A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Skytec starters for 0-470s???



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 14th 06, 12:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Guy Byars
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???

I am considering upgrading the starter in my 182P Skylane with the new
Sky-Tec flyweight starter. It looks like it will spin the prop faster -w-
less power.

Does anyone have experience with the Sky-Tec flyweight starter in an O-470
engine?

Guy Byars



  #2  
Old August 14th 06, 12:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???

Do not get the lightweight starters without also replacing the starter
adapter with the model that works with these type starters. Call
Niagara Airparts and they will explain it all.



Guy Byars wrote:
I am considering upgrading the starter in my 182P Skylane with the new
Sky-Tec flyweight starter. It looks like it will spin the prop faster -w-
less power.

Does anyone have experience with the Sky-Tec flyweight starter in an O-470
engine?

Guy Byars



  #3  
Old August 14th 06, 10:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Guy Byars
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???

I'm not sure I understand, the flyweight starter from Sky-Tec is a bolt on
replacement for the original. What adapter are you talking about?


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..
Do not get the lightweight starters without also replacing the starter
adapter with the model that works with these type starters. Call
Niagara Airparts and they will explain it all.



Guy Byars wrote:
I am considering upgrading the starter in my 182P Skylane with the new
Sky-Tec flyweight starter. It looks like it will spin the prop

faster -w-
less power.

Does anyone have experience with the Sky-Tec flyweight starter in an

O-470
engine?

Guy Byars





  #4  
Old August 14th 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???

The starter bolts to the starter adapter. When you turn the key the
starter spins the adapter which in turn spins the engine. The new
starter operates a little differently from the original. The difference
is in how it engages and disengages. Lightweight starter and standard
starter adapter do not work for very long. You're right they bolt right
up but they don't play well for long.

Guy Byars wrote:
I'm not sure I understand, the flyweight starter from Sky-Tec is a bolt on
replacement for the original. What adapter are you talking about?


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..

Do not get the lightweight starters without also replacing the starter
adapter with the model that works with these type starters. Call
Niagara Airparts and they will explain it all.



Guy Byars wrote:

I am considering upgrading the starter in my 182P Skylane with the new
Sky-Tec flyweight starter. It looks like it will spin the prop


faster -w-

less power.

Does anyone have experience with the Sky-Tec flyweight starter in an


O-470

engine?

Guy Byars






  #5  
Old August 14th 06, 03:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???


Newps wrote:
The starter bolts to the starter adapter. When you turn the key the
starter spins the adapter which in turn spins the engine. The new
starter operates a little differently from the original. The difference
is in how it engages and disengages. Lightweight starter and standard
starter adapter do not work for very long. You're right they bolt right
up but they don't play well for long.

Guy Byars wrote:
I'm not sure I understand, the flyweight starter from Sky-Tec is a bolt on
replacement for the original. What adapter are you talking about?


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..

Do not get the lightweight starters without also replacing the starter
adapter with the model that works with these type starters. Call
Niagara Airparts and they will explain it all.


On the O-470 the starter is always engaged, and a coil
spring clutch acts as a one-way drive . What would the new drive
adapter have that's different?
We put a Lamar starter on an O-470, and it was so gutless
that we ended up buying another old Prestolite to replace it. Those
permanent magnets are only so powerful. I think the Skytecs or
Magnaflites might be better; we use Magnaflites on three 172s and they
work OK.

Dan

  #6  
Old August 14th 06, 06:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Allen[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???


wrote in message
ups.com...
On the O-470 the starter is always engaged, and a coil
spring clutch acts as a one-way drive . What would the new drive
adapter have that's different?
We put a Lamar starter on an O-470, and it was so gutless
that we ended up buying another old Prestolite to replace it. Those
permanent magnets are only so powerful. I think the Skytecs or
Magnaflites might be better; we use Magnaflites on three 172s and they
work OK.

Dan


The starter adapter is always engaged; the starter only turns when
energized, which in turn causes the coil spring clutch to clamp onto the
starter adapter shaft and turn the engine. I think the problem comes from
the lightweight starter (planetary drive gear) not stopping quickly after
being de-energized which causes the spring to stay clamped and causes wear.

Allen


  #7  
Old August 14th 06, 06:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
DL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Skytec starters for 0-470s???

There are two types of Continental starter adapters for O-470 engines. 1)
What Niagra calls the "classic" version, needs a starter that is able to
turn freely when not energized, since the adapter must "unwind" a bit after
the engine starts. Such a starter adapter has been reported to have
problems with the older Sky-Tec starter for Cont. O-470's, C12ST1. The
newer Sky-Tec starter for Continentals, C12ST3 is supposed to solve this
problem, as this starter's output shaft can be turned by hand, in either
direction, when not energized. 2) The newer Continental starter adapter is
described in Cont. Service Bulletin M92-10. It "may" have been happy with
the older Sky-Tec starter (I don't know) and I don't know if Sky-Tec still
sells the ST1, since it now has the ST3. Continental's Service Information
Letter SIL02-4 describes a newer starter that sounds like it works like the
Sky-Tec ST1. I wouldn't want to use such a starter with the "classic"
starter adapter - a lot of which adapters are still in service.

How does one know which kind of starter adapter they have? The SB M92-10
says the newer adapter may exhibit varying degrees of resistance to
propellor rotation in the direction opposite to normal engine cranking
rotation. I don't think the "classic" adapter exhibits such resistance.

wrote in message
ups.com...

Newps wrote:
The starter bolts to the starter adapter. When you turn the key the
starter spins the adapter which in turn spins the engine. The new
starter operates a little differently from the original. The difference
is in how it engages and disengages. Lightweight starter and standard
starter adapter do not work for very long. You're right they bolt right
up but they don't play well for long.

Guy Byars wrote:
I'm not sure I understand, the flyweight starter from Sky-Tec is a bolt
on
replacement for the original. What adapter are you talking about?


"Newps" wrote in message
. ..

Do not get the lightweight starters without also replacing the starter
adapter with the model that works with these type starters. Call
Niagara Airparts and they will explain it all.


On the O-470 the starter is always engaged, and a coil
spring clutch acts as a one-way drive . What would the new drive
adapter have that's different?
We put a Lamar starter on an O-470, and it was so gutless
that we ended up buying another old Prestolite to replace it. Those
permanent magnets are only so powerful. I think the Skytecs or
Magnaflites might be better; we use Magnaflites on three 172s and they
work OK.

Dan



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Skytec starter woes [email protected] Owning 4 December 1st 05 08:24 PM
Recoil starters on small 2-stroke engines [email protected] Home Built 17 February 26th 05 01:35 PM
SkyTec Starter sticking? [email protected] Owning 10 November 10th 04 10:00 PM
Engine starters in the J41 Matthias Lieberecht General Aviation 0 July 16th 03 09:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.