![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those of you, who frequently fly SE airplanes without deicing
equipment, without turbo or second engine but use their IR Ticket to poke around in water loaded clouds at or near freezing level: What are your strategies to cope with the weather ? Situation1: You climb through low clouds, but pass the freezing level on top in clear sky. After flying at -20°C for a while, you start your descend into the water loaded clouds. How quickly does the plane ice up? The airplane skin is relatively small, so the exposed mass should be quickly warmed. What are your personal experiences with the type of cloud? A heavy loaded nimbostratus will have a different effect as a cirrus, for sure. How do you preplan such a flight? Situation2: While climbing through subcooled low clouds, what is the most practical strategy? Climb further to reach real cold layers, which are almost dry? Quickly descend to reach warmer layers? It depends? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sep,,
Situation1: You climb through low clouds, but pass the freezing level on top in clear sky. After flying at -20°C for a while, you start your descend into the water loaded clouds. If you fly a plane that will bring you to an altitude with -20 C after flying through low clouds, you'll likely have de-icing equipment. Situation2: While climbing through subcooled low clouds, what is the most practical strategy? Climb further to reach real cold layers, which are almost dry? Quickly descend to reach warmer layers? It depends? Well, your first strategy really depends on whether you can climb high enough while you airplane will still climb. Often, that will not work. Turbocharging helps, of course. So yes, the freezing level absolutely needs to be above the MEA/MORA or whatever it is called where you fly. Or it needs to be in the clear below the cloud base, with enough room to the ground to fly safely. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Kusi (us-ppl, sep, d.-ir) ] Posted At: Friday, December 22, 2006 7:52 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: SE airplanes in clouds - near freezing level Subject: SE airplanes in clouds - near freezing level .... Situation1: You climb through low clouds, but pass the freezing level on top in clear sky. After flying at -20°C for a while, you start your descend into the water loaded clouds. How quickly does the plane ice up? The airplane skin is relatively small, so the exposed mass should be quickly warmed. What are your personal experiences with the type of cloud? A heavy loaded nimbostratus will have a different effect as a cirrus, for sure. How do you preplan such a flight? Having enjoyed this ride in a Commander 112 back in November '75 I can relate that after flying in -15C at 12K on top of a solid deck from Seattle to Bozeman we entered the side of an upslope cumulous there at the ridge between Bozeman and Livingstone. The aircraft RAPIDLY built enough ice to completely clog the engine air intake screen, take down the long-wire ADF antenna and generally turn our world very bad, very quickly. We switched to alternate intake but slung the ice off the prop unevenly and induced some serious vibration. The instrument student in the left seat executed a nice standard rate 180 but we lost enough altitude that we never flew back out of the side of the buildup. We came out of the bottom of the overcast in a little snow storm and were VERY lucky to break out in a valley with a paved road in the bottom. Not much damage to the aircraft except outboard of the fuel tanks where we hit the bridge railing - the pastures were wet and snow covered. We still had over 1 1/2" on the airframe after we came to a stop. Based on the size of the airframe, I figure we picked up close to 1600# of ice in less than 2 minutes. After the aircraft was repaired, when we flew it back to Seattle we had to let down again with a cold airframe through about 8000' of visible moisture, but we had about a 1000' ceiling underneath. It seemed the best way was to execute a modified ILS into BFI, so we hit the IAF outbound at around 10K and flew the teardrop. Rolled out of the procedure turn and hit the FAF almost perfect. Didn't pick up much ice on the way down so what we did accumulate was gone before we touched down. How do you preplan such a flight? If you don't have known ice equipment or don't know how to use it, and you can't get over or around the highest tops enroute then I'd plan on taking the bus or driving. But that's just my personal minimums now. If all you have to do is penetrate a small layer during an approach then depending on the probability of having to do a missed, and the aircraft capability to execute the missed with a load of ice, and how big that load of ice might be, and lots of other considerations, you might still try it. The problem with this approach is that once you start you're committed -- no pulling over to rethink the options. Personally, 30 years later, I have to admit that I like my ice in a glass and not stuck to aluminum or plexi. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Carter's experience is telling. When a cold-soaked airframe descends
into the clouds it is going to collect a lot of ice in a hurry. Where does the "quickly warmed" idea come from? Bob Gardner "Kusi (us-ppl, sep, d.-ir)" wrote in message ups.com... Those of you, who frequently fly SE airplanes without deicing equipment, without turbo or second engine but use their IR Ticket to poke around in water loaded clouds at or near freezing level: What are your strategies to cope with the weather ? Situation1: You climb through low clouds, but pass the freezing level on top in clear sky. After flying at -20°C for a while, you start your descend into the water loaded clouds. How quickly does the plane ice up? The airplane skin is relatively small, so the exposed mass should be quickly warmed. What are your personal experiences with the type of cloud? A heavy loaded nimbostratus will have a different effect as a cirrus, for sure. How do you preplan such a flight? Situation2: While climbing through subcooled low clouds, what is the most practical strategy? Climb further to reach real cold layers, which are almost dry? Quickly descend to reach warmer layers? It depends? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Gardner" wrote:
