![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... Bush's idiotic "amnesty" is generating scrutiny that's indicating the numbers (estimates only) might be rather LOW. A site called votefraud2000.com did a study right after the 2000 election, May.June, 2001 (unfortunately it's no longer online) that covered the illegal aliens as well as voting by dead people, people long since moved from the area, etc., etc. How many DO YOU think voted, and for whom? Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. The actions Mexico took in 1928 are the same ones they are still paying for. American oil companies blew every one of their wells in Mexico that year. |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? The actions Mexico took in 1928 are the same ones they are still paying for. American oil companies blew every one of their wells in Mexico that year. So how is Trotsky responsible, other than by merely "being there"? |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:SlfTb.207162$na.337411@attbi_s04... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:El6Tb.153717$Rc4.1208658@attbi_s54... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... Unless Kerry can get the millions (1.2M to 3.8M...so much for a 550K "margin") of illegal aliens back into the voting booth like Gore's team did. Would you care to cite any evidence for that assertion? Numbers from the INS as matched with Social service access around the country (particularly CA) which runs about 25% of IA's. Transpose that to voter roles. In all honesty, I had to read that twice to convince myself that you're not joking about the extrapolation to voter rolls. What you say reads like a parody of right-wing disinformation campaigns. Too bad multiple reads don't correspond to comprehension. You cite no evidence whatsoever about illegal aliens voting--not even a single documented instance! Instead, you mention a statistic about the percent of illegal aliens who use social services (which you cite no source for, but let's assume it's an accurate figure). You then propose to PRETEND that that statistic is a complete different statistic, concerning voter fraud instead of concerning social-service use. And for some reason, you call this pretense "transposing". It just goes to show that if you're willing to forego any semblance of intellectual rigor, you can convince yourself of pretty much anything you want to believe. I said they were ESTIMATES ****head. I also said the ESTIMATES raise QUESTIONS. No, that's NOT what you said. Go back and read your own initial post again--it's just one sentence long, and it's quoted in its entirety above. You spoke of getting "millions...of illegal aliens back in to the voting booth LIKE GORE'S TEAM DID" (empasis added). You simply asserted, as fact, that Gore's team actually got millions of illegal aliens to vote, when in reality you can't demonstrate EVEN A SINGLE INSTANCE. Instead, when called on it, you resort to pretending that a statistic about social-service use is a completely different statistic about fraudulent voting! (And now, true to form, you supplement your embarrassingly transparent speciousness with schoolyard name-calling.) Go get started in trying to steal the next election. Your contempt for basic standards of evidence, truth, and civility is breathtaking. --Gary |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh...there we go. The first obscenity in the thread...
mike regish "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... I said they were ESTIMATES ****head. I also said the ESTIMATES raise QUESTIONS. Some rigor you achieve in YOUR disinformation efforts. Go get started in trying to steal the next election. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But standard fare from the Bushies in these discussions...
mike regish "Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:%GrTb.208840$xy6.1070719@attbi_s02... Your contempt for basic standards of evidence, truth, and civility is breathtaking. --Gary |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Trotsky did almost as much damage to Mexico as he did to Russia. The actions Mexico took in 1928 are the same ones they are still paying for. American oil companies blew every one of their wells in Mexico that year. So how is Trotsky responsible, other than by merely "being there"? What would you like to know? |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Trotsky did almost as much damage to Mexico as he did to Russia. HOW?? The actions Mexico took in 1928 are the same ones they are still paying for. American oil companies blew every one of their wells in Mexico that year. So how is Trotsky responsible, other than by merely "being there"? What would you like to know? Why you're being so obtuse. |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Trotsky did almost as much damage to Mexico as he did to Russia. HOW?? By offering the equality he delivered. Under Trotsky's plan, 80% of all Mexican live in poverty. Just send your money to the Government and we will all be equal. (ie poor) |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Trotsky did almost as much damage to Mexico as he did to Russia. HOW?? By offering the equality he delivered. Under Trotsky's plan, 80% of all Mexican live in poverty. Actually, it's probably higher...but Trotsky never had contact with Mexican officials. If there's poverty there, it's caused by the people that ACCEPTED the "offer". For one thing, Mexico was impoverished long before Trotsky was even BORN. The basis of poverty is cultural, which accepts the ideology that leads to poverty. See Henry Hazlett's _Conquest of Poverty_. In the same vein, the American slide is not caused by the politicans, but by the people who ELECTED them. Just send your money to the Government and we will all be equal. (ie poor) Poor and stupid! :~) http://www.poorandstupid.com/chronicle.asp |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Trotski ruined the Mexican economy and it has been curse since then. What exactly did Trotsky have to do with the Mexican economy? Trotsky destroyed the Mexican economy with socialism. Trotsky, huh? Not Marx or whoever it was that imposed socialism on Mexico from within? Trotsky was there. So he was there...so what? Post hoc ergo propter hoc? Trotsky did almost as much damage to Mexico as he did to Russia. HOW?? By offering the equality he delivered. Under Trotsky's plan, 80% of all Mexican live in poverty. Actually, it's probably higher...but Trotsky never had contact with Mexican officials. Trotsky only needed contact with the people of Mexico to do his work. Now nearly everyone is "equal". If there's poverty there, it's caused by the people that ACCEPTED the "offer". For one thing, Mexico was impoverished long before Trotsky was even BORN. The basis of poverty is cultural, which accepts the ideology that leads to poverty. You are mistaken. At the time Trotsky arrived in Mexico, the peso was 1 troy oz of ,.999 pure silver; while the dollar required $1.18 to be an oz sterling. Today, even with three zeros shaved off the peso, you couldn't get a pack of gum for a peso. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Something Fishy with Kerry's being a "Hero" | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 16 | February 29th 04 02:16 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Enlisted pilots | John Randolph | Naval Aviation | 41 | July 21st 03 02:11 PM |