A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Commercial Flight Hit an Absurdly Fast 801 MPH While Flying Over the United States



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 20th 19, 02:54 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Miloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,291
Default A Commercial Flight Hit an Absurdly Fast 801 MPH While Flying Over the United States

https://jalopnik.com/a-commercial-fl...ile-1832733268

A Virgin Atlantic flight making the grueling journey from Los Angeles to London
yesterday hit a ground speed of at least 801 mph, thanks to a streak of
fast-moving air in the jet stream over Pennsylvania. You’re probably wondering
how, as breaking the sound barrier over land is illegal, but despite surpassing
the speed required to break the sound barrier, there was no sonic boom.

And no, the Virgin Atlantic flight wasn’t in some super-special mystery jet that
you haven’t heard of. And no, they’re not bringing the Concorde back. Here’s
what happened.

The 801 mph ground speed of the Boeing 787-9 was reported on the flight tracker
system Flight Aware, and was tweeted out by meteorology teacher Stu Ostro:

The typical cruising speed for a plane of this size is only around 560 mph,
which is a long way off of the speed of sound’s 767 mph (although the speed of
sound does vary based on altitude, air temperature, pressure, and on and on, and
that 767 mph figure is based on a reading at sea level under standard
conditions).And that’s exactly why there was no sonic boom for this 801 mph
flight. I’ll let the Washington Post explain:

With a speed max currently over central Pennsylvania, airplanes flying through
the jet will either be sped up or slowed down big time, depending on their
direction of travel. It’s like the moving walkway at the airport. You have your
own forward speed, but if you continue this velocity in an environment that is
itself moving, it can propel you at an impressive rate.

[...]

Commercial aircraft ordinarily can’t break the sound barrier, because they’re
not designed to handle the sudden increase in drag and other aerodynamic effects
associated with those speeds. Despite a ground speed that high, the plane didn’t
come close to reaching that threshold because it was embedded in the swiftly
moving air.

So the plane, in this case, was essentially carried along at those speeds by the
air around it, so that while it’s ground speed was faster than the speed of
sound, its air speed was not. Otherwise the stress of flying near or over the
speed of sound would add significant strain on the body of the plane and its
control surfaces, and potentially spell disaster. If a plane isn’t meant to go
faster than the speed of sound, then it really, really shouldn’t.

Despite not being in the jet stream over the northeast very long, the plane
managed to arrive 48 minutes early in London, and most flights headed east over
this area of North America are expected to have shorter flight times in the
coming days. Of course, any flight going the other direction will either have to
fight the wind or go around, so they’re expected to have longer flight times.

The jet streams winds are typically faster-moving in the winter, the Post
reports, because of the maximized temperature differences between the northern
and southern parts of North America.

It’d be pretty shocking to look at the flight tracker in my headrest
infotainment display on a flight like this and see anything north of 700 mph,
let alone 800 mph. The best bonus of the wind boost is that it pushes you past
Pennsylvania as fast as possible.





*

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lockheed Constellation pics 1 [01/12] - A United States Navy R7V 2 L-1249 in flight The L 1249 used Pratt & Whitney T34 turboprop engines in place of the Wright R 3350 radials.jpg (1/1) Miloch Aviation Photos 0 July 12th 17 02:44 PM
United States Navy markings? Jack G[_2_] Naval Aviation 10 July 7th 08 03:32 PM
Airlines requirment in United States Monica2007 Piloting 13 August 13th 07 04:50 AM
United States information Joseph L. Hyde Soaring 13 March 23rd 05 09:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.