A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ping Dan Thomas/weird crashes.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 29th 08, 02:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 442
Default ping Dan Thomas/weird crashes.

I'm wondering about foul-play going on here,
http://canadianpress.google.com/arti...KW6KPMty3h8HjQ

When his dad crashed a few months ago it was big
news cuz a little girl survived, but now he crashes with
a really strange debris field.

It's really strange to me.
Ken
  #2  
Old March 29th 08, 07:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Private
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 188
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

FYI

http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h

http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890

http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...4184/catid,55/

Condolences to family & friends.


  #3  
Old March 29th 08, 10:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

On Mar 29, 1:03*am, "Private" wrote:
Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

FYI

http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h

http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890

http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...

Condolences to family & friends.


The pic that is posted on the Flightaware site is interesting. Is
shows an almost complete cockpit with very little damage. Too bad
these guys couldn't have hit a 20 foot deep pile of fluffy powder
snow. They might have survived...

Godspeed to all involved..

Ben
  #4  
Old March 30th 08, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

On Mar 29, 3:22 pm, " wrote:
On Mar 29, 1:03 am, "Private" wrote:

Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


The pic that is posted on the Flightaware site is interesting. Is
shows an almost complete cockpit with very little damage. Too bad
these guys couldn't have hit a 20 foot deep pile of fluffy powder
snow. They might have survived...

Godspeed to all involved..

Ben


On the news a few minutes ago, the TSB guys indicated that it had
been an inflight breakup. That can be caused by several factors,
including spiralling out of control, severe turbulence, or some pre-
existing flaw leading to structural failure. It will take the
investigators some time to figure it out, and even then they're
sometimes not sure. I won't speculate further, but will say that
inflight structural failure is one of the things that scares me most;
the other is a midair collision. I pay a lot of attention to the
structural inspections of our aircraft, and have my eyeballs all over
the place when VFR.
Deep snow wouldn't help much if it was an inflight breakup. Most
frequent failures involve the tail, and an airplane will stick its
nose straight down if the stab departs.

Dan
  #5  
Old March 30th 08, 06:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

On Mar 29, 5:37 pm, wrote:
On Mar 29, 3:22 pm, " wrote:



On Mar 29, 1:03 am, "Private" wrote:


Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


The pic that is posted on the Flightaware site is interesting. Is
shows an almost complete cockpit with very little damage. Too bad
these guys couldn't have hit a 20 foot deep pile of fluffy powder
snow. They might have survived...


Godspeed to all involved..


Ben


On the news a few minutes ago, the TSB guys indicated that it had
been an inflight breakup. That can be caused by several factors,
including spiralling out of control, severe turbulence, or some pre-
existing flaw leading to structural failure. It will take the
investigators some time to figure it out, and even then they're
sometimes not sure. I won't speculate further, but will say that
inflight structural failure is one of the things that scares me most;
the other is a midair collision. I pay a lot of attention to the
structural inspections of our aircraft, and have my eyeballs all over
the place when VFR.
Deep snow wouldn't help much if it was an inflight breakup. Most
frequent failures involve the tail, and an airplane will stick its
nose straight down if the stab departs.

Dan


http://www.canada.com/globaltv/natio...7adfa6&k=54326
  #6  
Old March 31st 08, 01:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 442
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

On Mar 30, 9:04 am, wrote:
On Mar 29, 5:37 pm, wrote:



On Mar 29, 3:22 pm, " wrote:


On Mar 29, 1:03 am, "Private" wrote:


Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


The pic that is posted on the Flightaware site is interesting. Is
shows an almost complete cockpit with very little damage. Too bad
these guys couldn't have hit a 20 foot deep pile of fluffy powder
snow. They might have survived...


Godspeed to all involved..


Ben


On the news a few minutes ago, the TSB guys indicated that it had
been an inflight breakup. That can be caused by several factors,
including spiralling out of control, severe turbulence, or some pre-
existing flaw leading to structural failure. It will take the
investigators some time to figure it out, and even then they're
sometimes not sure. I won't speculate further, but will say that
inflight structural failure is one of the things that scares me most;
the other is a midair collision. I pay a lot of attention to the
structural inspections of our aircraft, and have my eyeballs all over
the place when VFR.
Deep snow wouldn't help much if it was an inflight breakup. Most
frequent failures involve the tail, and an airplane will stick its
nose straight down if the stab departs.


Dan


http://www.canada.com/globaltv/natio...ce7fefa-920d-4...


Thanks Dan, (tears aside).
"Dean Braithwaite, chief flight instructor at the Edmonton Flying
Club"
sounds good in that ref.
We've recently discussed the importance of the Artificial
Horizon in this group,

Maybe the pilot ascended above 12500, that can **** up
judgement, went spiral dive (blam) and blamed the AH,
for judgement error. The debris field indicates an aircraft
structural anomally at high altitude.

My GUESS is he was trying to ascend above the weather,
did a stall in lowered air density, converted to a spiral dive,
that shattered the a/c in a few hundred feet at fairly high
altitude.
In a spiral dive the a/c is using gravity to accelerate, it's
like jumping off a building and it comes on fast.

Every pilot must know when he's in a spiral dive and
how to correct it.
Hard input will shatter the a/c, especially if IAS is near
red line, which happens quickly, so be gentle.

In my experience, gentle application of elevator with
reverse aileron is ok. However, jerking the elevator
can snug the turn and exceed the g-rating, specially
if the airlerons are used inappropriately.
I'd like to hear an expert opinion.
Ken
  #7  
Old April 1st 08, 08:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Private
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 188
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob UPDATE


"Private" wrote in message
...
Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob

FYI

http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h

http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890

http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...4184/catid,55/

Condolences to family & friends.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...ub=CTVNewsAt11

http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=n


  #8  
Old April 1st 08, 05:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 442
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob UPDATE

On Mar 31, 11:02 pm, "Private" wrote:
"Private" wrote in message

...

Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...80329/alta_pla...

http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=n


This is news to me,
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjourna...8-825a02ca8ec5

So in IFR in dense cloud, the AH starts going funny,
one still x-checks against the heading indicator and
the altimeter/rate of descent.
Finally there's the magnetic compass that is fool-
proof, (not idiot proof-Bertie couldn't find it ;-).
For rate of descent, the power setting vs, KIAS gives
a fair good idea of the rate of descent.

That all works for a 1/2 ass pilot, however if the cabin
pressure had a slow leak, and the pilot slowly looses
mental faculties, (Bertie is a typical example), that
could lead to pilot confusion.
Ken
  #9  
Old April 1st 08, 05:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dan[_10_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 650
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob UPDATE

On Apr 1, 12:06 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Mar 31, 11:02 pm, "Private" wrote:



"Private" wrote in message


...


Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...80329/alta_pla...


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=n


This is news to me,http://www.canada.com/edmontonjourna...d=1c6483cc-309...

So in IFR in dense cloud, the AH starts going funny,
one still x-checks against the heading indicator and
the altimeter/rate of descent.
Finally there's the magnetic compass that is fool-
proof, (not idiot proof-Bertie couldn't find it ;-).
For rate of descent, the power setting vs, KIAS gives
a fair good idea of the rate of descent.

That all works for a 1/2 ass pilot, however if the cabin
pressure had a slow leak, and the pilot slowly looses
mental faculties, (Bertie is a typical example), that
could lead to pilot confusion.
Ken


And the last time you flew partial panel in IMC was....?
  #10  
Old April 1st 08, 06:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 442
Default Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob UPDATE

On Apr 1, 8:19 am, Dan wrote:
On Apr 1, 12:06 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:



On Mar 31, 11:02 pm, "Private" wrote:


"Private" wrote in message


...


Piper Malibu down east of Edmonton 5 sob


FYI


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=h


http://discussions.flightaware.com/v...?p=47890#47890


http://www.aviation.ca/component/opt...temid,306/func...


Condolences to family & friends.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...80329/alta_pla...


http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&ta...577933&topic=n


This is news to me,http://www.canada.com/edmontonjourna...d=1c6483cc-309...


So in IFR in dense cloud, the AH starts going funny,
one still x-checks against the heading indicator and
the altimeter/rate of descent.
Finally there's the magnetic compass that is fool-
proof, (not idiot proof-Bertie couldn't find it ;-).
For rate of descent, the power setting vs, KIAS gives
a fair good idea of the rate of descent.


That all works for a 1/2 ass pilot, however if the cabin
pressure had a slow leak, and the pilot slowly looses
mental faculties, (Bertie is a typical example), that
could lead to pilot confusion.
Ken


And the last time you flew partial panel in IMC was....?


I was blind-folded, and the instruments were in Brail.
That excersize was conducted at night in clouds with
total electrical failure. To play it safe I did an extended
flare over the numbers, that's because I had two dead
jet engines and had to dead stick without flaps, SOP.

How about you Dan?
Ken
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All this Barron Thomas stuff xyzzy Owning 7 September 9th 05 03:13 AM
Thomas Roberts Udo Rumpf Soaring 0 February 29th 04 12:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.