Jim Carter's experience is telling. When a cold-soaked airframe descends into the clouds it is going to collect a lot of ice in a hurry. Where does the "quickly warmed" idea come from? The thin sheet metal skin on the plane warms up fast. It's the fuel in the tanks that hold the cold. So, obviously, the answer is to make sure you don't have any fuel left when you start your descent :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Roy Smith ] Posted At: Friday, December 22, 2006 3:18 PM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: SE airplanes in clouds - near freezing level Subject: SE airplanes in clouds - near freezing level "Bob Gardner" wrote: Jim Carter's experience is telling. When a cold-soaked airframe descends into the clouds it is going to collect a lot of ice in a hurry. Where does the "quickly warmed" idea come from? The thin sheet metal skin on the plane warms up fast. It's the fuel in the tanks that hold the cold. So, obviously, the answer is to make sure you don't have any fuel left when you start your descent :-) Now there's a different approach to the problem -- can't say that I want to try it though. Very unique answer Roy. ;-} |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. Jim Carter's experience is telling. When a cold-soaked airframe descends into the clouds it is going to collect a lot of ice in a hurry. Where does the "quickly warmed" idea come from? It doesn't even have to get into the clouds. A cold soaked airplane descending into humid air can accumulate a layer of frost, thickness of which depends on time of exposure, humidity, and how cold the airplane was. This is an exception to the common theory that visible moisture is required for accumulation of airframe icing. It has happened to me in a Saratoga, I landed with still 1/4 inch or so of ice under the wings, where the inboard fuel tanks are located, and a little elsewhere. Never passed through a cloud or any kind of visible moisture, had been flying a couple of hours at 16,500 or so, saw ice accumulating during descent through warmer air. The thin skin without any thermal mass beneath it apparently warmed rapidly enough to accumulate little and shed it, whereas the fuel tanks had enough thermal mass to keep the ice frozen. The recent FAA regional counsel letter about icing conditions included areas of high humidity with near freezing temperature as known icing conditions. It has widely been hooted down, but is not entirely wrong. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTDT, in a Lear descending into Baton Rouge after a flight in the high 30
flight levels. Mucho ice on the bottoms of the wings. Bob "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. Jim Carter's experience is telling. When a cold-soaked airframe descends into the clouds it is going to collect a lot of ice in a hurry. Where does the "quickly warmed" idea come from? It doesn't even have to get into the clouds. A cold soaked airplane descending into humid air can accumulate a layer of frost, thickness of which depends on time of exposure, humidity, and how cold the airplane was. This is an exception to the common theory that visible moisture is required for accumulation of airframe icing. It has happened to me in a Saratoga, I landed with still 1/4 inch or so of ice under the wings, where the inboard fuel tanks are located, and a little elsewhere. Never passed through a cloud or any kind of visible moisture, had been flying a couple of hours at 16,500 or so, saw ice accumulating during descent through warmer air. The thin skin without any thermal mass beneath it apparently warmed rapidly enough to accumulate little and shed it, whereas the fuel tanks had enough thermal mass to keep the ice frozen. The recent FAA regional counsel letter about icing conditions included areas of high humidity with near freezing temperature as known icing conditions. It has widely been hooted down, but is not entirely wrong. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... BTDT, in a Lear descending into Baton Rouge after a flight in the high 30 flight levels. Mucho ice on the bottoms of the wings. Thanks for that little story, Bob. You are the only person I have ever heard report the same kind of occurence. I have been accused of lying, even though it seems obvious that it will occur. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stan Prevost" wrote in message ...
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... BTDT, in a Lear descending into Baton Rouge after a flight in the high 30 flight levels. Mucho ice on the bottoms of the wings. Thanks for that little story, Bob. You are the only person I have ever heard report the same kind of occurence. I have been accused of lying, even though it seems obvious that it will occur. We pilots of Cessna tip-tank twins would support you too, Stan. On ground after a high flight, the fuel level in the tip tanks is clearly evident. Usually it's only condensation, but sometimes it can be clear ice. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
C-152 Breaks Up In Air | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 23 | September 7th 06 10:00 AM |
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | November 23rd 05 10:31 PM |
Pentrating Towering Cumulus Clouds | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 49 | May 11th 05 04:45 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |