![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message
news:n%1%b.57665$4o.75853@attbi_s52... There is no requirement for the preceding aircraft to be off the runway for the next one to land. If you are in a single engine plane then the other plane has to be 3000 feet down the runway. See my other post. This has little or nothing to do with your "what, you wouldn't?" comment, nor my response to it. Pete |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Newps" wrote in message news:6wM_b.396854$na.764749@attbi_s04... What, you wouldn't? Why should I wait for someone to clear the runway if there is enough room for me to land behind him? The same reason you take more fuel than the bare minimum, that you clear obstacles by more than the bare minimum, and start your takeoff roll with more than the bare minimum of required runway remaining. Yes....but I think the point is, there is a spectrum of choices between "the bare minimum" and landing only on a clear runway, just as there's a spectrum of choices between "the bare minimum fuel" and a rule such as "only take off with full tanks". How much more runway than "the bare minimum" do you want during takeoff? 10%? 20%? 50%? 100%? At some point, most of us make operational choices that we're willing to accept some margin which is more than "the bare minimum", but less than twice what we need. Where that margin is lies with the individual pilot. Maybe it's 20% for me and 30% for you. Maybe vice versa. OK, now we're landing. How much more runway than "the bare minimum" do you want? Same operational choices apply. With me so far? So what's the difference between landing on a 3000 ft runway when you feel you really only need 1000 ft, vs landing on a 4000 ft runway with a plane 3000 ft down the runway taxiing off? Why reduce or eliminate your safety margin when there's absolutely no good reason to? Why do you feel there's "absolutely no good reason to"? Maybe there is... Cheers, Sydney |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Snowbird" wrote in message
om... Yes....but I think the point is, there is a spectrum of choices between "the bare minimum" and landing only on a clear runway He asked why he should wait. I told him. I never said there are never situations where one might not need to wait. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |