A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Alphonse Penaud's Planophore of 1871



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 03, 11:50 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alphonse Penaud's Planophore of 1871

The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob
  #2  
Old July 2nd 03, 12:10 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob


This was only one of the progenitors and scarcely the most advanced.

George Cayley laid a lot of the groundwork which was taken up by
pioneers such as Henson, Stringfellow and Lillienthal

Henson was experimenting with gliders and lightweight steam engines
in the 1840's and published his patent (no. 9478) in 1842. This described
a machine with bamboo spars and diagonal wire bracing. The surface of the
planes was to amount to 4,500 square feet, and the tail, triangular in form
was to be 1,500 square feet. The driving power was to be supplied by a
steam engine of 25 to 30 horse-power, driving two six-bladed propellers.

John Stringfellow flew his first steam powered flying machine in 1848 and
his triplane of 1868
is on display in the Early Flight Gallery of the National Air & Space
Museum,
Washington, DC

Otto Lilienthal's work is of course seminal and laid much of the foundations
of what is noiwadays referred to as aerodynamics. In particular his
analysis
of different wing constructions and aspect ratio, wing shape and profile,
based on his experiments were invaluable to those who followed.

Keith


  #3  
Old July 2nd 03, 05:45 PM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob


This was only one of the progenitors and scarcely the most advanced.

George Cayley laid a lot of the groundwork which was taken up by
pioneers such as Henson, Stringfellow and Lillienthal

Henson was experimenting with gliders and lightweight steam engines
in the 1840's and published his patent (no. 9478) in 1842. This described
a machine with bamboo spars and diagonal wire bracing. The surface of the
planes was to amount to 4,500 square feet, and the tail, triangular in form
was to be 1,500 square feet. The driving power was to be supplied by a
steam engine of 25 to 30 horse-power, driving two six-bladed propellers.

John Stringfellow flew his first steam powered flying machine in 1848 and
his triplane of 1868
is on display in the Early Flight Gallery of the National Air & Space
Museum,
Washington, DC

Otto Lilienthal's work is of course seminal and laid much of the foundations
of what is noiwadays referred to as aerodynamics. In particular his
analysis
of different wing constructions and aspect ratio, wing shape and profile,
based on his experiments were invaluable to those who followed.

Keith


The Planophore (1871) flew farther and longer than the Wright Flyer
and was more stable. Langley, Chanute, and the Wrights all
acknowledged Penaud's accomplishments.
Got something else to say? (Of course he does... he ALWAYS does)

Rob
  #4  
Old July 2nd 03, 05:51 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...

The Planophore (1871) flew farther and longer than the Wright Flyer
and was more stable.


So what?


  #5  
Old July 2nd 03, 09:47 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob


This was only one of the progenitors and scarcely the most advanced.

George Cayley laid a lot of the groundwork which was taken up by
pioneers such as Henson, Stringfellow and Lillienthal

Henson was experimenting with gliders and lightweight steam engines
in the 1840's and published his patent (no. 9478) in 1842. This

described
a machine with bamboo spars and diagonal wire bracing. The surface of

the
planes was to amount to 4,500 square feet, and the tail, triangular in

form
was to be 1,500 square feet. The driving power was to be supplied by a
steam engine of 25 to 30 horse-power, driving two six-bladed propellers.

John Stringfellow flew his first steam powered flying machine in 1848

and
his triplane of 1868
is on display in the Early Flight Gallery of the National Air & Space
Museum,
Washington, DC

Otto Lilienthal's work is of course seminal and laid much of the

foundations
of what is noiwadays referred to as aerodynamics. In particular his
analysis
of different wing constructions and aspect ratio, wing shape and

profile,
based on his experiments were invaluable to those who followed.

Keith


The Planophore (1871) flew farther and longer than the Wright Flyer
and was more stable. Langley, Chanute, and the Wrights all
acknowledged Penaud's accomplishments.


Sure it did but it was a model powered by a rubber band.
A machine capable of carrying a man is a rather more advanced
device and while it may have flown longer than the Wrights first flight the
they assuredly beat its record fairly quickly.

Nobody is denying Penaud certainly did good work but he was one on many.

Got something else to say? (Of course he does... he ALWAYS does)


This is a discussion group old boy, of course other people have
something to say.

Keith


  #6  
Old July 5th 03, 04:22 PM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob

This was only one of the progenitors and scarcely the most advanced.

George Cayley laid a lot of the groundwork which was taken up by
pioneers such as Henson, Stringfellow and Lillienthal

Henson was experimenting with gliders and lightweight steam engines
in the 1840's and published his patent (no. 9478) in 1842. This

described
a machine with bamboo spars and diagonal wire bracing. The surface of

the
planes was to amount to 4,500 square feet, and the tail, triangular in

form
was to be 1,500 square feet. The driving power was to be supplied by a
steam engine of 25 to 30 horse-power, driving two six-bladed propellers.

John Stringfellow flew his first steam powered flying machine in 1848

and
his triplane of 1868
is on display in the Early Flight Gallery of the National Air & Space
Museum,
Washington, DC

Otto Lilienthal's work is of course seminal and laid much of the

foundations
of what is noiwadays referred to as aerodynamics. In particular his
analysis
of different wing constructions and aspect ratio, wing shape and

profile,
based on his experiments were invaluable to those who followed.

Keith


The Planophore (1871) flew farther and longer than the Wright Flyer
and was more stable. Langley, Chanute, and the Wrights all
acknowledged Penaud's accomplishments.


Sure it did but it was a model powered by a rubber band.
A machine capable of carrying a man is a rather more advanced
device and while it may have flown longer than the Wrights first flight the
they assuredly beat its record fairly quickly.

Nobody is denying Penaud certainly did good work but he was one on many.

Got something else to say? (Of course he does... he ALWAYS does)


This is a discussion group old boy, of course other people have
something to say.

Keith


Say something to this:

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...800s/PH4G9.htm

Rob
  #7  
Old July 5th 03, 06:27 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

news:bdvgdg$nhh$1

Say something to this:

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...800s/PH4G9.htm

Rob


It was a very nice toy but scarcely to be compared with a powered machine
that could carry passengers.

Keith


  #8  
Old July 7th 03, 01:40 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...

Say something to this:

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...800s/PH4G9.htm


It's a toy.


  #10  
Old July 4th 03, 07:02 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2 Jul 2003 09:45:20 -0700, (robert arndt) wrote:

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
The model aircraft that led to the aeroplane:

http://www.amars.hpg.ig.com.br/plantas/planoph.html

Rob


This was only one of the progenitors and scarcely the most advanced.

George Cayley laid a lot of the groundwork which was taken up by
pioneers such as Henson, Stringfellow and Lillienthal

Henson was experimenting with gliders and lightweight steam engines
in the 1840's and published his patent (no. 9478) in 1842. This described
a machine with bamboo spars and diagonal wire bracing. The surface of the
planes was to amount to 4,500 square feet, and the tail, triangular in form
was to be 1,500 square feet. The driving power was to be supplied by a
steam engine of 25 to 30 horse-power, driving two six-bladed propellers.

John Stringfellow flew his first steam powered flying machine in 1848 and
his triplane of 1868
is on display in the Early Flight Gallery of the National Air & Space
Museum,
Washington, DC

Otto Lilienthal's work is of course seminal and laid much of the foundations
of what is noiwadays referred to as aerodynamics. In particular his
analysis
of different wing constructions and aspect ratio, wing shape and profile,
based on his experiments were invaluable to those who followed.

Keith


The Planophore (1871) flew farther and longer than the Wright Flyer
and was more stable. Langley, Chanute, and the Wrights all
acknowledged Penaud's accomplishments.
Got something else to say? (Of course he does... he ALWAYS does)

Rob


You simply cannot get over the fact that the first powered, heavier
than air piloted aircraft was built an flown by Americans and not your
Germanic super men, can you?

Al Minyard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.