A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th 04, 06:40 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS Question

In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Thanks...

Chuck


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #2  
Old November 6th 04, 06:44 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified
for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Certified GPSs are certified. Uncertified GPSs are not.

Handhelds cannot be certified. Panel-mounted ones can be, but are not
always.

I'm surprised that you were taught any differently "several years" ago,
since GPS isn't all that new a technology anymore. Just how many years ago
WAS that?

Pete


  #3  
Old November 6th 04, 06:56 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified
for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Certified GPSs are certified. Uncertified GPSs are not.

Handhelds cannot be certified. Panel-mounted ones can be, but are not
always.

I'm surprised that you were taught any differently "several years" ago,
since GPS isn't all that new a technology anymore. Just how many years

ago
WAS that?

Pete



It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received a
poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's (off
campus)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #4  
Old November 6th 04, 07:33 PM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck" wrote in
m:


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not
certified for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Certified GPSs are certified. Uncertified GPSs are not.

Handhelds cannot be certified. Panel-mounted ones can be, but are
not always.

I'm surprised that you were taught any differently "several years"
ago, since GPS isn't all that new a technology anymore. Just how
many years

ago
WAS that?

Pete



It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I
received a poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to
pass the O&P's (off campus)


There were plenty of GPS approaches in use in 2002.




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #5  
Old November 6th 04, 08:09 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
. 145...
"Chuck" wrote in
m:


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not
certified for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?

Certified GPSs are certified. Uncertified GPSs are not.

Handhelds cannot be certified. Panel-mounted ones can be, but are
not always.

I'm surprised that you were taught any differently "several years"
ago, since GPS isn't all that new a technology anymore. Just how
many years

ago
WAS that?

Pete



It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I
received a poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to
pass the O&P's (off campus)


There were plenty of GPS approaches in use in 2002.


Hmmm... I guess that proves that my A&P school sucked!


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #6  
Old November 6th 04, 08:50 PM
Blanche
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Which school so we can avoid it?

  #7  
Old November 7th 04, 04:04 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chuck wrote:

Hmmm... I guess that proves that my A&P school sucked!


Don't know about that, but they were definitely wrong about GPS.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #8  
Old November 6th 04, 09:37 PM
Schmoe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck" wrote in message
m...

whack


It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received a
poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's
(off
campus)



I hope you are not working as an A&P. If you are, don't quit your real job.


  #9  
Old November 6th 04, 09:44 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Schmoe" wrote in message
. net...
"Chuck" wrote in message
m...

whack


It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received

a
poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's
(off
campus)



I hope you are not working as an A&P. If you are, don't quit your real

job.



No, I am not working as an A&P.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #10  
Old November 6th 04, 10:12 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Schmoe" wrote in message
. net...
"Chuck" wrote in message
m...

whack


It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received

a
poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's
(off
campus)



I hope you are not working as an A&P. If you are, don't quit your real

job.



Speaking of, out of 25 in our class, I would trust maybe 5 people (including
me, of course) to actually work on an aircraft.

One guy got arrested for drug possession a little while into our 2 year
course, and by the time the 2 years were up, he was working for AA. Another
(suspected - heard him talk about it but never saw it) drug user went to
work for GE Online services.

There were several more that I suspect had a drug habits and several that I
know for a fact have alcohol problems.

Some were just plain ignorant. One guy, I had to show him how to tighten the
chuck on a drill. He had no clue!

In Aviation Science class (if I remember correctly), in the math portion,
the instructor would have each of the 25 students go to the board and do
basic adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. We each had to do 3 or
4 problems of each. This took the entire 2 hour class period.

In Assembly and Rigging, we flew paper airplanes the entire 2 hour class
period. Same instructor as above. Now don't get me wrong, I feel that paper
airplanes are probably a good aid in teaching aerodynamics, but for 2 hours,
and no explanation of aerodynamics???

Most of the instructors had no business teaching aviation. They may be good
in their fields, but they were not good *instructors*.

In basic electricity, I learned more in one day from a substitute
instructor, than I did the whole semester with our regular instructor. We
spent 1, yes, one day learning AC electricity. Same instructor also taught
welding. During the first class period, he informed us that he is not a
welder and knows nothing about welding. I saw him try to weld, and I believe
him! I would show him a welding project and ask what he thought. He would
say that it looked great and to turn it in. I would turn it in and would get
a 70 on it.

Sorry.... I'm on a roll now...

I'm sorry, but that place was a joke.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime John Piloting 5 November 20th 03 09:40 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Partnership Question Harry Gordon Owning 4 August 16th 03 11:23 PM
Got my ticket.... now what (the cross-country question) bdl Piloting 6 July 13th 03 02:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.