A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

US pilots soon to report their skills?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 12th 04, 12:15 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

No, no one did. However, someone did twist their arm to get them to stay
well beyond their expected commitment.


who?

--
Bob Noel
Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal"
oh yeah baby.
  #32  
Old October 12th 04, 12:44 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
No, no one did. However, someone did twist their arm to get them to stay
well beyond their expected commitment.


who?


Your claim is that extensions to military tours of duty have all been
voluntary?

Uh, okay...


  #33  
Old October 12th 04, 12:44 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
No, no one did. However, someone did twist their arm to get them to stay
well beyond their expected commitment.


who?


Your claim is that extensions to military tours of duty have all been
voluntary?

Uh, okay...


  #34  
Old October 12th 04, 01:43 AM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You miss the point , the extension of military duty, IS THE MILITARY. When
you sign up it is there in black and white on the piece of paper the
volunteer signs. If they do not agree with it , then do not sign it , and do
not join. If you sign well then you belong to the military .

Patrick
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
No, no one did. However, someone did twist their arm to get them to

stay
well beyond their expected commitment.


who?


Your claim is that extensions to military tours of duty have all been
voluntary?

Uh, okay...




  #35  
Old October 12th 04, 01:43 AM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You miss the point , the extension of military duty, IS THE MILITARY. When
you sign up it is there in black and white on the piece of paper the
volunteer signs. If they do not agree with it , then do not sign it , and do
not join. If you sign well then you belong to the military .

Patrick
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
No, no one did. However, someone did twist their arm to get them to

stay
well beyond their expected commitment.


who?


Your claim is that extensions to military tours of duty have all been
voluntary?

Uh, okay...




  #36  
Old October 12th 04, 01:50 AM
Greg Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the legislation for the draft is always on the shelf, right next to the
plans to invade canada.

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

I have serious doubts about someone's sanity if they honestly think that
there is going to be a draft soon. Talk about radical


There is legislation for a draft, sponsored by (Democratic)
Congressman Charles Rangell. It has a very few (Democratic)
co-sponsors.

Recently the Republicans tried to bring the bill up for a vote, so as
to put paid to the (Democratic) rumors that Bush would bring back the
draft in a second term.

The Democrats accused the Republicans of playing politics.

Well, so it goes, in Disney World on the Potomac.

Just think about this for a minute: if there were a draft, who would
train the draftees? The entire (volunteer) U.S. Army would have to
stand down, be retrained, and then dispatched to build and staff the
training centers. It would take a year, minimum, and in the meantime
we would have no army for any other purpose.

This rumor has been very popular on campus for two years now. As soon
as the Good People realized that we were going to war in Iraq, they
began promising their students that they would soon be drafted. That
they were proved liars in 2002 hasn't stopped them from retreading the
same lies in 2004.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org



  #37  
Old October 12th 04, 01:50 AM
Greg Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the legislation for the draft is always on the shelf, right next to the
plans to invade canada.

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

I have serious doubts about someone's sanity if they honestly think that
there is going to be a draft soon. Talk about radical


There is legislation for a draft, sponsored by (Democratic)
Congressman Charles Rangell. It has a very few (Democratic)
co-sponsors.

Recently the Republicans tried to bring the bill up for a vote, so as
to put paid to the (Democratic) rumors that Bush would bring back the
draft in a second term.

The Democrats accused the Republicans of playing politics.

Well, so it goes, in Disney World on the Potomac.

Just think about this for a minute: if there were a draft, who would
train the draftees? The entire (volunteer) U.S. Army would have to
stand down, be retrained, and then dispatched to build and staff the
training centers. It would take a year, minimum, and in the meantime
we would have no army for any other purpose.

This rumor has been very popular on campus for two years now. As soon
as the Good People realized that we were going to war in Iraq, they
began promising their students that they would soon be drafted. That
they were proved liars in 2002 hasn't stopped them from retreading the
same lies in 2004.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org



  #38  
Old October 12th 04, 02:10 AM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So we'll still keep recruiting the poor and inner city youth, who we have no
other use for anyway. It's not like they'll ever be spending daddy's money
or anything.

mike regish

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...


This rumor has been very popular on campus for two years now. As soon
as the Good People realized that we were going to war in Iraq, they
began promising their students that they would soon be drafted. That
they were proved liars in 2002 hasn't stopped them from retreading the
same lies in 2004.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org



  #39  
Old October 12th 04, 02:10 AM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So we'll still keep recruiting the poor and inner city youth, who we have no
other use for anyway. It's not like they'll ever be spending daddy's money
or anything.

mike regish

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...


This rumor has been very popular on campus for two years now. As soon
as the Good People realized that we were going to war in Iraq, they
began promising their students that they would soon be drafted. That
they were proved liars in 2002 hasn't stopped them from retreading the
same lies in 2004.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org



  #40  
Old October 12th 04, 02:12 AM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

mike regish

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
He would blame
it on the Republicans, of course.


And it would be the republicans fault for dragging us into this ********.
Afghanistan is NOT spelled I-R-A-Q.


The only bill currently before Congress to
reinstate the draft is sponsored by Democrats. Democrats have a long
history
of proposing such measures, including drafts for 'peaceful' purposes such
as
the Peace Corps. This is in keeping with the historical and philosophical
origins of the Democratic Party, which was founded to protect the rights
of
slave owners and to represent slave states. After all, if everyone is the
slave of the US government (which they frequently allege), then what is
wrong with private ownership of humans?


You really are a couple beers short of a six pack.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality Chip Jones Piloting 125 October 15th 04 07:42 PM
"Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" Jim Cummiskey Piloting 86 August 16th 04 06:23 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
Report: Sedatives found in pilot's blood Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 15th 03 11:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.