MRB DP NOTAM

NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).

Is there a question or comment here?

Michael

wrote in message ...
NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.
---JRC---

"Michael 182" wrote in message =
news:dpI3c.224440$jk2.924040@attbi_s53...
Is there a question or comment here?
=20
Michael
=20
wrote in message =
...
NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT =
PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: =
CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, =
INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY =
26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA =
(TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).


=20

"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
news

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.


There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the NOTAM
was the first message in the thread.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
hlink.net...
=20
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
news

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.

=20
There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the =
NOTAM
was the first message in the thread.
=20
=20
Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new =
one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(
---JRC---

"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...

Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new
one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(


Go out on the ramp, face Kill Devil Hill, kneel, and recite the poem "High
Flight" three times. Then go forth and sin no more.

Michael 182 ) wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?

I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
description.

After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Peter R." wrote:

Michael 182 ) wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?

I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
description.

After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.


Correct. Since old threads die around here, I posted it anew.

Michael 182 wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?

No. You apparently didn't follow the extensive thread about this a couple of
weeks ago.

Missed it. Thanks.

Michael

wrote in message ...


Michael 182 wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?

No. You apparently didn't follow the extensive thread about this a couple
of
weeks ago.