A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 18th 06, 03:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dico
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

Hello,

I'm wondering if its legal to put a 2nd artificial horizon in the plane
as a backup if it is not certified? We may want to put one in the
plane as a backup... but just wanted to know if we need a certified
unit or not.

Thanks,

-dr

  #2  
Old July 18th 06, 05:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

On 17 Jul 2006 19:30:26 -0700, "Dico" wrote:

Hello,

I'm wondering if its legal to put a 2nd artificial horizon in the plane
as a backup if it is not certified? We may want to put one in the
plane as a backup... but just wanted to know if we need a certified
unit or not.

Thanks,

-dr



If you intend to use it for navigational purposes it needs to be
certified.

z
  #3  
Old July 18th 06, 05:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?


Cite to chapter and verse of the FAR, please?

Jim



"zatatime" wrote in message
news
On 17 Jul 2006 19:30:26 -0700, "Dico" wrote:


I'm wondering if its legal to put a 2nd artificial horizon in the plane
as a backup if it is not certified? We may want to put one in the
plane as a backup... but just wanted to know if we need a certified
unit or not.



If you intend to use it for navigational purposes it needs to be
certified.

z



  #4  
Old July 19th 06, 12:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Steve Foley[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

Hmmm...

I find references to Parts and Sections, but nothing for verse.....

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

Cite to chapter and verse of the FAR, please?

Jim



  #5  
Old July 20th 06, 04:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:53:03 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote:

Hmmm...

I find references to Parts and Sections, but nothing for verse.....

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

Cite to chapter and verse of the FAR, please?

Jim




I'd like to learn if I am incorrect. Can you show me where it says it
is acceptable to use a non-TSO'd part in a certified
(non-experimental) aircraft without changing its classification?

z
  #6  
Old July 20th 06, 04:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?


"zatatime" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:53:03 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote:

Hmmm...

I find references to Parts and Sections, but nothing for verse.....

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

Cite to chapter and verse of the FAR, please?

Jim




I'd like to learn if I am incorrect. Can you show me where it says it
is acceptable to use a non-TSO'd part in a certified
(non-experimental) aircraft without changing its classification?

z


You want someone to prove a negative. Better approach is to find where it
is required. If you can't find it you are home free.


  #7  
Old July 20th 06, 11:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Juan Jimenez[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 505
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?


"zatatime" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:53:03 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote:

Hmmm...

I find references to Parts and Sections, but nothing for verse.....

"RST Engineering" wrote in message
...

Cite to chapter and verse of the FAR, please?

Jim


I'd like to learn if I am incorrect. Can you show me where it says it
is acceptable to use a non-TSO'd part in a certified
(non-experimental) aircraft without changing its classification?

z


The FAR's may not say anything but your insurance policy might have
something to say about it if you're in an accident and file a claim.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #8  
Old July 22nd 06, 09:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

In article ,
zatatime wrote:

I'd like to learn if I am incorrect. Can you show me where it says it
is acceptable to use a non-TSO'd part in a certified
(non-experimental) aircraft without changing its classification?


My cherokee has a non-TSO'd DME installed under an STC.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #9  
Old July 18th 06, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?


"zatatime" wrote in message
news
On 17 Jul 2006 19:30:26 -0700, "Dico" wrote:

Hello,

I'm wondering if its legal to put a 2nd artificial horizon in the plane
as a backup if it is not certified? We may want to put one in the
plane as a backup... but just wanted to know if we need a certified
unit or not.

Thanks,

-dr



If you intend to use it for navigational purposes it needs to be
certified.

z


Bzzzzzt, wrong.


  #10  
Old July 19th 06, 04:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default non TSO AI for co-pilot legal?

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 04:10:38 GMT, "Dave Stadt"
wrote:


"zatatime" wrote in message
news
On 17 Jul 2006 19:30:26 -0700, "Dico" wrote:

Hello,

I'm wondering if its legal to put a 2nd artificial horizon in the plane
as a backup if it is not certified? We may want to put one in the
plane as a backup... but just wanted to know if we need a certified
unit or not.

Thanks,

-dr



If you intend to use it for navigational purposes it needs to be
certified.

z


Bzzzzzt, wrong.


Fill me in....What's right then?

z
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? Andrew Gideon Piloting 6 February 3rd 04 03:01 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.