A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TSA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 05, 11:35 AM
Ash Wyllie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

An interesting article in the Washingtom Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110101291.html

-ash
Cthulhu in 2005!
Why wait for nature?


  #2  
Old November 2nd 05, 03:45 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

On 2 Nov 2005 6:35:34 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in
::


An interesting article in the Washingtom Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110101291.html



To operate at any point in this zone, pilots must go through
unique and elaborate procedures. They must file a flight plan
before entering the ADIZ and must do so by telephone, often having
to wait 10 or 20 minutes on hold rather than just spending a
minute or two to file the plan via computer.

Once in the airplane, pilots must contact a controller for a code
to identify their airplane on radar -- and must often guess the
frequency on which to reach the controller, since it changes. If
the flight plan has been lost in the system, as often occurs, they
may have to land at an airport outside the ADIZ and start over
again. If radio congestion means they can't reach a controller,
they must circle outside the ADIZ border, avoiding other pilots in
the same predicament.

These might seem trivial burdens if they made sense for security,
but they don't. The ADIZ plan displays that special combination of
other early, panicky post-Sept. 11 moves: It doesn't hinder
terrorists, but it complicates life for everyone else. What mainly
stops terrorists from using small aircraft is that they're such
inefficient delivery vehicles. My small propeller airplane, which
I may not legally fly as close to the Capitol as Tysons Corner,
can carry one-sixth as many pounds of cargo -- or bombs -- as my
family car, which I drive close to major buildings every day.

And for the private jets that are large enough to do damage, the
ADIZ offers no real protection. Once a jet is cleared into the
ADIZ, what protects the White House and Capitol is what would
protect them without an ADIZ: missile batteries on the rooftops
and bunkers in the basement.

Perhaps a good compromise would be to require jet aircraft to comply
with the DC ADIZ. After all, turbine aircraft get about 750 feet to
the gallon of fuel, so they carry a copious amounts. Fortunately,
most jet powered aircraft are on IFR flight plans, so they wouldn't be
impacted very much.

Just a thought.

  #3  
Old November 2nd 05, 04:45 PM
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

Is my memory failing, or didn't this one make the headlines:

"Of the thousands of ADIZ cases that have tied up FAA lawyers and often led
to sanctions against pilots, exactly one was found to involve an intentional
violation."

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On 2 Nov 2005 6:35:34 -0500, "Ash Wyllie" wrote in
::


An interesting article in the Washingtom Post.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...01/AR200511010

1291.html


To operate at any point in this zone, pilots must go through
unique and elaborate procedures. They must file a flight plan
before entering the ADIZ and must do so by telephone, often having
to wait 10 or 20 minutes on hold rather than just spending a
minute or two to file the plan via computer.

Once in the airplane, pilots must contact a controller for a code
to identify their airplane on radar -- and must often guess the
frequency on which to reach the controller, since it changes. If
the flight plan has been lost in the system, as often occurs, they
may have to land at an airport outside the ADIZ and start over
again. If radio congestion means they can't reach a controller,
they must circle outside the ADIZ border, avoiding other pilots in
the same predicament.

These might seem trivial burdens if they made sense for security,
but they don't. The ADIZ plan displays that special combination of
other early, panicky post-Sept. 11 moves: It doesn't hinder
terrorists, but it complicates life for everyone else. What mainly
stops terrorists from using small aircraft is that they're such
inefficient delivery vehicles. My small propeller airplane, which
I may not legally fly as close to the Capitol as Tysons Corner,
can carry one-sixth as many pounds of cargo -- or bombs -- as my
family car, which I drive close to major buildings every day.

And for the private jets that are large enough to do damage, the
ADIZ offers no real protection. Once a jet is cleared into the
ADIZ, what protects the White House and Capitol is what would
protect them without an ADIZ: missile batteries on the rooftops
and bunkers in the basement.

Perhaps a good compromise would be to require jet aircraft to comply
with the DC ADIZ. After all, turbine aircraft get about 750 feet to
the gallon of fuel, so they carry a copious amounts. Fortunately,
most jet powered aircraft are on IFR flight plans, so they wouldn't be
impacted very much.

Just a thought.



  #4  
Old November 4th 05, 01:33 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA


Larry Dighera wrote:
To operate at any point in this zone, pilots must go through

unique and elaborate procedures. They must file a flight plan
before entering the ADIZ and must do so by telephone, often having
to wait 10 or 20 minutes on hold rather than just spending a
minute or two to file the plan via computer.


A great way to check for "foreign voice accents" Follow up questions
can include this
years World Series Champ, Super Bowl winner, end of Ramadan, etc.


Once in the airplane, pilots must contact a controller for a code
to identify their airplane on radar -- and must often guess the
frequency on which to reach the controller, since it changes. If
the flight plan has been lost in the system, as often occurs, they
may have to land at an airport outside the ADIZ and start over
again. If radio congestion means they can't reach a controller,
they must circle outside the ADIZ border, avoiding other pilots in
the same predicament.


FAA controllers have been short staffed since Reagan, check major hub
staffing versus budget. Ironic that DCA is RR airport.


These might seem trivial burdens if they made sense for security,
but they don't. The ADIZ plan displays that special combination of
other early, panicky post-Sept. 11 moves: It doesn't hinder
terrorists, but it complicates life for everyone else. What mainly
stops terrorists from using small aircraft is that they're such
inefficient delivery vehicles. My small propeller airplane, which
I may not legally fly as close to the Capitol as Tysons Corner,
can carry one-sixth as many pounds of cargo -- or bombs -- as my
family car, which I drive close to major buildings every day.


But your car won't drop from the sky, Kamikazi style. Easier to halt a
bio/chem
spraying car versus chasing a crop duster.


And for the private jets that are large enough to do damage, the
ADIZ offers no real protection. Once a jet is cleared into the
ADIZ, what protects the White House and Capitol is what would
protect them without an ADIZ: missile batteries on the rooftops
and bunkers in the basement.

Perhaps a good compromise would be to require jet aircraft to comply
with the DC ADIZ. After all, turbine aircraft get about 750 feet to
the gallon of fuel, so they carry a copious amounts. Fortunately,
most jet powered aircraft are on IFR flight plans, so they wouldn't be
impacted very much.

Just a thought.


Try Amtrak, just a thought, JG

  #5  
Old November 4th 05, 03:26 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

In article .com,
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
To operate at any point in this zone, pilots must go through

unique and elaborate procedures. They must file a flight plan
before entering the ADIZ and must do so by telephone, often having
to wait 10 or 20 minutes on hold rather than just spending a
minute or two to file the plan via computer.


A great way to check for "foreign voice accents" Follow up questions
can include this
years World Series Champ, Super Bowl winner, end of Ramadan, etc.


Once in the airplane, pilots must contact a controller for a code
to identify their airplane on radar -- and must often guess the
frequency on which to reach the controller, since it changes. If
the flight plan has been lost in the system, as often occurs, they
may have to land at an airport outside the ADIZ and start over
again. If radio congestion means they can't reach a controller,
they must circle outside the ADIZ border, avoiding other pilots in
the same predicament.


FAA controllers have been short staffed since Reagan, check major hub
staffing versus budget. Ironic that DCA is RR airport.


These might seem trivial burdens if they made sense for security,
but they don't. The ADIZ plan displays that special combination of
other early, panicky post-Sept. 11 moves: It doesn't hinder
terrorists, but it complicates life for everyone else. What mainly
stops terrorists from using small aircraft is that they're such
inefficient delivery vehicles. My small propeller airplane, which
I may not legally fly as close to the Capitol as Tysons Corner,
can carry one-sixth as many pounds of cargo -- or bombs -- as my
family car, which I drive close to major buildings every day.


But your car won't drop from the sky, Kamikazi style. Easier to halt a
bio/chem
spraying car versus chasing a crop duster.


And for the private jets that are large enough to do damage, the
ADIZ offers no real protection. Once a jet is cleared into the
ADIZ, what protects the White House and Capitol is what would
protect them without an ADIZ: missile batteries on the rooftops
and bunkers in the basement.

Perhaps a good compromise would be to require jet aircraft to comply
with the DC ADIZ. After all, turbine aircraft get about 750 feet to
the gallon of fuel, so they carry a copious amounts. Fortunately,
most jet powered aircraft are on IFR flight plans, so they wouldn't be
impacted very much.

Just a thought.


Try Amtrak, just a thought, JG


Go to Hell, "jgrove!" -- just a thought.
  #9  
Old November 4th 05, 03:36 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
To operate at any point in this zone, pilots must go through
unique and elaborate procedures. They must file a flight plan
before entering the ADIZ and must do so by telephone, often having
to wait 10 or 20 minutes on hold rather than just spending a
minute or two to file the plan via computer.

Once in the airplane, pilots must contact a controller for a code
to identify their airplane on radar -- and must often guess the
frequency on which to reach the controller, since it changes. If
the flight plan has been lost in the system, as often occurs, they
may have to land at an airport outside the ADIZ and start over
again. If radio congestion means they can't reach a controller,
they must circle outside the ADIZ border, avoiding other pilots in
the same predicament.


These are the same procedures that I have had to follow for a couple of
decades of island flying. These procedures are fallible. They don't stop the
occassional stray airplane from entering the US. They won't stop an
intentional busting of DC airspace.

D.


  #10  
Old November 4th 05, 01:57 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TSA

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:36:39 GMT, "Capt.Doug"
wrote in ::

They won't stop an intentional busting of DC airspace.


I don't believe that is the purpose of the DC ADIZ; it is the purpose
of the FRZ. There are SAM missiles for stopping unidentified
intentional intrusions into the FRZ. The ADIZ serves to provide
Customs with an opportunity to identify flights as friend or foe
before they penetrate the FRZ and are shot down.

It's a completely uninspired system concept that is so flawed as to be
incapable of accomplishing its purpose and only impacts the innocent.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.