![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Nouak" wrote in message ... "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... snip Too late; you already do. Actually, we don't. You do, though. Actually you do, and your crime statistics prove it. You just choose to bury your head in the sand and hope the allmighty government will take care of you like a good parent. For the record, that's how dictatorships are started. I feel your pain. The only pain you are going to feel is the one where you wake up 10 years from now and realize that you no longer have any individual rights because you chose to allow your government to disarm it's population. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message ... "Martin Hotze" wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:15:33 GMT, Steven P. McNicoll wrote: I avoid everybody carrying a weapon. And as long as I can decide it (!) nobody with a weapon is entering my house, my office or sitting in my car. And I turn away from everybody carrying a weapon, I also avoid beeing too close to cops carrying a weapon. What do you do when those that carry guns don't give a damn what you decide? aaahh! now comes logic from cold war. Give everybody a nuke, but give me one nuke more than him. Seems to have worked out pretty well, no? or: ... Zombie (The Cranberries) How profound. to your question: so I should arm myself and my family and first shoot, then ask? I don't want to life in such a world. Thank you. Too late; you already do. Now please tell me the logic in depending on the goodwill of the lawless and criminal to respect your pascifism. It really seems to have worked like a charm in the UK where soon after banning firearms alltogether, gun related crimes went sky-high. It is all relative and with hand guns being outlawed completely possessing a gun became a crime. With gun crime being so low any increase looks big. Funnily enough gun related crime tends to be restricted to the criminals shooting each other not the public. The main problems in London tend to be Russian mafia against Albanian mafia, blacks against blacks (Yardies), drug dealers against drug dealers. What we don't get are kids killing each other by accident because Dad left his gun lying about and we don't get wacko kids going into school blasting everyone in sight and we don't get guys sniping away at the public either. The police here take a firm view with anyone with what looks like a gun. They shoot them. The assumption is that as there can be no lawful purpose to be waving a gun around then shooting dead someone with a gun who refuses to surrender is legitimate. Therefore the only ones who need to worry are the nuts who like guns and criminals. Even a toy gun risks getting the holder shot if the police are uncertain of the weapon. Thank fully our police tend to finish gun business with the odd bullet rather than a shootout. And you see nothing wrong with this scenario? It dosen't strike you as maybe a bit tyrannical that owning a toy gun may get you shot by a police officer? You surrender your rights far too easily, and I am afraid that if a majority of your population feels similarly, you days as a free people are numbered. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message ... "Michael Nouak" wrote in message ... "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... snip Too late; you already do. Actually, we don't. You do, though. Actually you do, and your crime statistics prove it. You just choose to bury your head in the sand and hope the allmighty government will take care of you like a good parent. For the record, that's how dictatorships are started. I feel your pain. The only pain you are going to feel is the one where you wake up 10 years from now and realize that you no longer have any individual rights because you chose to allow your government to disarm it's population. You don't have many rights now despite your guns. The Feds can do as they please and as long as shmucks like you keep encouraging them on they are gonna continue grabbing more power. The lamest excuse and the rational of all tyrants is "National Security". Its been used time and time again to curtail individual freedoms. That's the lesson - but the dumbasses that elect politicians like we have are too stupid to realise that they are giving away their freedoms. The politicians are not dumb. They will let you keep your guns but strip you of everything else. Whilst the "kids" have their "toys" they will be happy. The politicians love you. You make it so easy for them. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message ... "Dave" wrote in message ... "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message ... "Martin Hotze" wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:15:33 GMT, Steven P. McNicoll wrote: I avoid everybody carrying a weapon. And as long as I can decide it (!) nobody with a weapon is entering my house, my office or sitting in my car. And I turn away from everybody carrying a weapon, I also avoid beeing too close to cops carrying a weapon. What do you do when those that carry guns don't give a damn what you decide? aaahh! now comes logic from cold war. Give everybody a nuke, but give me one nuke more than him. Seems to have worked out pretty well, no? or: ... Zombie (The Cranberries) How profound. to your question: so I should arm myself and my family and first shoot, then ask? I don't want to life in such a world. Thank you. Too late; you already do. Now please tell me the logic in depending on the goodwill of the lawless and criminal to respect your pascifism. It really seems to have worked like a charm in the UK where soon after banning firearms alltogether, gun related crimes went sky-high. It is all relative and with hand guns being outlawed completely possessing a gun became a crime. With gun crime being so low any increase looks big. Funnily enough gun related crime tends to be restricted to the criminals shooting each other not the public. The main problems in London tend to be Russian mafia against Albanian mafia, blacks against blacks (Yardies), drug dealers against drug dealers. What we don't get are kids killing each other by accident because Dad left his gun lying about and we don't get wacko kids going into school blasting everyone in sight and we don't get guys sniping away at the public either. The police here take a firm view with anyone with what looks like a gun. They shoot them. The assumption is that as there can be no lawful