can build some experience and answer the above questions. I know that "real" grand prix have all sorts of other rules like start lines, assigned tasks, and 0/0 finishes, but we need to KISS and not go writing a whole additional rule book. And the point really is not to create a "real" fire-eating grand prix, but to see if starting at the same time produces a more enjoyable race by eliminating start time games and leeching, without introducing safety or other problems. I hope you put your comments on the poll John Cochrane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you know the start time is going to be when the "gate opens" (to use familiar terminology), pilots will need pay more attention to their positioning than they have in previous starting formats. GP starts will change (for the better I think) the way we will all need to think about starting for sure. Much like sailing, the start will be more important than it has been in soaring.
The key is to have the CD give something like a 30-45 minute countdown (depending on the strength of the day) so that everyone is able to prepare themselves to get into the best possible position as the start time nears. No excuses are worthwhile if that kind of lead time is offered to all pilots (countdown starting 15 minutes after last launch I imagine). I agree that if the CD just says...GO, with little warning, it might be seen by some (many) as unfair. But that is not how it should happen, ever. Also, it will be fairly easy to catch the gaggle if you get a late or low start. The gaggles will be together from the get go but will thin out quickly. You still need to BEAT THE GAGGLE if you want to win or even place well!!! So this concept might actually work out really well to reduce leeching and improve "racing" even if the gaggle exists early. I would actually think that starting a minute back to see where everyone goes first would be an advantage, for example. Pick the faster gaggle, try to catch and pass it, and go for it by trying to get ahead and extend your lead. The great part of GP is that you have less room for error. Great flying is rewarded, mistakes or sticking in the gaggle is punished greatly as you can end up in the back of the pack pretty quickly! This GP concept might have more merit that we all imagine. We will learn more as we all try it over the winter and in the future! Clearly their is a reason why the GP idea has been so successful at the top levels of our sport. ITS FUN. ITS AWESOME. ITS EXCITING!!! Come on boys. Get yourselves down to Florida for a weekend! Schedule here --- https://sites.google.com/site/sgpflusa/schedule Sean 7T |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you know the start time is going to be when the "gate opens" (to use familiar terminology), pilots will need pay more attention to their positioning than they have in previous starting formats. GP starts will change (for the better I think) the way we will all need to think about starting for sure. Much like sailing, the start will be more important than it has been in soaring.
The key is to have the CD give something like a 30-45 minute countdown (depending on the strength of the day) so that everyone is able to prepare themselves to get into the best possible position as the start time nears. No excuses are worthwhile if that kind of lead time is offered to all pilots (countdown starting 15 minutes after last launch I imagine). I agree that if the CD just says...GO, with little warning, it might be seen by some (many) as unfair. But that is not how it should happen, ever. Also, it will be fairly easy to catch the gaggle if you get a late or low start. The gaggles will be together from the get go but will thin out quickly. You still need to BEAT THE GAGGLE if you want to win or even place well!!! So this concept might actually work out really well to reduce leeching and improve "racing" even if the gaggle exists early. I would actually think that starting a minute back to see where everyone goes first would be an advantage, for example. Pick the faster gaggle, try to catch and pass it, and go for it by trying to get ahead and extend your lead. The great part of GP is that you have less room for error. Great flying is rewarded, mistakes or sticking in the gaggle is punished greatly as you can end up in the back of the pack pretty quickly! This GP concept might have even more merit than we all imagine. We will learn more as we all try it over the winter and in the future! Clearly there is a reason why the GP idea has been so successful at the top levels of our sport. ITS FUN! ITS RACING! ITS EXCITING!!! Come on boys. Get yourselves down to Florida for a weekend! Schedule here --- https://sites.google.com/site/sgpflusa/schedule |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 3, 2013 8:52:25 AM UTC-4, wrote:
