Who de-activated ground-air missiles on 9-11?

The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. When a plane
enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a
message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it
to enter the space. If that is not done within seconds, the plane is
automatically shot down with missiles

Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot
of Flight 77 give them the code. But surely he would have given them
the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and
beat the correct code out of him.

Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave
the hijackers the code before-hand.

This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.


Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message
...
The Pentagon is protected by a computerized system. When a plane
enters the pentagon protected space the computer automatically sends a
message to the plane demanding the pilot punch in a code allowing it
to enter the space. If that is not done within seconds, the plane is
automatically shot down with missiles

Now you might say the hijackers knew about this and demanded the pilot
of Flight 77 give them the code. But surely he would have given them
the wrong code and there would be no time to retrun to the pilot and
beat the correct code out of him.

Either the missile system was de-activated that day or someone gave
the hijackers the code before-hand.

From: "lysdexic"

This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.

This fool gets his jollies making things like this up. I wouldn't be the least
bit surprised he types one handed while making this stuff up and watching
people's reactions.

Best to kill file the fool.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

B2431 wrote:

Best to kill file the fool.

I don't know about anyone else, but I killfile anything that
is crossposted to 3 or more groups, so I didn't see this
thread at all until you stripped out the other groups from
the headers.

In general I have found anything crossposted to 3 groups or
more is useless drivel of one sort or another. Crossposting
to 2 groups is usually on topic and relevant.

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.

On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic"
wrote:

This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.



Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message
...
On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic"
wrote:

This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had
no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this
and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.



Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?

how do you expect anyone to address the issue when you cannot even address
his question as to whether or not you made it up?

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message
...

Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?


What issue?

In article et,
on Mon, 10 May 2004 22:11:12 GMT,
Steven P. McNicoll attempted to say .....


Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote in message
...

Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?


What issue?

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In article ,
on Mon, 10 May 2004 13:34:06 -0600,
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend Laura Bush murdered her boy friend
attempted to say .....

On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic"
wrote:

This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.



Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?


Why don't you provide some documentation for your claim ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2004 12:08:47 -0700, "lysdexic"
wrote:


This is bull. I haven't been on this board for long but suspected you had no
credibility. Either you are ignorant enough to believe stuff like this and
regurgitate it or you made it up. Either way you are not credible.




Thank you for the namecalling. Now why don't you address the issue?

There is no issue to address. Your entire scenario is specious.
There is no "code to be punched in" when approaching a given airspace,
and the Pentagon was not defended by SAM emplacements prior to 9/11.
As such, you are asking someone to defend something that didn't happen
with a system that doesn't exist.

Mike