![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just got this from the chief pilot-
"Airbus recently discovered some ribs near the engine pylon spar box that might not have received the necessary extensive heat-treatment in production prior to installation. The omission reduces the material allowable yield stress. As a consequence the non-heat treated ribs may not be able to meet all certification requirements. This is especially true for vertical loads associated with vertical gusts. No industry incidents have occurred. However, Airbus alerted operators to require strict adherence to turbulent air penetration speeds." D. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt.Doug" wrote in message ... Just got this from the chief pilot- "Airbus recently discovered some ribs near the engine pylon spar box that might not have received the necessary extensive heat-treatment in production prior to installation. The omission reduces the material allowable yield stress. As a consequence the non-heat treated ribs may not be able to meet all certification requirements. This is especially true for vertical loads associated with vertical gusts. No industry incidents have occurred. However, Airbus alerted operators to require strict adherence to turbulent air penetration speeds." Oh, that sounds JUST dandy. Any word on which models and years affected? Approximate numbers? What is their (Airbus's) strategy to rectify the problem? This sounds like another coffin nail, in Airbus's sinking ship. I wonder how many millions (billions?) the parent company and governments will have to pony up. Boeing, even with its shortcomings, is starting to sound better and better all of the time, IMHO. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: Any word on which models and years affected? Approximate numbers? What is their (Airbus's) strategy to rectify the problem? I'm sure if it affects the model you fly your company will notify you. Otherwise, you can assume your fleet is safe. -Robert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt.Doug" wrote: Just got this from the chief pilot- "Airbus recently discovered some ribs near the engine pylon spar box that might not have received the necessary extensive heat-treatment in production prior to installation. The omission reduces the material allowable yield stress. As a consequence the non-heat treated ribs may not be able to meet all certification requirements. This is especially true for vertical loads associated with vertical gusts. No industry incidents have occurred. However, Airbus alerted operators to require strict adherence to turbulent air penetration speeds." It sounds bad, but is it a big hairy deal or just a pain? How common is this sort of thing? With all the bad news coming out of EADS these days, can this news be taken as another sign of major trouble at Airbus, or is it just another "**** happens" incident that could have as easily happened to any mfr.? From the outside, it is starting to look like Airbus is flying one wing low and out of yaw trim. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in message It sounds bad, but is it a big hairy deal
or just a pain? To Airbus' credit, when they find a mistake, they readily admit it and over-compensate on the corrective actions. Besides, if an engine falls off, the plane will still fly. From the outside, it is starting to look like Airbus is flying one wing low and out of yaw trim. They have had bad press lately, but Boeing's new airplane developement has been having set-backs as well. Boeing seems to have better spin meisters to handle the press. D. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt.Doug wrote:
"Dan Luke" wrote in message It sounds bad, but is it a big hairy deal or just a pain? To Airbus' credit, when they find a mistake, they readily admit it and over-compensate on the corrective actions. Besides, if an engine falls off, the plane will still fly. Tell that to the DC-10 in Chicago a few blue moons ago. Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message Tell that to the DC-10 in Chicago a few
blue moons ago. Did Airbus build the DC-10? Does the A-320 have hydraulic lines going to the flight controls? Does American Airlines do my maintenance with a forklift? D. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt.Doug wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message Tell that to the DC-10 in Chicago a few blue moons ago. Did Airbus build the DC-10? Does the A-320 have hydraulic lines going to the flight controls? Does American Airlines do my maintenance with a forklift? Still doesn't mean that one will fly if an engine comes completely off of the airplane. No way to know what collateral damage that would cause. Have you seen this happen? Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Captn' Doug,
Different topic, same aircraft... What's the scoop with the computer reset stories? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still more Airbus woes (1) | john smith | Piloting | 11 | June 17th 06 09:42 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (3) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:37 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (2) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:35 PM |
Australia chooses Airbus tankers | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | April 16th 04 10:25 AM |
Airbus Aiming at U.S. Military Market | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 21st 03 08:55 PM |