![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder what those are in the background?
Regards Syke |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Syke wrote in news:AgNqw.381617$WK6.209157
@fx02.am4: I wonder what those are in the background? Regards Syke Grumman Trackers ? perhaps ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/01/2015 17:28, john szalay wrote:
Syke wrote in news:AgNqw.381617$WK6.209157 @fx02.am4: I wonder what those are in the background? Regards Syke Grumman Trackers ? perhaps ? It's the very short span wings that's puzzling. That's a Royal Navy Meteor, so I'm thinking Sea Prince, but the wings are still too short for that; more like the wings on the OV Bronco. Regards Syke |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-01-06 18:11:58 +0000, Syke said:
On 06/01/2015 17:28, john szalay wrote: Syke wrote in news:AgNqw.381617$WK6.209157 @fx02.am4: I wonder what those are in the background? Regards Syke Grumman Trackers ? perhaps ? It's the very short span wings that's puzzling. That's a Royal Navy Meteor, so I'm thinking Sea Prince, but the wings are still too short for that; more like the wings on the OV Bronco. Those definitely are not OV-10's. Those have a twin boom twin vertical stabilizer design the AC in the background have a single vertical stabilizer. Also they have a fatter fuselage than the OV-10. I think that first guess was correct, S2E Tracker. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Syke wrote in news:RzVqw.498095$7A5.464231
@fx17.am4: On 06/01/2015 17:28, john szalay wrote: Syke wrote in news:AgNqw.381617 $WK6.209157 @fx02.am4: I wonder what those are in the background? Regards Syke Grumman Trackers ? perhaps ? It's the very short span wings that's puzzling. That's a Royal Navy Meteor, so I'm thinking Sea Prince, but the wings are still too short for that; more like the wings on the OV Bronco. Regards Syke How about Percival Pembrokes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-01-07 03:32:31 +0000, john szalay john.szalayatatt.net said:
Syke wrote in news:RzVqw.498095$7A5.464231 @fx17.am4: On 06/01/2015 17:28, john szalay wrote: Syke wrote in news:AgNqw.381617 $WK6.209157 @fx02.am4: I wonder what those are in the background? Regards Syke Grumman Trackers ? perhaps ? It's the very short span wings that's puzzling. That's a Royal Navy Meteor, so I'm thinking Sea Prince, but the wings are still too short for that; more like the wings on the OV Bronco. Regards Syke How about Percival Pembrokes That is a very likely candidate given that its service starting in the mid-1950's would make it a Meteor contemporary. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UK2 WH169 Gloster MeteorT7 1960-07 Cranwell PeteCorbellPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 12th 12 11:57 AM |
UK2 WH132 Gloster MeteorT7 1960-06 LittleRissington.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 12th 12 11:57 AM |
UK2 WG979 Gloster MeteorT7 1960 JDunhamPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 12th 12 11:57 AM |
UK2 WA725 Gloster MeteorT7 1960-05 Wethersfield PeterCorbellPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 1 | August 10th 12 10:47 PM |
UK2 WA725 Gloster MeteorT7 1960-05 Wethersfield PeterCorbellPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 10th 12 12:51 PM |