PUMA IFV... Best in the World... No Surprise

http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl...UTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

From: (robert arndt)
Date: 6/17/2004 9:32 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl...de/english/ind
ex.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

It is "under development" according to your cite. Are you so blinded by anti
U.S. sentiment that you don't understand what this means?

I will simplify it for you: underdevelopment means it is not fielded, has not
seen combat, still doesn't have all the bugs worked out and can't be compared
to a system that already exists.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: (robert arndt)
Date: 6/17/2004 9:32 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:


http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl...de/english/ind
ex.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

It is "under development" according to your cite. Are you so blinded by
anti
U.S. sentiment that you don't understand what this means?

I will simplify it for you: underdevelopment means it is not fielded, has
not
seen combat, still doesn't have all the bugs worked out and can't be
compared
to a system that already exists.

Dan, come now...you know all of that is well beyond Arndt's comprehension
level. The poor guy is in denial regarding the fact that the Germans
themselves are slashing their own armored forces, and actually thinks they
are actively pursuing a new generation MBT. He is apparently allergic to
facts/reality, as we have repeatedly seen each and every time he starts
doing his Doctor Strangelove impersonation in regards to the superiority of
all things German, as especially Nazi, developed--and even those that were
not developed, like his flying saucers...

Brooks


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

It is "under development" according to your cite. Are you so blinded by
anti
U.S. sentiment that you don't understand what this means?

Yes, he is. That's the MO of most of the non-American posters he troll
around, look for any news of "American decline" or "the rest of the world
catching up/doing better" than the US (witness the India vs USAF article),
and post stuff like this.

On 17 Jun 2004 07:32:56 -0700, (robert arndt) wrote:

http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl...UTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

Nazi jerk

Al Minyard

From: Alan Minyard
Date: 6/22/2004 1:02 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 17 Jun 2004 07:32:56 -0700, (robert arndt) wrote:


http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl....de/english/in
dex.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

Nazi jerk

Al Minyard

Al, please note the only cite teuton gives is the manufacturers brochure.
Should we ask if he has any independant cite from any recognized testing
agency? Would he be able to come up with any from a site other than his usual
UFO sources?

The world wants to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

(B2431) wrote:
From: Alan Minyard
Date: 6/22/2004 1:02 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 17 Jun 2004 07:32:56 -0700,
(robert arndt) wrote:


http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl....de/english/in
dex.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG

Bradley is a P.O.S. by comparison.

Rob

Nazi jerk

Al Minyard

Al, please note the only cite teuton gives is
the manufacturers brochure.
Should we ask if he has any independant cite
from any recognized testing
agency? Would he be able to come up with any
from a site other than his usual
UFO sources?

The world wants to know.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Not to mention that none of the vehicles he seems to promote have any sort
of combat record (if German) or have a pretty sorry one (if Soviet)-we all
know the shortcomings of Soviet armor-but he doesn't seem to notice. And
when's the last time a German-made tank or APC went into combat in a real
war situation? (Peacekeeping doesn't count)

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:17:23 GMT, "Matt Wiser"
wrote:


Not to mention that none of the vehicles he seems to promote have any sort
of combat record (if German) or have a pretty sorry one (if Soviet)-we all
know the shortcomings of Soviet armor-but he doesn't seem to notice. And
when's the last time a German-made tank or APC went into combat in a real
war situation? (Peacekeeping doesn't count)

2002. Fox NBC vehcles are use by both the US and British armies, and
both deployed them in Op IF.

Peter Kemp

Peter Kemp wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:17:23 GMT, "Matt Wiser"
wrote:


Not to mention that none of the vehicles
he seems to promote have any sort
of combat record (if German) or have a pretty
sorry one (if Soviet)-we all
know the shortcomings of Soviet armor-but he
doesn't seem to notice. And
when's the last time a German-made tank or
APC went into combat in a real
war situation? (Peacekeeping doesn't count)

2002. Fox NBC vehcles are use by both the US
and British armies, and
both deployed them in Op IF.

Peter Kemp
I stand corrected on the Fox, but the real intent was heavy stuff: tanks,
SP guns, IFVs, etc.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!