![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been following the thread on the U-234 and was most intetested in
the statement that there was a Me262 on board. Can anyone provide any substantial evidence of this, other than the statement that there was one on board? And if there was one on board what happened to it? I would assume that if there was one aboard that it remained in Navy hands. There doesn't appear to be any Navy records of it. Walt -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vzlion" wrote in message ... I've been following the thread on the U-234 and was most intetested in the statement that there was a Me262 on board. Can anyone provide any substantial evidence of this, other than the statement that there was one on board? And if there was one on board what happened to it? I would assume that if there was one aboard that it remained in Navy hands. There doesn't appear to be any Navy records of it. Walt There was no complete Me-262, there were components for one. The cargo was carried in multiple containers fitted in place of the mines the type normally carried. Given that the sllies captured hundreds of intact Me-262's many in flyable condition I doubt much was done with these bits. Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"vzlion" wrote in message ... I've been following the thread on the U-234 and was most intetested in the statement that there was a Me262 on board. Can anyone provide any substantial evidence of this, other than the statement that there was one on board? And if there was one on board what happened to it? I would assume that if there was one aboard that it remained in Navy hands. There doesn't appear to be any Navy records of it. Walt There was no complete Me-262, there were components for one. The cargo was carried in multiple containers fitted in place of the mines the type normally carried. Given that the sllies captured hundreds of intact Me-262's many in flyable condition I doubt much was done with these bits. Keith To be more exact there were 240 tons of German documents and war materials aboard U-234. The war material included 560 kg of Uranium Oxide, jet & rocket components for missiles and aircraft, the latest proximity fuses and AP shells, a complete pressurized pilot's chamber, and various other stocks of strategic materials along with components to various guidance systems. The boat also carried several Messerschmitt engineers with documents on the latest jet aircraft... but no complete aircraft, just components in storage containers. Rob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "vzlion" wrote in message ... I've been following the thread on the U-234 and was most intetested in the statement that there was a Me262 on board. Can anyone provide any substantial evidence of this, other than the statement that there was one on board? And if there was one on board what happened to it? I would assume that if there was one aboard that it remained in Navy hands. There doesn't appear to be any Navy records of it. Walt There was no complete Me-262, there were components for one. The cargo was carried in multiple containers fitted in place of the mines the type normally carried. Given that the sllies captured hundreds of intact Me-262's many in flyable condition I doubt much was done with these bits. Keith To be more exact there were 240 tons of German documents and war materials aboard U-234. The war material included 560 kg of Uranium Oxide, jet & rocket components for missiles and aircraft, the latest proximity fuses and AP shells, a complete pressurized pilot's chamber, and various other stocks of strategic materials along with components to various guidance systems. To my knowledge the Germans never developed a true proximity fise as they lacked the cavity magnetron and miniaturized electronics necessary.IRC correctly the best they could manage was the "Kranich" acoustic proximity fuze. The boat also carried several Messerschmitt engineers with documents For several read two, August Bringewalde, Willi Messerschmitt's "right-hand man" who was in charge of ME 262 production, and Franz Ruf, an industrial machinery specialist who designed machines and appliances to manufacture aircraft components. on the latest jet aircraft... but no complete aircraft, just components in storage containers. correct Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "vzlion" wrote in message ... SNIP To my knowledge the Germans never developed a true proximity fise as they lacked the cavity magnetron and miniaturized electronics necessary.IRC correctly the best they could manage was the "Kranich" acoustic proximity fuze. By the time the shipment had been readied, the German had in their possession possibly several dozen "dud" Allied proximity fuses, recovered from the battlefield. Gen Eisenhower had authorized the use of these devices over land at the onset of the Ardennes Offensive. German authorities offered soldiers a bounty for the recovery of partial or complete "duds". Their analysis revealed the super-tough tubes employed therein. However, no Allied proximity fuse developed duringWWII used the resonant cavity magnetron. Research and development on the miniaturization of such devices had not begun by the end of the conflict in Europe. Instead, a radio signal on a lower frequency was used. As best I've been able to learn, the characteristics of the cavitron were better and more fully understood only long after the war, when it was realized that these devices could be fabricated from a far lesser amount of material (and from materials less dear than copper) than formerly had been used. A form of "smart" artillery shells was built, (at least in the US, during the 1970's) using a rather tiny, shrunken cavitron in conjunction with some form of "guidance fins" on the shell body. The cavitron allowed friendly artillery to loft shells to the area of an enemy advance; other circuitry connected to the return radio-wave receiver could discern between a target of great mass (i.e., armor) and a target of lesser mass (i.e., a lorry) and to "select" the more massive (and presumably more valuable) target, for which the "fins" served for terminal steering. Individual shells could either achieve a direct hit on the selected target, or detonate overhead of it within sufficient proximity to disable a tank or self-propelled artillery, for example. SNIP |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() To be more exact there were 240 tons of German documents and war materials aboard U-234. The war material included 560 kg of Uranium Oxide, jet & rocket components for missiles and aircraft, the latest proximity fuses and AP shells, a complete pressurized pilot's chamber, and various other stocks of strategic materials along with components to various guidance systems. To my knowledge the Germans never developed a true proximity fise as they lacked the cavity magnetron and miniaturized electronics necessary.IRC correctly the best they could manage was the "Kranich" acoustic proximity fuze. Try all these: Bad: Acoustic, Graf Zeppelin Institute Elku/Paplitz: Electro-Acoustic, ELAK, Kiel Fuchs: Radio, AEG, Berlin Isegrimm: Electrmagnetic, Ernst Orlich Institute, Danzig Kakadu: Radio, Donaulandische GmbH, Vienna (3000 produced for Hs 293) Kranich: Acoustic, Ruhrstahl AG, Brackwede Kugelblitz: Radio, Patebt Verwertungs Gesellschaft, Salzburg Kuhglocke: Electrostatic, Rheinmetall-Borsig Lotte: IR Marabu: Radio, Siemens-Halske Marder: Radio, Ernst Orlich Institute, Danzig Meise: Acoustic, Neumann & Borm, Berlin Pinscher: Radio, Ernst Orlich Institute, Danzig Pistole: Photo-Electric Roulette: IR, Brinckmann, Gera Stimmgabel: Acoustic, Graf Zeppelin Institute Trichter: Radio, Blaupunkt Wassermaus: Photo-Electric Wiesel: Radio, Ernst Orlich Institute, Danzig Zunder-19: Aerial bomb prox. fuse for burst height of 25-30 ft above ground, Rheinmetall-Borsig At least some of these were on U-234... The boat also carried several Messerschmitt engineers with documents For several read two, August Bringewalde, Willi Messerschmitt's "right-hand man" who was in charge of ME 262 production, and Franz Ruf, an industrial machinery specialist who designed machines and appliances to manufacture aircraft components. What about Dr. Schauerns and Dr. von Chiligensberg also? on the latest jet aircraft... but no complete aircraft, just components in storage containers. correct Keith Rob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Upon further reading on U-234 I discovered that the proximity fuses
onboard were of the IR type. Rob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" writes:
To my knowledge the Germans never developed a true proximity fise as they lacked the cavity magnetron and miniaturized electronics necessary.IRC correctly the best they could manage was the "Kranich" acoustic proximity fuze. Err.. my memory is the two were quite separate. ISTM the proximity fuses were in the 150 mhz range, NOT microwave at all. -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Lesher" wrote in message ... "Keith Willshaw" writes: To my knowledge the Germans never developed a true proximity fise as they lacked the cavity magnetron and miniaturized electronics necessary.IRC correctly the best they could manage was the "Kranich" acoustic proximity fuze. Err.. my memory is the two were quite separate. ISTM the proximity fuses were in the 150 mhz range, NOT microwave at all. Yes I've already been corrected in that regard, thanks anyway. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|