A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rogue IFR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 24th 03, 04:15 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...
PIREPs are assumed to be accurate.


That doesn't mean ATC can rely on them to KNOW something.

Besides, even a PIREP does not imply IFR conditions in the exact spot the
target is flying. The PIREP is valid for a specific point in space at a
specific point in time. Assuming there was no collision, obviously the
target aircraft was not in that specific point in space at that specific
point in time.

It's pretty funny, actually, the way you can't help yourself and insist on
arguing even when someone is supporting the point you're trying to make.
Thanks for the good laugh...

Pete


  #32  
Old October 24th 03, 04:54 AM
Larry Fransson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2003-10-23 17:27:46 -0700, (null) said:

You mean, if there was some cloud cover that you wanted to go through,
to get into the clear above, you cannot do that legally, even if you are
IFR rated, unless you file an IFR plan?


You can if you're outside controlled airspace.

--
Larry Fransson
Seattle, WA
  #33  
Old October 24th 03, 04:57 AM
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Natalie writes:

He was breaking the regs if you were in controlled airspace (just about everywhere
above 1200' in many parts of the country).


The obvious solution, then, is to ignore the instruments and try to
squint through the clouds. That way his tombstone can say that he died
without violating regulations.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
  #34  
Old October 24th 03, 05:32 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Student pilots are still taught cloud clearance requirements and why.
Apparently your friend chooses to forget what he was taught.


  #35  
Old October 24th 03, 05:47 AM
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" writes:

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...
PIREPs are assumed to be accurate.


That doesn't mean ATC can rely on them to KNOW something.


snip

Are you the type of guy that wonders every day if the sun will rise?

  #36  
Old October 24th 03, 07:07 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...
Are you the type of guy that wonders every day if the sun will rise?


I have no idea how that in any way relates to the question at hand.


  #37  
Old October 24th 03, 12:14 PM
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roger Long" om wrote in message
He said with a completely straight face that he's thinking of getting an
instrument rating because he "flies in IMC a lot." He does OK but would
like to be able to ask ATC where the other planes are and fly into towered
airports.


something that happenened to me a while back: flying in solid IMC with
an instructor (one of these really cool CFI who aren't afraid
of actual IMC...) when ATC told us to watch out for VFR traffic a couple of
miles away on our twelve oclock... we told ATC that, well, we were
in actual (neat layer, there was no way the other guy was just outside
the clouds). Gave us one of these funny sensation in our stomach to think
about it...

--Sylvain
  #38  
Old October 24th 03, 02:41 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Seriously though, I'm sure the accuracy of the GPS and the cute little
moving map makes this much more tempting, and thus, common.


I'm sure you are correct -- especially for pilots with some IFR training.

Myself, for example. I don't have the IR, due to a myriad of time
constraints -- yet I've got all the flying requirements under my belt. I'm
sure I can keep my wings level in the soup as well as any newly minted
instrument pilot.

That said, could I fly an unauthorized instrument approach into Iowa City
using my giant color AvMap? Sure! In fact, I'd wager that I could fly a
BETTER instrument approach using just the AvMap, as opposed to (for example)
flying the full VOR 36 approach into Iowa City.

Would it be legal? Nope. Would it be safe? Except for the
not-talking-to-ATC part, yup. Would I do it? Nope. My ticket -- and my
family's lives -- are too valuable to me to risk on something so stupid.

But I'm sure there are those who would...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #39  
Old October 24th 03, 02:57 PM
Roger Long
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We're talking here about a 150-200 hour pilot with no instrument training
other than that required for the PP
intentionally launching into weather that some new IFR ticket holders would
have the sense to avoid.

Being at about that level of experience myself, I can't imagine anyone being
tempted to try this without the very accurate position information provided
by the GPS. I'm sure people did it with Loran, and some even with just
gauges but I bet there were a lot less of them and they didn't get away with
it as long. There is something very seductive about seeing that little
airplane symbol on a full color map.

I'm also pretty sure that, if he weren't flying something as stable as a
Skyhawk, I'd have already read the account of his last flight.
--
Roger Long


  #40  
Old October 24th 03, 03:10 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roger Long":
What does ATC do when they see a 1200 target boring through what:
they know is solid IMC?


Nothing. They don't *know* it's IMC where the VFR target is on the screen.

The only time I've ever heard an ATC comment about something like this was
west of Houston one day. A pilot reported climbing through a solid cloud
deck at the same time another pilot was reporting "jumpers away" from his
meat bomb hauler nearby. The controller said something like "I don't know
who it is for sure, but somebody's fibbing."
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is missile defense? An expensive fraud Bush needs Poland as a future nuclear battlefield Paul J. Adam Military Aviation 1 August 9th 04 08:29 PM
About when did a US/CCCP war become suicidal? james_anatidae Military Aviation 96 February 29th 04 03:24 PM
US plans 6,000mph bomber to hit rogue regimes from edge of space Otis Willie Military Aviation 14 August 5th 03 01:48 AM
Rogue State jukita Military Aviation 18 July 13th 03 02:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.