A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JetBlue and DIRECTV



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 05, 02:14 AM
Bucky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default JetBlue and DIRECTV

Do you think they have DIRECTV on flight 292? It was pretty ironic to
be watching your own plane on CNN.

  #2  
Old September 22nd 05, 02:42 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My assumption was just confirmed by MSNBC, the crew turned it off.

  #4  
Old September 22nd 05, 04:27 AM
Quiet Desperation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
Bucky wrote:

That's probably the best thing. Although I think if I were on that
plane, I would want ESPN or some other channels to watch to take my
mind off things.


I fly JetBlue a lot (and still will). The DirecTV dish can only track
at a certain rate, and will drop out on a large turns. Since this
flight was looping for hours...
  #6  
Old September 22nd 05, 10:18 PM
Jackal24
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bucky" wrote in news:1127411165.534306.220620
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

wrote:
My assumption was just confirmed by MSNBC, the crew turned it off.


Actually, they've corrected the initial reports. They did have the
DIRECTV turned on during the situation. They only turned it off when
they started to land. Some passengers described it as surreal, and
another thought he was in a dream.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/22/airliner.emergency.ap/


Whether or not to turn off the directv was probably a difficult choice by
the crew. I'm assuming that it is an all or nothing deal (i.e. you can't
just block certain channels). On the one hand, if you leave it on, you get
everyone watching the scene unfold, possibly creating a panic. On the other
hand, you have to circle around for a couple of hours and turning it off
may create more of a panic as people know have nothing to do except think
about what is happening.
  #7  
Old September 22nd 05, 07:09 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The pax said it was on. It always turns off in the last couple minutes
of flight. It displays something like "Sat lost" or something. I think
its harder to keep the sat aligned once you start turning for landing.

-Robert

  #8  
Old September 22nd 05, 02:44 AM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bucky wrote:

Do you think they have DIRECTV on flight 292? It was pretty ironic to
be watching your own plane on CNN.


Yep, the large satellite dome antenna could be seen on top of the aircraft,
about 2/3's of the way down the fuselage, during the news coverage.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #9  
Old September 22nd 05, 08:01 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TV news is full of crap. They went on and on about dumping fuel
(something the A320 can't do) and airline pilots being trained landing
with one or more gear missing over and over again (something denied by
a Jetblue pilot who called in).

-Robert

  #10  
Old September 22nd 05, 11:02 PM
Chris W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert M. Gary wrote:

TV news is full of crap. They went on and on about dumping fuel
(something the A320 can't do) and airline pilots being trained landing
with one or more gear missing over and over again (something denied by
a Jetblue pilot who called in).


My favorite part was where they talked about them landing on the main
gear first as if it were not normal to do so. The first report I heard
said they were going to do a "soft field" landing. They also made it
sound like it would be an easier landing if the problem was with one of
the main gear. Anyone with even the most basic understanding of physics
knows that's ridiculous. The landing it's self was anticlimactic
though. I guess that landing gear structure is pretty strong, I would
have thought the tire would have been worn off sooner and there been a
chance of something catching in one of the expansion joints in the
concrete that would cause it to fail.

--
Chris W

Gift Giving Made Easy
Get the gifts you want &
give the gifts they want
One stop wish list for any gift,
from anywhere, for any occasion!
http://thewishzone.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.