![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance
out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is a slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments. Also, a 1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I need a 1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and probably the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly 15 minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my checklist. You might try progressive lenses. I'm near-sighted, and after a few years of having more and more trouble with near vision (though always meeting the FAA standard) finally gave in and got progressive bifocals. It felt a little strange for the first couple of weeks, but now I automatically tilt my head as needed to see clearly. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I met w/ an optometrist yesterday who stated that progressive lenses aren't
recommended for pilots cuz they blur peripheral vision. She pointed me to either readers, classic "lined" bifocals, or bifocal contact lenses (a couple of varieties) to solve my problem of arms being too short to read charts. ![]() Bob "Barry" wrote in message news ![]() Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is a slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments. Also, a 1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I need a 1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and probably the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly 15 minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my checklist. You might try progressive lenses. I'm near-sighted, and after a few years of having more and more trouble with near vision (though always meeting the FAA standard) finally gave in and got progressive bifocals. It felt a little strange for the first couple of weeks, but now I automatically tilt my head as needed to see clearly. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "H.P." wrote: Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Ok. There's an AME named Kincade in the New Brunswick area who's an opthamalogist and pilot. He can definitely take care of this for you. I can recommend him as an eye doctor, but I would not recommend him as an AME. He has moved from his old office, or I would give you better location information. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "H.P." wrote in message ... Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is a slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments. Also, a 1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I need a 1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and probably the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly 15 minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my checklist. Sounds like trifocals, or bifocal reading glasses are what you need. If you find the right place, they will grind anything you want, or better said, any WHERE you want. I got a bifocal with only a small area at the top for distance vision, for working on things up close, where you can't tilt your head back to see what you need to see. Trifocals are a soon to be item for me, I fear. -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/2004 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will check him out, thanks.
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... "H.P." wrote: Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Ok. There's an AME named Kincade in the New Brunswick area who's an opthamalogist and pilot. He can definitely take care of this for you. I can recommend him as an eye doctor, but I would not recommend him as an AME. He has moved from his old office, or I would give you better location information. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:51:23 GMT, "H.P." wrote:
Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is a slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments. Also, a 1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I need a 1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and probably the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly 15 minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my checklist. A bit above my pay scale! Are you talking about the non-prescription spectacles sold in drugstores and the like? Are these glasses from an optometrist/occulist/whatever? Reading glasses generally won't help with the instrument panel. It's either distance vision or get trifocals. If your Rx is not radical, you can get progressive lenses with no line in them. If it is radical, like mine, then you can get "Smart Seg" bifocal that is actually a reading Rx on the bottom and intermediate on top. In fact, I got these glasses when I started flight training and repeatedldy found myself asking the instructor--this was in a Cessna, before I switched to the Cub--"Where's the altimeter?" Even before that time, I had a special pair of computer glasses, when I found that I was miserable reading a computer screen either with the top part of my glasses or the reading part. (But this information is only on the questionable assumption that I understand your post. If it applies, then you don't need an aeromedical specialist. Any good optometrist will fix you up.) Good luck! all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:40:26 GMT, "Bob Clough"
wrote: I met w/ an optometrist yesterday who stated that progressive lenses aren't recommended for pilots cuz they blur peripheral vision. Then "Smart Seg" is the way to go. You get a line, like any oldfashioned bifocal, but the side vision remains unchanged. I don't think she meant peripheral vision, though! Peripheral vision is always blurred! Perhaps she meant shooting a side glance out of the edge of the lens. It's true that with a conventional bifocal, the glass to the outside is the distance Rx. This is useful when you're looking down at something on the floor. Remember this: any change you make to your vision, whether it's glasses for the first time, or bifocals or progressive lenses, will become second nature in a very short time. (Just don't do what my father did, when he mounted onto a scafolding his first day at work after getting bifocals. He glanced down, stepped between two planks, and got a hernia recovering.) all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is an AME in Northern, NJ, who is an eye Dr.,
but I can't remember who... Might be Dr. Baron... John Price CFII/AGI/IGI http://home.att.net/~jm.price "H.P." wrote in message . .. I reside in Fairfield County, CT and train in Westchester County, NY. I'm looking for an optometrist or ophthalmologist who may specialize in treating vision correction for pilots. Anyone have a recommendation? Thanks in advance. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Went to:
http://ame.cami.jccbi.gov/ and pulled up the Eastern Region listing by city and state. http://ame.cami.jccbi.gov/AME%20Dire...aea_part_2.pdf This lists AMEs and their specialties, and if they are pilots ("P" before their name) The Ophthalmology specialty code is "Q". Found four Ophthalmologists nearby who are pilots. "H.P." wrote in message . .. I reside in Fairfield County, CT and train in Westchester County, NY. I'm looking for an optometrist or ophthalmologist who may specialize in treating vision correction for pilots. Anyone have a recommendation? Thanks in advance. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ask your optometrist about wearing ONE contact lens.
One eye does distance and the other follows it. One eye does instruments and the other follows it. Best thing that I ever saw - it works great. Tony In article , "H.P." wrote: Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but distance out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is a slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments. Also, a 1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I need a 1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and probably the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly 15 minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my checklist. "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:57:36 GMT, "H.P." wrote: I reside in Fairfield County, CT and train in Westchester County, NY. I'm looking for an optometrist or ophthalmologist who may specialize in treating vision correction for pilots. Anyone have a recommendation? Thanks in advance. If you have a particular problem, why don't you mention it? Lots of us have eye problems and have coped with them. We might be able to help even if we don't know an eye doc in Westchester County. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Piloting | 18 | March 4th 05 07:22 PM |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Owning | 14 | January 19th 05 10:17 PM |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Military Aviation | 9 | August 31st 04 11:01 PM |
SUV thing | Fastglasair | Home Built | 4 | July 12th 03 05:32 AM |
Big Bertha Thing blogs | Tony Lance | Piloting | 0 | July 2nd 03 11:58 PM |