![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose
would have accomplished the mission it was built for. I have read that only one test was flown just above the water for a few yards only ....................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The mission? I think its' only mission was to prove it could fly. That it
did if only briefly. Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder "Therefore" wrote in message . .. Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose would have accomplished the mission it was built for. I have read that only one test was flown just above the water for a few yards only ....................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Therefore" wrote in message . .. Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose would have accomplished the mission it was built for. I have read that only one test was flown just above the water for a few yards only Something more like a half mile, or mile, as I recall. It never got out of ground affect, though. That still does not tell whether it could have climbed out, and done it with a load. Your question is one of the great mysteries in aviation. Since Hughes did not say much about how it flew, we don't even know if he thought it would fly the mission. He only wanted to prove that it would fly, and he did it once, and parked it. Too bad. My personal belief is that it would have had the range and lift. It sure had enough wing area, and engines. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Therefore" wrote in message . .. Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose would have accomplished the mission it was built for. I have read that only one test was flown just above the water for a few yards only ....................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Here is a posting from a pilot in the Hughes Tool Company aircraft division telling about a conversation that he had with the chief engineer of the aircraft. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...06/ai_n9455603 He says there was a problem with the ailerons. I have also read articles by other people who said they didn't think the airframe could survive the pounding from storms in the Atlantic. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it it could have been developed in a reasonable time, it could
have been a very important aircraft. But Howard Hughes being the man he was...lost interest in the plane..and as time went by technology passed it by...and left it just a curiousity. As a side note..since it was designed, built and made its only flight in Southern California that's where it should of remained, instead of being shipped up to Washington state...just my opinion On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:30:57 -0800, "Mike Henley" wrote: "Therefore" wrote in message ... Is there any information as to whether or not the Goose would have accomplished the mission it was built for. I have read that only one test was flown just above the water for a few yards only ....................Leslie -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access Here is a posting from a pilot in the Hughes Tool Company aircraft division telling about a conversation that he had with the chief engineer of the aircraft. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...06/ai_n9455603 He says there was a problem with the ailerons. I have also read articles by other people who said they didn't think the airframe could survive the pounding from storms in the Atlantic. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message ...
I think it it could have been developed in a reasonable time, it could have been a very important aircraft. I grew up about twenty miles from where it was stored all those years, knowing it as the Hughes Hercules, not the "Spruce Goose". Right up to the day he died, I half-expected Howie to wake up with a wild hair up his ass some morning and take it out for a flight. I finally got to see it in 1986 when it was on display next to the Queen Mary in Long Beach. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F105 under the Spruce Goose | R W Hughes | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 6th 09 05:18 AM |
spruce goose wing - 11" thick | Bo[_4_] | Aviation Photos | 3 | November 28th 08 11:16 PM |
[03/30] - 03 Entrance Spruce Goose Gallery.JPG (1/1) Another try | Waldo.Pepper[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 10th 08 06:22 AM |
Photos of the inside of the Spruce Goose | Ron Garret | Piloting | 5 | November 14th 06 02:10 PM |
Off Topic - Spruce Goose | Steve Beaver | Home Built | 30 | January 24th 04 05:59 AM |