![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nauga" wrote in message ink.net... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Selling a homebuilt is not consistent with the regulatory advantages provided to those building their own airplane, that they intend to operate. Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. That is correct. Hired guns or building for the express purpose of resale are other matters altogether. Yes. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"nauga" wrote in message link.net...
Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. Uh oh. My buddy sold his RV-6 and I'm currently helping him with the RV-10 project. I don't think he's building it for "education or recreation". I'm pretty sure he's building it so that he'll have a kick-ass 4-place airplane to fly around in for less than 1/4 million dollars. I suppose the fallback position is that we're getting educated whether we intend to or not :-) John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Galban" wrote in message om... "nauga" wrote in message link.net... Nothing in the CFR about "intent to operate." If a person builds an airplane "for education or recreation" there is nothing in the CFR that prevents them from selling it. Uh oh. My buddy sold his RV-6 and I'm currently helping him with the RV-10 project. I don't think he's building it for "education or recreation". I'm pretty sure he's building it so that he'll have a kick-ass 4-place airplane to fly around in for less than 1/4 million dollars. I suppose the fallback position is that we're getting educated whether we intend to or not :-) As long as he is not building the airplane to sell, he is within the intent of the regulations. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would give it a horizontal brushed finish (or machine swirled) and
then have it etched and thick clear anodized. The etch time should be about 3 minutes to give a somewhat matte finish. On 6061 I would say to use a thin (.0005"-.0010") hard anodize which would give a nice medium gray color. On 2024 the results of hard anodize are less consistant so I recommend a thick standard anodize instead. At a thickness of .0005"+ the color will coume out a light gray with some goldish undertones. I think it looks good, but if you don't like it you still have about the best paint base you could imagine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument panel labelling options | John Galban | Home Built | 12 | November 18th 04 10:42 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
Aluminum instrument panel finish? | Richard Riley | Home Built | 31 | February 4th 04 02:09 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |