![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ken wrote:
both - you will get secondary effects from the aileron bank causing yaw and the aircraft will "weathercock" into wind. For those sceptics who don't believe the aircraft will weathercock fly hands off with no rudder trim/bias (and reduced power so there is no slipstream effect) and see what happens, it will turn into wind. Well, you could look at as you describe, or just say that the plane doesn't like slips/skids (as a result of its inherent stability) which is the way I think of it. Koopas Ly wrote: Just a quick question... During a crosswind landing, for instance a left crosswind, you'd lower the left, upwind wing to counter the right drift induced by the crosswind. You'd also use some right rudder to keep the nose straight and prevent it from "weathervaning". Is this "weathervaning effect" caused by your leftward relative motion due to the left bank OR by the rightward crosswind ITSELF? What's the difference? Remember, we always think about 'relative' motion. Next thing I was wondering, which is related to the above: say you're dead on centerline on landing, and all of a sudden a crosswind from the left starts blowing. The effect would be that you should only be displaced to the right of runway centerline. Your airplane nose would still be parallel to the centerline. Do you agree? No, due to the aircraft's stability, it would yaw to the left. Hilton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|