![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe this has been covered in RAS but I couldn't find it. I looked through two documents about the spacing of FLARM antennas, specifically the FLARM A and ADS-B antennas. Obviously, the thing to avoid is the transmitting of FLARM data (A antenna) interfering with ADS-B (or GPS) reception.
The FLARM document "PowerFLARM_Application_Note_ANTENNAS1.pdf"* has the following information about antenna spacing. It doesn't mention a minimum distance between the FLARM A and ADS-B antennas; Keep antennas separated as far as possible! Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM A and FLARM B port: 1ft (0.3 m) Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM A port and GPS antenna: 1ft (0.3 m) Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM B port and GPS antenna: 4in (0.1 m) Min. distance between ADS-B / XPDR antenna and GPS antenna: 4in (0.1 m) The FLARM Core V2.0 manual** says the following in the section on ADS-B antennas; "This antenna should be placed at least 30cm/1ft away from the FLARM antennas. The FLARM antennas have priority over this antenna for best placement." 1 foot (30cm) spacing within our tight glider cockpits is going to be a struggle. Based on the FLARM portable (might not be the best example) the two antennas are only 2.5" (0.06 m) apart. Anyone have more information on this spacing conundrum? Thanks, John "OHM" * http://cumulus-soaring.com/flarm/Pow..._ANTENNAS1.pdf. I don't see it on the FLARM.org web site. Was it superseded? ** https://flarm.com/wp-content/uploads...anual-2.00.pdf |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 8:09:32 AM UTC-7, OHM Ω wrote:
Maybe this has been covered in RAS but I couldn't find it. I looked through two documents about the spacing of FLARM antennas, specifically the FLARM A and ADS-B antennas. Obviously, the thing to avoid is the transmitting of FLARM data (A antenna) interfering with ADS-B (or GPS) reception. The FLARM document "PowerFLARM_Application_Note_ANTENNAS1.pdf"* has the following information about antenna spacing. It doesn't mention a minimum distance between the FLARM A and ADS-B antennas; Keep antennas separated as far as possible! Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM A and FLARM B port: 1ft (0.3 m) Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM A port and GPS antenna: 1ft (0.3 m) Min. distance between RF antenna on FLARM B port and GPS antenna: 4in (0.1 m) Min. distance between ADS-B / XPDR antenna and GPS antenna: 4in (0.1 m) The FLARM Core V2.0 manual** says the following in the section on ADS-B antennas; "This antenna should be placed at least 30cm/1ft away from the FLARM antennas. The FLARM antennas have priority over this antenna for best placement.." 1 foot (30cm) spacing within our tight glider cockpits is going to be a struggle. Based on the FLARM portable (might not be the best example) the two antennas are only 2.5" (0.06 m) apart. Anyone have more information on this spacing conundrum? Thanks, John "OHM" * http://cumulus-soaring.com/flarm/Pow..._ANTENNAS1.pdf. I don't see it on the FLARM.org web site. Was it superseded? ** https://flarm.com/wp-content/uploads...anual-2.00.pdf Dave Nadler's published some guidance. Check the third article down on this link. http://www.nadler.com/public/NadlerSoaringIndex.html Cheers, Craig |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks ... but...
Dave contributed heavily to this in-depth FLARM® discussion on GliderPilot.org Bad Link FLARM antenna installation notes (replaces the FLARM Antenna Hall of Shame web page) Same as the document I referenced in my original diatribe Thanks, John "OHM" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I might have to disagree with FLARM's statement, "The FLARM antennas have priority over this [ADS-B] antenna for best placement."
