![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello
![]() I'm about to start refinishing a Discus.Searching through this and other forums I've noticed people are leaning towards polyurethane and away from gelcoat.Gelcoat seems to be much easier in my situation, since I don't have a spray booth and they don't recommend sanding poly after you've painted.I asked about PPG Concept locally and the dealer says that acrylic urethanes shouldn't be sanded.Their top of the line poly is called Deltron- but he couldn't say why it is better than Concept.There's also DuPont with it's products- and they are 3-4 times cheaper than PPG.I wonder if they really differ in quality that much.Please advice. Before the paint I'll have to fix one of the canopy hinges- the rear one - it's delaminated and moves quite a bit.Pictures of the crack are here http://picasaweb.google.com/barowicz/Canopy. How to fix such a small detail? It seems that it takes a lot of stress and that's why it's cracked. Thanks, LB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Hello ![]() I'm about to start refinishing a Discus.Searching through this and other forums I've noticed people are leaning towards polyurethane and away from gelcoat.Gelcoat seems to be much easier in my situation, since I don't have a spray booth and they don't recommend sanding poly after you've painted.I asked about PPG Concept locally and the dealer says that acrylic urethanes shouldn't be sanded.Their top of the line poly is called Deltron- but he couldn't say why it is better than Concept.There's also DuPont with it's products- and they are 3-4 times cheaper than PPG.I wonder if they really differ in quality that much.Please advice. Before the paint I'll have to fix one of the canopy hinges- the rear one - it's delaminated and moves quite a bit.Pictures of the crack are here http://picasaweb.google.com/barowicz/Canopy. How to fix such a small detail? It seems that it takes a lot of stress and that's why it's cracked. Thanks, LB I'm looking at the same thing you are. I've been studying the options for a couple of years. I've decided that gelcoat is the better option for me. Take a look at Jim Phoenix's site where he refinishes a Nimbus 3. http://www.jimphoenix.com/ Polyurethanes are wonderful materials that are very durable and last a very long time. In this regard, they are better than gelcoat. However, everything depends on surface preparation and priming. You'd better get the prep right 'cause it's hard to fix problems after you shoot the final coat. To spray polyurethane, you really need a profesional spray booth with professional skills and tools. It can be repaired but it's best not to. OTOH, gelcoat is a more forgiving process - easily sprayed and highly sandable. The refinish process is relatively simple. Just grind off the old white stuff, fix dings, fill and contour the surface, spray gelcoat and sand/polish to the desired finish. Note that minor 'orange peel' and/or runs in a freshly sprayed gelcoat surface aren't a big deal since you plan to sand off most of the coat anyway. If you really screw up a spot, just repeat the process for that area. Try some small projects like gear doors first so you climb the learning curve on out-of-sight parts. To do it right you need a clean shop with reasonably controlled temperature. Keep in mind that a refinish can be considered a 'major repair' which requires proper paperwork and AI sign offs. It's especially important to keep control surface weight and balance within the limits specified in the maintenance manual. A owner/pilot is allowed to do anything to his aircraft that an AI is willing to sign off. Find a friendly AI before you start. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill, LB,
If I had to do it all over again, I'd use polyurethane. Gelcoat is such a long process that I only got one wing, tail and part of the fuselage done, but really it's the weight of the gelcoat that's so discouraging. Poly-u is much lighter. Gary Kemp did his N3 in poly-u. Definitely the way to go with all the usual cautions about spraying, etc. Keep in mind gelcoat has it's own health problems with the catalyst MEKP able to cause instant blindness. It's also expensive and takes a while to get all the clever tricks learned. Stripping and varnishing an old wooden boat seems so much easier ;-) Jim On Jan 6, 7:56 am, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I'm looking at the same thing you are. I've been studying the options for a couple of years. I've decided that gelcoat is the better option for me. Take a look at Jim Phoenix's site where he refinishes a Nimbus 3.http://www.jimphoenix.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 6, 9:13 am, wrote:
Bill, LB, If I had to do it all over again, I'd use polyurethane. Gelcoat is such a long process that I only got one wing, tail and part of the fuselage done, but really it's the weight of the gelcoat that's so discouraging. Poly-u is much lighter. Gary Kemp did his N3 in poly-u. Definitely the way to go with all the usual cautions about spraying, etc. Keep in mind gelcoat has it's own health problems with the catalyst MEKP able to cause instant blindness. It's also expensive and takes a while to get all the clever tricks learned. Stripping and varnishing an old wooden boat seems so much easier ;-) Jim On Jan 6, 7:56 am, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: I'm looking at the same thing you are. I've been studying the options for a couple of years. I've decided that gelcoat is the better option for me. Take a look at Jim Phoenix's site where he refinishes a Nimbus 3.http://www.jimphoenix.com/ I would second Jim's recommendation. I did the outer panels of my Nimbus 2 a few years ago and I did it in PU. It is not that bad a process. The nice thing is most body shops are set up to handle PU paints. Do all the prep work yourself and then hire a local shop to shoot the last coat of primer and paint. The work in PU is upfront, it needs to be finished to final smoothness and shape before the painting. The nice thing is once done you will likely never do it again if you take care of the glider. Search for sites that talk about finishing homebuilt aircraft like Long-ez's, etc. Find a good AI to work with from the start. Make sure you can do the mass balance checks on control surfaces. I would recommended doing a before and after as a check rather than just the after mass balance weights. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having done several of both, I do not see a clear answer for a
refinish. One issue I do see clearly: The root cause of essentially all the finish problems observed in gelcoated gliders lies in the criminally substandard "modern" materials used by most of the manufacturers. There is abolutely NO reason the gelcoat finish on gliders should fail. Gelcoated sailboats are subject to high humidity, salt water, huge structural loads, and a lack of care by their owners yet do not display the problems we see in our aircraft. Libelles that are 30 years old still have nearly perfect finishes. I have a gelcoated camper shell on my pickup that has been essentially ignored and outside for 17 years old and shows no sign of crazing or failure. I know of several Grob products that have been out in the western USA for 20+ years with little or no finish care and they have not crazed. If $100K gliders were Dodge pickups, there would be a class-action suit filed against the manufacturers for shoddy materials. Rant Off. Back On Topic. "Gelcoat" Refinish (catalyzed polyester paint): Poly-Lux, Prestec, Simtec, Vorgelat, Schwabellac (sp), Ferro, and many others Pro's: Less skill and facilities required to apply and end up with a good finish. Far less hazardous to work with. Easier to fix nicks and dings. Can be profiled/contoured years after application. Typically this can be done at least once and usually twice before significant sand-through of the finish occurs. Less expensive than PU Con's: All things being equal it is not as durable as 2-pack PU, especially if the ship is subject to environmental abuse (tied out full-time) Requires more waxing/polishing. Subject to stress cracks when applied thickly to floppy wings but this can be mitigated. Can yellow with time. 2-Part Paint: PPG, Dupont, Glasurit, Imron, many others Pro's: Very durable, shiny finish that can withstand the elements. Does not yellow. Con's: Very hazardous to apply (especially isocyanate catalyzed types), Requires very good equipment, good facilities, and superior skill to apply well. Very expensive paint systems (as much as $400 per gallon). More expensive and time-consuming to repair nicks and dings, Cannot be profile/contour sanded after application without repainting due to thin topcoat film thickness. Someone mentioned that PU refinishes weight significantly less. That has not been my experience. The PU topcoat is very thin but the amount of primer-surfacer required to contour the surface and fill all the pinholes in the fiberglass seem to negate any weight savings over gelcoat. This is especially true when individuals have piled on the primer and not sanded enough off and/or not removed all of the previous finish. Moisure (vapor) migration in and though epoxy composites can lift PU topcoats due to their impermeability. Polyester coatings are porous and allow migration. For racing-class ships that will be taken care of, my vote is "gelcoat". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 6, 3:24*pm, " wrote:
Having done several of both, I do not see a clear answer for a refinish. One issue I do see clearly: The root cause of essentially all the finish problems observed in gelcoated gliders lies in the criminally substandard "modern" materials used by most of the manufacturers. *There is abolutely NO reason the gelcoat finish on gliders should fail. *Gelcoated sailboats are subject to high humidity, salt water, huge structural loads, and a lack of care by their owners yet do not display the problems we see in our aircraft. Libelles that are 30 years old still have nearly perfect finishes. I have a gelcoated camper shell on my pickup that has been essentially ignored and outside for 17 years old and shows no sign of crazing or failure. *I know of several Grob products that have been out in the western USA for 20+ years with little or no finish care and they have not crazed. If $100K gliders were Dodge pickups, there would be a class-action suit filed against the manufacturers for shoddy materials. Rant Off. *Back On Topic. "Gelcoat" Refinish (catalyzed polyester paint): *Poly-Lux, Prestec, Simtec, Vorgelat, Schwabellac (sp), Ferro, and many others Pro's: Less skill and facilities required to apply and end up with a good finish. *Far less hazardous to work with. *Easier to fix nicks and dings. *Can be profiled/contoured years after application. Typically this can be done at least once and usually twice before significant sand-through of the finish occurs. Less expensive than PU Con's: *All things being equal it is not as durable as 2-pack PU, especially if the ship is subject to environmental abuse (tied out full-time) *Requires more waxing/polishing. Subject to stress cracks when applied thickly to floppy wings but this can be mitigated. Can yellow with time. 2-Part Paint: *PPG, Dupont, Glasurit, Imron, many others Pro's: *Very durable, shiny finish that can withstand the elements. Does not yellow. Con's: *Very hazardous to apply (especially isocyanate catalyzed types), Requires very good equipment, good facilities, and superior skill to apply well. *Very expensive paint systems (as much as $400 per gallon). *More expensive and time-consuming to repair nicks and dings, *Cannot be profile/contour sanded after application without repainting due to thin topcoat film thickness. Someone mentioned that PU refinishes weight significantly less. *That has not been my experience. *The PU topcoat is very thin but the amount of primer-surfacer required to contour the surface and fill all the pinholes in the fiberglass seem to negate any weight savings over gelcoat. This is especially true when individuals have piled on the primer and not sanded enough off and/or not removed all of the previous finish. Moisure (vapor) migration in and though epoxy composites can lift PU topcoats due to their impermeability. *Polyester coatings are porous and allow migration. For racing-class ships that will be taken care of, my vote is "gelcoat". Hey Mark, Very thoughtful post. Quick question for you. Assuming you used Simtec (Prestec) gelcoat, do you remember which of their formulations you used? We (meaning glider pilots who are stupid enough to fiddle with this stuff) seem to use the 2381 formulation, but their literature suggests they have a formulation with additives designed to make the finished product more flexible. Just curious whether anyone has experimented with the various flavors of the polyester-based products. Thanks, P3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming this is a Schempp-Hirth, you can buy new hinges. They are
screwed/bonded in and can be replaced. I have fixed several of these in situ as well with glass and epoxy-based adhesives. That hinge design is a major weakness that is possibly intentional so the canopy will break away if you get the jettison sequence wrong. At least one pilot has been beaten about the head and shoulders by a S-H canopy that did not go away when he wanted it to. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Good point, Mike........one can sand and polish PU and AU as long as enough paint is applied. The auto painters spray on one medium coat and one flow coat and never want to touch it again. Glider shops spray on four flow coats and sand off some of the last coat with 600W and 800W (even finer if your a fanatic) then buff it out with liquid rubbing compound. The PIK came with sanded PU and the Genesis came with sanded AU. One doesn't need to worry about over-spray or keeping a the wet-edge, if your going to sand it later. I often spray one side of a wing, let it dry, turn it over and spray the other side after touching the blend area with 220D. I also have found a good PE 'white' primer that goes on smooth and doesn't ball up like that damned Simtec 2081. JJ When I repainted my ship in PU, I found a product at the paint store from 3M called 'Guide Coat'. It is a black powder that comes with a foam pad applicator. You smear this on the painted surface, wet it down with water and go at it with 600 - 800 sand paper on a sanding pad. The Guide Coat shows the valleys between the orange peel. When it is gone, the surface is smooth. This stuff works so well and is so easy to apply that I can highly recommend it to anyone who is trying to finish sand their ship. I went back and reapplied the guide coat between the 600 and 800 and it showed the scratches, so it was also a good indicator of when to stop with the 800 grit. I was told to put extra paint on all the edges, which I did. I still sanded through in spots. You really have to hit any sharp contour with a LOT of paint, as it is so easy to sand through. Then treat those edges like a virgin when you sand. I'm very pleased with the finished product, and would not hesitate to do it again. Brian Bange |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a phenomenal amount of "reiniventing the wheel" by the glider
community in regards to this subject, and especially in regards to painting with PU or AU. There is a tremendous amount of information on a web site called Autobodystore.com. They sell excellent instructional videos in addition to hosting a great Forum. As you can see on the forum, all of these paint systems are sanded on a regular basis by auto refinishers. As JJ pointed out, keeping a wet edge and overspray are No Big Deal if you plan on scuffing up the paint edge and knocking the oversray prior to painting the rest. Alas, not everyone is aware of this - inlcuding the high quality body shop who shot the K21 wing I spoke of. Refinishing a kilo-dollar glider by yourself using techniques and materials you evolved from trial and error is not where I would get my first experience in this type of work. Additionally, buying a refinished glider is a bit of a leap of faith if the finish is less than 5-ish years old. It is difficult to know how well all of the prep and reacoating was done in less time. The web site above is a great resource. Check it out! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just bought 2 gal of PPG Concept AU (over 3 gal when mixed) Toyota
Super White 90288 and 2 gal of PCL Polyprimer (white)...........................$1032.00 The control surfaces on the DG-300 I'm rebuilding have been stripped, filled, sanded with 80g followed be 220 dry and look good to go for painting. I use a 4 power magnifying glass with a drop lite to spot anything I missed (old eyes). The 80 grit scratches will disappear on the second coat and will insure a good "tooth" is given to the paint which is important anywhere you will be taping (wing roots). One thing that hasen't been mentioned is a good water trap. All compressors produce water and it must be trapped or your paint job will be pock-marked with thousands of little craters caused when water droplets form on the spray nozzle. I use a toilet-paper water trap and it does the job, just replace the roll before each new job...........................you can even dry out the old filter and use it for its origional purpose! Cheep-o, JJ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
refinishing | Stig Pedersen | Soaring | 1 | November 27th 05 04:50 PM |
refinishing | Stig Pedersen | Soaring | 1 | November 26th 05 09:16 PM |
Refinishing: Who has tried a shortcut? | Ian Forbes | Soaring | 60 | December 26th 03 09:30 AM |
REFINISHING | Ventus B | Soaring | 32 | December 3rd 03 10:14 PM |
Refinishing gelcoat | tango4 | Soaring | 21 | November 3rd 03 07:29 AM |