![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday I saw a cargo jet (a major air express company) come to what
seemed like a dead stop in midair as it was making its ascent. After about 20 - 30 seconds of hanging without dropping out of the sky, it continued climbing and apparently did not crash. There's been nothing about it in the local news but I've still been very concerned. Could someone here explain how such a thing is possible? Some details: the temperature was about 50 degrees F, the sky was mostly clear, and the time was around 0645. I was traveling by car at about 40 MPH on a street that is parallel to a regular flight path. From this street it's common to see 3 or 4 planes per minute either climbing or descending; the airport is about a mile or two away from this particular street. As I was moving relatively slowly compared to the how fast the jet should have been moving, I noticed that I was gaining on it. I quickly eyeballed the area for tall buildings and other geographical reference points so I could be sure that I had a good perspective and wasn't just "seeing things". The object was either not moving or it was moving *very* slowly, and it was not a helicopter. For a few seconds I was stopped at an intersection looking at this hanging plane and at the people in the other cars around me. No one else seemed to be paying any attention to it besides me. The main reason this bothered me so much is because had the plane fallen, it would have landed less than a half mile from where I and about 30 other running cars were, in addition to several warehouse-type buildings and auto repair garages, plus a 6 or 8 lane freeway filled with morning traffic. Since the plane had just taken off and was probably full of fuel, and was still low enough for its markings to be readable from the ground, the crash probably would have been extraordinarily disastrous. I've done a lot of Googling to try to get an understanding of what I saw and really haven't learned anything meaningful. I'm hoping someone here can explain how a "regular" jet--versus a specialized military jet--can apparently stop in midair and not drop from the sky. As a daily traveler near a major metro airport, I'd really like to be reassured that this is not a common occurrence. Debbie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DM wrote in
: Yesterday I saw a cargo jet (a major air express company) come to what seemed like a dead stop in midair as it was making its ascent. After about 20 - 30 seconds of hanging without dropping out of the sky, it continued climbing and apparently did not crash. There's been nothing about it in the local news but I've still been very concerned. Could someone here explain how such a thing is possible? Some details: the temperature was about 50 degrees F, the sky was mostly clear, and the time was around 0645. I was traveling by car at about 40 MPH on a street that is parallel to a regular flight path. From this street it's common to see 3 or 4 planes per minute either climbing or descending; the airport is about a mile or two away from this particular street. As I was moving relatively slowly compared to the how fast the jet should have been moving, I noticed that I was gaining on it. I quickly eyeballed the area for tall buildings and other geographical reference points so I could be sure that I had a good perspective and wasn't just "seeing things". The object was either not moving or it was moving *very* slowly, and it was not a helicopter. For a few seconds I was stopped at an intersection looking at this hanging plane and at the people in the other cars around me. No one else seemed to be paying any attention to it besides me. The main reason this bothered me so much is because had the plane fallen, it would have landed less than a half mile from where I and about 30 other running cars were, in addition to several warehouse-type buildings and auto repair garages, plus a 6 or 8 lane freeway filled with morning traffic. Since the plane had just taken off and was probably full of fuel, and was still low enough for its markings to be readable from the ground, the crash probably would have been extraordinarily disastrous. I've done a lot of Googling to try to get an understanding of what I saw and really haven't learned anything meaningful. I'm hoping someone here can explain how a "regular" jet--versus a specialized military jet--can apparently stop in midair and not drop from the sky. As a daily traveler near a major metro airport, I'd really like to be reassured that this is not a common occurrence. Debbie It is just your perception, and the relative size of the plane, verses the size your brain thinks it "out to be". The plane was likely also either angled at something less than a 45degree angle either toward you, or awayfrom you making it difficult to percieve movement. It was not hovering or anything like it. BeaglePig |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , BeaglePig wrote:
It is just your perception, and the relative size of the plane, verses the size your brain thinks it "out to be". The plane was likely also either angled at something less than a 45degree angle either toward you, or awayfrom you making it difficult to percieve movement. Especially the giant Antanovs - they look like they are barely moving on approach, despite really moving at 150 knots or so. By comparison, a C140 approaching at 55 knots looks like it's just racing along. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dylan Smith wrote: Especially the giant Antanovs - they look like they are barely moving on approach, despite really moving at 150 knots or so. By comparison, a C140 approaching at 55 knots looks like it's just racing along. I remember reading something about this. The conclusion was that we perceive speed as a function of aircraft lengths per second. So a large jet, such as a 747, seems to be crawling, while a smaller aircraft, such as a Lear, will seem to be moving much faster while actually at the same speed. Recalculate their speed in terms of aircraft lengths per second, and you can see the correlation, since a 747 is several Lears long. I would imagine you'd experience the same thing if you were to compare the visual perception of the speeds of an Amtrak train and a fast car travelling at the same rate. - Nathan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Gilliatt wrote:
In article , Dylan Smith wrote: Especially the giant Antanovs - they look like they are barely moving on approach, despite really moving at 150 knots or so. By comparison, a C140 approaching at 55 knots looks like it's just racing along. I remember reading something about this. The conclusion was that we perceive speed as a function of aircraft lengths per second. So a large jet, such as a 747, seems to be crawling, while a smaller aircraft, such as a Lear, will seem to be moving much faster while actually at the same speed. Recalculate their speed in terms of aircraft lengths per second, and you can see the correlation, since a 747 is several Lears long. I would imagine you'd experience the same thing if you were to compare the visual perception of the speeds of an Amtrak train and a fast car travelling at the same rate. - Nathan The vehicle length per second is often cited as a reason of why motorcycle racing is so exciting to watch. The bikes are tiny in comparison to cars, so they look like they're going even faster than a car going the same speed. It is quite thrilling to see these racers pushing the edge while scraping the ground with their knee pucks! -Aviv |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DM writes:
Yesterday I saw a cargo jet (a major air express company) come to what seemed like a dead stop in midair as it was making its ascent. After about 20 - 30 seconds of hanging without dropping out of the sky, it continued climbing and apparently did not crash. There's been nothing about it in the local news but I've still been very concerned. Could someone here explain how such a thing is possible? Some details: the temperature was about 50 degrees F, the sky was mostly clear, and the time was around 0645. I was traveling by car at about 40 MPH on a street that is parallel to a regular flight path. From this street it's common to see 3 or 4 planes per minute either climbing or descending; the airport is about a mile or two away from this particular street. One detail you left out -- how windy was it? I'm going to guess it was a really windy day. If the plane was taking off into a strong headwind then it would not have to go nearly as fast (relative to the ground) to stay in the air. The only thing the plane cares about is how fast it is going relative to the wind (airspeed). You may have seen a plane which was travelling at a much slower groundspeed than you are used to seeing, and thought it was almost stopped as a result. Also, if seems to be windy at ground level where you are, it may be much windier once you get up above any trees/buildings/etc which only slow the wind down. Chris -- Chris Colohan Email: PGP: finger Web: www.colohan.com Phone: (412)268-4751 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christopher Brian Colohan wrote:
DM writes: Yesterday I saw a cargo jet (a major air express company) come to what seemed like a dead stop in midair as it was making its ascent. After about 20 - 30 seconds of hanging without dropping out of the sky, it continued climbing and apparently did not crash. There's been nothing about it in the local news but I've still been very concerned. Could someone here explain how such a thing is possible? Some details: the temperature was about 50 degrees F, the sky was mostly clear, and the time was around 0645. I was traveling by car at about 40 MPH on a street that is parallel to a regular flight path. From this street it's common to see 3 or 4 planes per minute either climbing or descending; the airport is about a mile or two away from this particular street. One detail you left out -- how windy was it? I'm going to guess it was a really windy day. If the plane was taking off into a strong headwind then it would not have to go nearly as fast (relative to the ground) to stay in the air. The only thing the plane cares about is how fast it is going relative to the wind (airspeed). You may have seen a plane which was travelling at a much slower groundspeed than you are used to seeing, and thought it was almost stopped as a result. Also, if seems to be windy at ground level where you are, it may be much windier once you get up above any trees/buildings/etc which only slow the wind down. Chris interesting, but no, it wasn't particularly windy on the ground. Debbie |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DM wrote: interesting, but no, it wasn't particularly windy on the ground. I have the winds aloft forecast for yesterday morning. Where was this? George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
DM wrote: interesting, but no, it wasn't particularly windy on the ground. I have the winds aloft forecast for yesterday morning. Where was this? Phoenix George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. Debbie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DM wrote: Phoenix So much for that idea. Winds at 5,000' above sea level were out of the northwest at 5 knots. At 10,000' they were out of the west at 20 knots. It's unlikely that a 20 knot headwind made much difference in the appearance of the speed of a large plane. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rental policy | Robert | Piloting | 83 | May 13th 04 05:29 PM |
I need some advice on buying my own plane BEFORE training... | Anthony L | Piloting | 6 | April 22nd 04 11:13 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |