A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Smooth policy????



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st 06, 07:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

Recently a thread was posted concerning a "smooth insurance policy"

What is a "smooth policy"

Thanks

Paul
N1431A


  #2  
Old March 1st 06, 07:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

Tri-Pacer wrote:

Recently a thread was posted concerning a "smooth insurance policy"

What is a "smooth policy"


A liability policy that states "minimum bodily injury and property damage
per occurrence limit of $1,000,000 for coverage bodily injury and property
damage."

This is much higher coverage than the typical liability policy.

Here's some interesting reading:

http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/189307-1.html

--
Peter
  #3  
Old March 1st 06, 07:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

What is a "smooth policy"


A liability policy that states "minimum bodily injury and property damage
per occurrence limit of $1,000,000 for coverage bodily injury and property
damage."


Minimum? That doesn't sound right. How about "maximum"?

Also, what makes it "smooth" is the absence of per-person limits, typically
$100K per person.
  #4  
Old March 1st 06, 08:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

Dave Butler wrote:

Minimum? That doesn't sound right. How about "maximum"?


Yep, my mistake.

Also, what makes it "smooth" is the absence of per-person limits, typically
$100K per person.


But there is a maximum limit of $1,000,000 payout for all claims combined,
right? Wouldn't this result in a per person limit of sorts (at least as
far as the insurance company is concerned) if more than one passenger sued
the insurance company?



--
Peter
  #5  
Old March 1st 06, 08:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

Also, what makes it "smooth" is the absence of per-person limits, typically
$100K per person.



But there is a maximum limit of $1,000,000 payout for all claims combined,
right?


Yes, if that's the smooth limit.

Wouldn't this result in a per person limit of sorts (at least as
far as the insurance company is concerned) if more than one passenger sued
the insurance company?


Effectively, yes, but there is no explicit per-person limit stated in the
policy. That's what makes it smooth, as I understand it.
  #6  
Old March 3rd 06, 03:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

It's what is generally called a "single limit" policy in
legal/insurance circles. You have a million bucks of insurance
available to pay the claims, whether one or a hndred. One claimant
might get $1, another $10.43, and the other $999,989.57; or whatever ,
so long as the total doesn't exceed $1mm. Your auto policy may be a
25/50 policy which is $50,000 of insurance but no more than $25,000 to
any one claimant. The aviation policies are sometimes quoted as
$1mm/$100m, which means that no one claim will get more than $100,000
from insurance. This type of coverage is a joke. If you crash with 3
people on board, and don't kill or injure anyone on the ground or
damage property, you only have up to $100,000 available for each
person, i.e. $300,000 of total insurance. You'd have to injure/kill 10
people to to get the $1mm of protection...highly unlikely.

  #7  
Old March 3rd 06, 09:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

Plus, in auto insurance a 25/50 policy may only have $5000 in
liability. If you hit two cars you may only have $5000 to cover teh
cars even though you have $50,000 coverage per accident.

-Robert

  #8  
Old March 6th 06, 02:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????



skym wrote:
The aviation policies are sometimes quoted as
$1mm/$100m, which means that no one claim will get more than $100,000
from insurance.



That should read "no one claim from a passenger." The full amount of
the insurance is available to anybody else.

  #9  
Old March 9th 06, 01:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

You're right as to some; others are $100m per person, wherever situated
at the fated moment. I suppose if my engine stops just after a
straight out departure from 25 here, there will be a whole lot of
people on the ground to worry about. It's just that elsewhere here in
Big Sky Country, there's soooooo much vacant real estate.

  #10  
Old March 9th 06, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Smooth policy????

You're right as to some; others are $100m per person, wherever situated
at the fated moment. I suppose if my engine stops just after a
straight out departure from 25 here, there will be a whole lot of
people on the ground to worry about. It's just that elsewhere here in
Big Sky Country, there's soooooo much vacant real estate.


People on the ground are not subject to the sublimit, just passengers.
People on the ground exercise your liability limit (usually $1
million).

-Robert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution WalterM140 Military Aviation 20 July 2nd 04 04:09 PM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 1 April 9th 04 11:25 PM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 0 April 7th 04 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.