![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am getting a Garmin 480 installed.
In the disclaimer it states all GPS are for VFR approval only. Will be IFR when 337 is approved. Any comments? Hank 172 driver |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's there to comment? It has to be in an IFR-approved installation
to be used for IFR. Hankal wrote: I am getting a Garmin 480 installed. In the disclaimer it states all GPS are for VFR approval only. Will be IFR when 337 is approved. Any comments? Hank 172 driver |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's there to comment? It has to be in an IFR-approved installation
to be used for IFR. It is an IFR installation. Is a 337 required? I am not an Avionics mechanic, so don't beat up on me. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hankal wrote:
What's there to comment? It has to be in an IFR-approved installation to be used for IFR. It is an IFR installation. Is a 337 required? I think so. I am not an Avionics mechanic, so don't beat up on me. I'm not either, but I did have an IFR GPS installed once a few years ago. There was a Supplemental POH that needed to be filed with my airplane's POH. That supplement has to be approved by OK City. I think the 337 is the mechanism for getting the approval. The SPOH spells out the limitations on using the GPS for IFR, so it can't be used IFR until that supplement is in effect. It will say things like the requirement for having a current database in order to use it for instrument approaches, for example. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hankal wrote: What's there to comment? It has to be in an IFR-approved installation to be used for IFR. It is an IFR installation. Is a 337 required? I am not an Avionics mechanic, so don't beat up on me. But, you should be talking with one. Without an experienced Avionics technician making the installation, it likely won't become an IFR installation. The paperwork is a moving target, but is a lot easier today than a few years ago. Whether it involves a 377 is academic becuase, if it does, the competent shop will take care of that in course. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But, you should be talking with one. Without an experienced Avionics
technician making the installation, it likely won't become an IFR installation. The paperwork is a moving target, but is a lot easier today than a few years ago. Whether it involves a 377 is academic becuase, if it does, the competent shop will take care of that in course. I have a certified Avionics shop do the install |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hankal wrote:
I am getting a Garmin 480 installed. In the disclaimer it states all GPS are for VFR approval only. Will be IFR when 337 is approved. Any comments? I remember that there was some paperwork before a GNS-430 we installed into a 172 became legal for IFR, but I don't recall it being a 337. I think some sort of test was involved. From what I understand, this requirement is typical. - Andrew |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congratulations, Hank. I think you made a good choice.
Years ago, when I installed an IFR Loran, there was some delay in getting the installation and the POH supplement approved. There was no such delay for my CNX80. The 337 plus a simple flight test to prove conformance did the trick. I can't recommend actually taking your new GNS480 into IMC until you've become pretty familiar with it, though. Spend some time with the Windows simulator to get comfortable using the menu structure. You'll need to learn where everything lives. ---JRC--- "Hankal" wrote in message = ... I am getting a Garmin 480 installed. In the disclaimer it states all GPS are for VFR approval only. Will be IFR when 337 is approved. Any comments? Hank 172 driver |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't recommend actually taking your new GNS480 into IMC
until you've become pretty familiar with it, though. Spend some time with the Windows simulator to get comfortable using the menu structure. You'll need to learn where everything lives. I have started to read on how to use the 480. It is a very long learning curve, but nothing that I cannot handle. Give me a few months and I will have it down pat. I never would get myself into a situation that requires IRF approaches with the 480 until I have it mastered. Still have my VOR and ILS. Hank |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Hankal" wrote in message =
... I can't recommend actually taking your new GNS480 into IMC until you've become pretty familiar with it, though. Spend some time with the Windows simulator to get comfortable using the menu structure. You'll need to learn where everything = lives. =20 I have started to read on how to use the 480. It is a very long = learning curve, but nothing that I cannot handle. Give me a few months and I will have = it down pat. I never would get myself into a situation that requires IRF approaches = with the 480 until I have it mastered. Still have my VOR and ILS. Hank Attaboy! Yes, the learning curve is long, but it's a fun one. ---JRC--- |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin Specials ADV | Michael Coates | Home Built | 0 | March 18th 04 12:24 AM |
Garmin fixes moving waypoint problem -- almost | Jon Woellhaf | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | November 28th 03 05:29 PM |
Garmin DME arc weidnress | Dave Touretzky | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 02:04 AM |
"Stand Alone" Boxes (Garmin 430) - Sole means of navigation - legal? | Richard | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | September 30th 03 02:13 PM |
Garmin 430/530 Questions | Steve Coleman | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 28th 03 09:04 PM |