Agreed. A set start time eliminates gaggling and leeching. Our current timed start was developed because historically you needed to fly through the gate, and the gate could not handle everyone at the same time. No more gate, and a wide start area makes starting everyone at the same time a bit more practical. The appeal of ending start gate roulette and leeching is very high. There are a lot of open questions. Yes, how many gliders can we safely handle. Here the issue is the first few gagggles, which will inevitably have most of the fleet. My sense like yours is that 10-15 is a reasonable maximum. Larger numbers may be safe too. At world contests everyone also leaves at the same time in a big gaggle of 40 or more, they just wait a few hours to do it! Another question is whether pilots will think it's fair to start everyone at the same time. I often seem to coast around for hours, then suddenly I'm at 2000' struggling when it's time to go. We don't always or even often fly in such predictable conditions that everyone can be right at MSH at the edge of the cylinder when it's time to go. One might say, well, that's the luck of the draw,but pilots have to like the format and if the whole race ends up being "where were you when the start gun went off" I think they won't find it that much fun. The question on the poll, which I'll suggest for fall RC meeting if it gets enough support, is to allow this start with no other changes to rules, by waiver, for regionals, so we can build some experience and answer the above questions. I know that "real" grand prix have all sorts of other rules like start lines, assigned tasks, and 0/0 finishes, but we need to KISS and not go writing a whole additional rule book. And the point really is not to create a "real" fire-eating grand prix, but to see if starting at the same time produces a more enjoyable race by eliminating start time games and leeching, without introducing safety or other problems. I hope you put your comments on the poll John Cochrane From what have observed, the effect is more the opposite. First, it makes it the good tactic to start and stay with the group as much as possible. Then the objective is to be the high guy in the last thermal. Beat everybody home and you win. It is remarkably hard to beat a fast gaggle, but very easy to be soundly beaten by it. As for the start, if you are in the wrong place and low, you're pretty much hosed unless you have a remarkable flight. It does have the favorable characteristic of eliminating the painful game of trying to out wait the group so as to start last in the gaggle. The attraction , and a very real one for some(many?), is the sense of racing because the pilot sees the other gliders he is competing with. Another view UH |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Round 4 of the 2013-14 Florida Sailplane Grand Prix series begins in just 10 days.
Should be a strong turnout. Website: https://sites.google.com/site/sgpflusa Schedule: https://sites.google.com/site/sgpflusa/schedule |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Brits have a different approach for club use of the grand prix approach.. Accommodates gliders of different handicaps but retains the horse race start and the first past the post winner. They do it by varying the diameter of the beer can from the turn point.
As I understand it, the lower the handicap the glider has a larger beer can (ie, less distance to fly) than a higher handicap glider. The latest news from the Brit developer is that SeeYou now has adapted its software to cope with such an event. I believe that the Brit software was offered to Florida, but not used. On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:14:16 PM UTC-6, WB wrote: Huge thanks to the folks at Seminole Lake Gliderport and to Andy McQuigg for conceiving of and hosting the first Florida Grand Prix. The wet weather relented on Sunday and we got a beautiful blue sky full of cu's and a well-called task to match. I won't recount the race or results. That's for the organizers. I will say that the GP format worked well and was tremendous fun to fly. I have no problem with the conventional glider race format, but the GP does make for a very enjoyable and satisfying change. Everyone starting together and flying in the same air is great. There is less incentive for leeching in the GP. One can't win by following, at some point you have to physically get out ahead of your competitors. We had a max start height and a minimum finish height, so no safety issues there. The only safety issue I saw was my own stupidity regarding the start. I noodled around and ended up a couple of miles on the wrong side of the line too close to the gate opening time for my class. Scooting back to the line, I was not thinking about the class that was just starting so I was head-on to them. Really dumb on my part. The start line is not very wide, so it would have been much smarter to have flown around the end. No rules needed, just remind everyone to stay out from in front of the start line. WB --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Sailplane Grand Prix Race Sep 27-29 at Seminole Lake | [email protected] | Soaring | 38 | October 20th 13 04:23 AM |
2nd day at Grand Prix | JMR | Soaring | 1 | January 10th 10 06:19 PM |
Ely Grand Prix | BB | Soaring | 2 | July 8th 06 01:36 AM |
Grand Prix 06 / 07 | Mal | Soaring | 0 | May 2nd 06 01:14 AM |