![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chad Irby" wrote in message om... ...you haven't read the actual rules yet, have you? Yup. The X-15 carried one guy (the rules for the X-Prize require that the craft has to be able to carry three, although it only has to have the equivalent ballast for the actual prize flight). So the significant thing about the X-Prize is that it requires a three-place craft? The two semi-qualifying (100 km+) X-15 flights took place over a month apart, in the #3 airframe. The point is the X-Prize does not require any new technology or capability. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Beede" wrote in message ... So now it's not "it's already been done," it's "it *could* have been already done?" Yes, manned suborbital flight has already been done. I think it's time to give up. Do what you must. The X-15 was a really cool plane, but it wouldn't qualify for the X-Prize even if it was operational today. It couldn't carry passengers. You're missing the point. The X-Prize does not require any new technology or capability. Manned suborbital spaceflight was accomplished and abandoned over forty years ago. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chad Irby" wrote in message om... It did, after some lower and slower flights. Not after the high-altitude flights, though, and the average gap between "hard" flights of the same airframes was a month and a half. That it didn't happen doesn't mean it wasn't possible. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zatatime" wrote in message news ![]() Yes it was..... You're mistaken. snip ["Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Somebody step on your tail? It really is going to be tough. If Rutan were attempting something easy, it wouldn't be worth all that attention, would it? What, are you trying to belittle his accomplishments or what he is trying to do? Just what is the point of the whole X-Prize competition anyway? I understand the requirements, but why do it all? The Rutan Voyager flight wasn't particularly useful either, but it was something that hadn't been done before. Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights. The idea is to prove that privately financed space travel is both feasible and reasonable. No government has managed to do what Rutan and the others are attempting. The prize has the additional advantage of attracting media attention so that, once it has been won, public interest in space tourism will be generated.] end snip If you're going to participate you need to learn to retain the responses you receive in a thread. What is outlined above not only demonstrates the significance of the X-Prize, but is also significant in demonstrating that you should be PLONK'ed by everyone in this forum! You're new here. If you're going to participate positively in these discussions you'll have to learn how to present a cogent argument. The question was; "Why is civilian suborbital flight a significant milestone?" Nothing in the material quoted above answers that question. I volunteer to lead the way. It doesn't appear you're capable of leading. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
between
"hard" flights of the same airframes was a month and a half. That it didn't happen doesn't mean it wasn't possible. Now it devovled to "coulda/woulda/shoulda" lmao Blll |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net Why? Just because. I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this before!" aspect to this. Of *course* men have flown in space. The only difference here - and the challenge of the task - is to do it with private money. Why is that a challenge? Because traditionally space travel has only been done at the expense of billions of dollars and huge government bureaucracies. The X-Prize is out to demonstrate that space travel doesn't have to remain the domain of governments. I personally like the idea of non-government entities in space. Why? "Just because," mostly. The fact that they're doing this without tax money is a bonus - and I'm generally supportive of space programs. My opinion is that the major advances in space technology from this point forward are going to come from the private sector. Space tourism is just the start. When companies figure out how to use microgravity profitably to manufacture crystals and special alloys, we'll start to see real advances and lower costs for space technology. Then perhaps manned exploration of the solar system. That's a l-o-n-g way in the future, though. I'll be lucky to see much of it fully realized in my lifetime. But I'm a dreamer - much like Rutan and the others vying for the X-Prize. The $10M pot isn't going to cover the costs of the attempt much less generate a profit. They're dreamers saying "why *not*." More power to them. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John T" wrote in message ws.com... Just because. I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this before!" aspect to this. Actually, based on responses in this thread there seems to be quite a bit of that! |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... Now it devovled to "coulda/woulda/shoulda" What is significant about a relaunch within two weeks? |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Now it devovled to "coulda/woulda/shoulda" What is significant about a relaunch within two weeks? ever heard of the time value of money? or perhaps "lets get those customers lined up like cattle" ? MOOOO em out ![]() face it...your either a troll or a person with no vision whatsoever.... Bllll |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... ever heard of the time value of money? Yup. Ever given a straight answer to a simple question? face it...your either a troll or a person with no vision whatsoever.... So killfile me. Many other ignorant jerks have. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there! | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Military Aviation | 150 | May 22nd 04 07:20 PM |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |