A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Spruce Goose Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 6th 09, 05:00 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Therefore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Spruce Goose Question

Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only

....................Leslie

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
  #2  
Old March 6th 09, 06:10 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Wayne Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 905
Default Spruce Goose Question

The mission? I think its' only mission was to prove it could fly. That it
did if only briefly.

Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder

"Therefore" wrote in message
. ..
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only
....................Leslie

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access



  #3  
Old March 6th 09, 09:28 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Spruce Goose Question


"Therefore" wrote in message
. ..
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only


Something more like a half mile, or mile, as I recall.

It never got out of ground affect, though. That still does not tell whether
it could have climbed out, and done it with a load.

Your question is one of the great mysteries in aviation. Since Hughes did
not say much about how it flew, we don't even know if he thought it would
fly the mission. He only wanted to prove that it would fly, and he did it
once, and parked it. Too bad.

My personal belief is that it would have had the range and lift. It sure
had enough wing area, and engines.
--
Jim in NC


  #4  
Old March 6th 09, 10:30 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mike Henley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Spruce Goose Question


"Therefore" wrote in message
. ..
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only
....................Leslie

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


Here is a posting from a pilot in the Hughes Tool Company aircraft division
telling about a conversation that he had with the chief engineer of the
aircraft.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...06/ai_n9455603

He says there was a problem with the ailerons. I have also read articles by
other people who said they didn't think the airframe could survive the
pounding from storms in the Atlantic.


  #5  
Old August 20th 15, 03:13 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Spruce Goose Question

I think it it could have been developed in a reasonable time, it could
have been a very important aircraft. But Howard Hughes being the man
he was...lost interest in the plane..and as time went by technology
passed it by...and left it just a curiousity. As a side note..since
it was designed, built and made its only flight in Southern California
that's where it should of remained, instead of being shipped up to
Washington state...just my opinion



On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:30:57 -0800, "Mike Henley"
wrote:


"Therefore" wrote in message
...
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only
....................Leslie

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


Here is a posting from a pilot in the Hughes Tool Company aircraft division
telling about a conversation that he had with the chief engineer of the
aircraft.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...06/ai_n9455603

He says there was a problem with the ailerons. I have also read articles by
other people who said they didn't think the airframe could survive the
pounding from storms in the Atlantic.

  #8  
Old August 20th 15, 09:21 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Bob (not my real pseudonym)[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,066
Default Spruce Goose Question

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:13:26 -0700, wrote:

I think it it could have been developed in a reasonable time, it could
have been a very important aircraft. But Howard Hughes being the man
he was...lost interest in the plane..and as time went by technology
passed it by...and left it just a curiousity. As a side note..since
it was designed, built and made its only flight in Southern California
that's where it should of remained, instead of being shipped up to
Washington state...just my opinion


Actually, it is in McMinnville OR.

On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:30:57 -0800, "Mike Henley"
wrote:


"Therefore" wrote in message
m...
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for.

I have read that only one test was flown just above the water
for a few yards only
....................Leslie

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access


Here is a posting from a pilot in the Hughes Tool Company aircraft division
telling about a conversation that he had with the chief engineer of the
aircraft.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...06/ai_n9455603

He says there was a problem with the ailerons. I have also read articles by
other people who said they didn't think the airframe could survive the
pounding from storms in the Atlantic.

  #9  
Old August 20th 15, 07:48 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Byker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,490
Default Spruce Goose Question

wrote in message ...

I think it it could have been developed in a reasonable time, it could
have been a very important aircraft.


I grew up about twenty miles from where it was stored all those years,
knowing it as the Hughes Hercules, not the "Spruce Goose". Right up to the
day he died, I half-expected Howie to wake up with a wild hair up his ass
some morning and take it out for a flight. I finally got to see it in 1986
when it was on display next to the Queen Mary in Long Beach.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F105 under the Spruce Goose R W Hughes Aviation Photos 0 March 6th 09 05:18 AM
spruce goose wing - 11" thick Bo[_4_] Aviation Photos 3 November 28th 08 11:16 PM
[03/30] - 03 Entrance Spruce Goose Gallery.JPG (1/1) Another try Waldo.Pepper[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 September 10th 08 06:22 AM
Photos of the inside of the Spruce Goose Ron Garret Piloting 5 November 14th 06 02:10 PM
Off Topic - Spruce Goose Steve Beaver Home Built 30 January 24th 04 05:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.