I think that early detection of a 1,000 lb FLARM equipped glider closing at 100kts should probably take a back seat to early detection of a 62,000 lb ADS-B equipped 737 closing at 400kts. Just sayin' There are caveats to that statement of course. There are low risk and high risk ADS-B traffic areas. But you aren't going to move your (FLARM and ADS-B) antennas around based on where you are flying this week. So I would think that you should place your antenna based on the worse case threat scenario = a high speed and hefty flying bomb. Just sayin' My $0.02 - John "OHM" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 2:00:03 PM UTC-7, OHM Ω wrote:
I might have to disagree with FLARM's statement, "The FLARM antennas have priority over this [ADS-B] antenna for best placement." I think that early detection of a 1,000 lb FLARM equipped glider closing at 100kts should probably take a back seat to early detection of a 62,000 lb ADS-B equipped 737 closing at 400kts. Just sayin' There are caveats to that statement of course. There are low risk and high risk ADS-B traffic areas. But you aren't going to move your (FLARM and ADS-B) antennas around based on where you are flying this week. So I would think that you should place your antenna based on the worse case threat scenario = a high speed and hefty flying bomb. Just sayin' My $0.02 - John "OHM" The reason the Flarm antennas are more critical is because the power of the flarm signal is very low compared to the ADS-B signal. Richard www.craggyaero.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Richard (Craggy Aero) said, and:
The placement of a transmit or transceiver antenna will almost always be more critical than a receive only antenna. This is due to obstructions or interference causing nulls (areas where the transmitted signal is suppressed or blocked) and impedance mismatch causing high SWR, i.e. power to be reflected back down the transmission line (coax) and wasted instead of being transmitted by the antenna. Thus antenna installation for the PF A antenna is extremely important as it has a minuscule output power of only a few milliwatts (I read 10 mw somewhere, but can't find it now). On the other hand, you could probably hold up a paper clip and receive the ADS-B signal from even a small power aircraft that has a minimum power output of 75 watts, larger aircraft 125 watts minimum, up to 500 watts max. Optimal ADS-B installation in your glider, while important, would hardly be an issue. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bumper- Good tip! Thanks!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're seeking to improve your Flarm range then moving to
a better aerial design is an option. In the crowded Alps you see many installations using the "SuperFant" antenna; see link below. This aerial is both small and slim and so does not impede the view when mounted on the front of the instrument panel, high just under the canopy. My experience is that it has much superior performance to the standard simple Flarm dipole. It's available with custom length cable. Of course the position of the Flarm aerial is critical! There are some truly terrible installations out there.... http://www.gliderdesignparts.de/ant_flarm.html I always found their service to be fast and relable; usual disclaimers. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 2:45:06 PM UTC-7, Dave Walsh wrote:
If you're seeking to improve your Flarm range then moving to a better aerial design is an option. In the crowded Alps you see many installations using the "SuperFant" antenna; see link below. This aerial is both small and slim and so does not impede the view when mounted on the front of the instrument panel, high just under the canopy. My experience is that it has much superior performance to the standard simple Flarm dipole. It's available with custom length cable. Of course the position of the Flarm aerial is critical! There are some truly terrible installations out there.... http://www.gliderdesignparts.de/ant_flarm.html I always found their service to be fast and relable; usual disclaimers. Nice antenna frequency frequency different in Europe. Richard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 2:45:06 PM UTC-7, Dave Walsh wrote:
If you're seeking to improve your Flarm range then moving to a better aerial design is an option. In the crowded Alps you see many installations using the "SuperFant" antenna; see link below. This aerial is both small and slim and so does not impede the view when mounted on the front of the instrument panel, high just under the canopy. My experience is that it has much superior performance to the standard simple Flarm dipole. It's available with custom length cable. Of course the position of the Flarm aerial is critical! There are some truly terrible installations out there.... http://www.gliderdesignparts.de/ant_flarm.html I always found their service to be fast and relable; usual disclaimers. Nice antenna frequency different in Europe. Richard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FLARM Antenna Hall of Shame? | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 4 | July 21st 14 09:22 AM |
FLARM antenna mounts for ASG-29 | Sean F (F2) | Soaring | 20 | September 11th 13 02:35 PM |
Nice FLARM antenna mount in ASG-29 | Dave Nadler | Soaring | 8 | April 6th 13 09:49 PM |
Again with FLARM antenna questions. | brianDG303[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | July 23rd 12 05:35 PM |
FLARM antenna installation | Kevin Neave | Soaring | 5 | January 16th 07 06:53 PM |