757 avionics

some questions if anyone knows the answers...

is 757 fly by wire or fly by cable?

The FMCS has full flight and landing capability, is it a separate control
system?

The FANS network, is it capable of directing "goto location/altitude" and
"set airspeed to K" type commands to the plane?

Is the yoke and throttle a completely separate control system from the
FMCS control system or are they common?

is the throttle control in cockpit only routed through FMCS ?

I read that the yoke was capable of exerting more power on the surfaces
than the FMCS could, essentially giving yoke priority, is that correct?
If so can you describe how that works?

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before? do you have a thread reference?
what newsgroup? around what date?

FriarTuck wrote in news:4trFk.4623$8T1.1260
@newsfe28.ams2:

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before? do you have a thread reference?
what newsgroup? around what date?


Look in the conspirawhacko groups, especially right after 9-11..

alt.conspiracy in particular, but also all of the aviation groups.
There's volumes on whether a 757 could be flown remotely and volumes of
explanations on why it couldn't be.





Bertie

On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

wrote in news:dd1b41a5-1df4-49ca-9895-e7325985c9e3
@e2g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?



K00k alert!

Bertie

On 3 Okt, 18:31, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
wrote in news:dd1b41a5-1df4-49ca-9895-e7325985c9e3
@e2g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:



On 3 Okt, 18:09, FriarTuck wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:19 +0000, Mike wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

has it been asked and answered before?

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

K00k alert!

Bertie

Absolutely...

On Oct 4, 4:20*am, wrote:

The question as to whether the 757 is FBW or not certainly has been...
Why don't you ask them what diameter the turn Hanjour made was? Or try
and explain to them how it would have been impossible for him to have
flown it, even though you don't knwo what the diameter of the turn
was? Or how, if he had flown it, you feel he would have probably
entered a "graveyard turn" despite it being mid-morning on a CAVU
day?

If you ignore the kook typeover messages this video was taken off a
kook site and shows a graphic of the socalled 'impossible' turn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0
At no time does the turn exceed a slow descending rate 2 turn and is
generally a rate1 throughout !

"Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote in news:f7rFk.410$yI6.46
@nwrddc01.gnilink.net:

"FriarTuck" wrote in message
...
some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?



Step into my parlour.


Bertie

On 3 Okt, 17:46, "Mike" nospam@ microsoft.com wrote:
"FriarTuck" wrote in message

...

some questions if anyone knows the answers...

A better question is...

Why should anyone answer the questions of a troll who asks the same
questions using different sock puppets?

Ahem... by no means the same question, and I can assure you I'm not
one of Ducky's sockpuppets. He looked up a wiki article on the 757
FMCS and decided it meant that the 757 was FBW.