purpose to be waving a gun around then shooting dead someone with a gun who refuses to surrender is legitimate. Therefore the only ones who need to worry are the nuts who like guns and criminals. Even a toy gun risks getting the holder shot if the police are uncertain of the weapon. Thank fully our police tend to finish gun business with the odd bullet rather than a shootout. And you see nothing wrong with this scenario? It dosen't strike you as maybe a bit tyrannical that owning a toy gun may get you shot by a police officer? You surrender your rights far too easily, and I am afraid that if a majority of your population feels similarly, you days as a free people are numbered. Nothing wrong with it at all. Guns are illegal. We voted for it, after a Columbine type incident. We surrendered our licenced sporting guns. Therefore anyone still with a gun or making out that they were using what looked like a gun to rob or frighten people must bear the consequences. It is about personal responsibility and choices. Having a gun is no big deal. It does not make you a better person. It might make you feel a bit more secure when there are loads of loonies around with guns. Likewise when the chances of meeting someone with a gun is remote do we worry about being armed? I would only worry if I was mixing with people who carry guns. As I don't mix with criminals its not an issue. If our police don't see the need to be constantly armed then why should the population at large. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Likewise when the chances of meeting someone with a gun is remote do we worry about being armed? I would only worry if I was mixing with people who carry guns. As I don't mix with criminals its not an issue. Oh, you lock yourself up in your castle? What happens if you encounter a thug with a length of pipe on the way to the pub? Which, by the way, if far more likely to happen in London than in Norfolk, VA. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dan Luke"
writes: I find the company of my fellow honest citizens who are armed to be comforting. I don't. Many of my fellow honest citizens don't have sense enough to pour water out of a boot. Anyone who can vote can carry a gun in many states: considering the quality of elected officials, how comforting is that? It must be niced to be so sure of your superiority over your fellow citizens. I must point out that operating a car responsibly requires a great deal more skill and judgment than operating a handgun. Responsible use of a handgun simply requires leaving it in its holster until something so bad happens that anything you do with the gun will be better. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote: It must be niced to be so sure of your superiority over your fellow citizens. I said many, not all. Are you telling me you don't feel your judgement is superior to that of many of your fellow citizens? If so, how then do you account for the fact that you hold political views that place you in a minority? I must point out that operating a car responsibly requires a great deal more skill and judgment than operating a handgun. Requires it, maybe, but does it always get it? Responsible use of a handgun simply requires leaving it in its holster until something so bad happens that anything you do with the gun will be better. Well, there's the rub, isn't it? Are we to assume that all gun toters can judge such situations so nicely? -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Nouak" wrote in message ... "Thomas J. Paladino Jr." schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... snip Is that a threat? Sure sounds like it to me. For your sake, I hope not because I just reported you to the FBI. Good luck entering the country if you should ever have to. Boy, if I was Dave, I'd be ****tin' my pants now. NOT! Mike Haven't the terrorists won? They have caused paranoid fear in the US (then again they already were fairly paranoid). They have nearly paralysed the US aviation transport system (and nearly bankrupted it), caused a redneck warmongering illegally elected President to spend billions on a war (which will perpetuate terrorism) and numerous other side-effects............ Glad I don't live in the states! http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...pagen umber=2 |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... Likewise when the chances of meeting someone with a gun is remote do we worry about being armed? I would only worry if I was mixing with people who carry guns. As I don't mix with criminals its not an issue. Oh, you lock yourself up in your castle? What happens if you encounter a thug with a length of pipe on the way to the pub? Which, by the way, if far more likely to happen in London than in Norfolk, VA. Give him my wallet (never more than £20 in it). But its never happened yet. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Haven't the terrorists won? They have caused paranoid fear in the US (then again they already were fairly paranoid). They have nearly paralysed the US aviation transport system (and nearly bankrupted it), caused a redneck warmongering illegally elected President to spend billions on a war (which will perpetuate terrorism) and numerous other side-effects............ Glad I don't live in the states! We are very glad about that fact as well.... We already have our quota of passivist assholes. If your daddy or granddaddy saw the world the way you do we could have saved a bunch of American lives and you and the pussies from France would all be speaking German today. At least your current leadership has some balls and is willing to stand against EVIL. Unfortunately your neighbors across the channel have chosen to be insignificant, third-world countries that no longer matter in world affairs.... Let's see if you boys have the same attitude if one of those camel jockeys plows one of your beloved British Airways 747s into the Parliament Building. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What happened at PAE this Saturday | M | General Aviation | 1 | February 1st 05 08:02 AM |
What happened at PAE this Saturday | M | Owning | 1 | February 1st 05 08:02 AM |
Was the EFA coalition a mistake for the Brits? | John Cook | Military Aviation | 10 | August 27th 04 08:03 PM |
Whatever happened to ? | Anne | Military Aviation | 48 | May 26th 04 06:47 PM |
MARKET GARDEN ALL OVER AGAIN? WHAT THE HELL? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 8 | February 8th 04 09:37 AM |