A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Female pilot accident rates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old October 26th 04, 03:30 PM
WaltBJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FWIW I trained women pilots transitioning to the L1011 while working
at Eastern. Without exception they were meticulous pilots who studied
hard and really learned the airplane. I also knew Betty Skelton - she
was a 'pretty good' woman pilot (understatement for effect).
Walt BJ
  #32  
Old October 26th 04, 03:38 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C Kingsbury" wrote in message
ink.net...
There was an NTSB study within the past four years that looked at this
question. I'm going on memory here, but the aggregate accident rates were
not different in a statistically significant way. But there was a

suggestion
that the causes of accidents were somewhat different across the two

groups.
Women, it seemed, were more likely to be involved in accidents owing to
mishandling the aircraft, while men were more likely to make serious
judgment errors.


I think that one you may have backwards. I recall some tests of male-female
pilots recently. The findings were that women handled the aircraft better
(more precisely, more smoothly), but men were better at emergency
procedures.





  #33  
Old October 26th 04, 04:04 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Roger Long" wrote in message .. .
OK troll, I'll bite.


Why'd you bother?

-----------
  #34  
Old October 26th 04, 04:10 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Friedrich Ostertag" wrote in message ...

Overall you can pull just the same arguments used generally in "women
driver" discussions.


But have you noticed that this phrase is hardly heard anymore?
I wonder if it's because women have become so much better drivers
in the last 15 years. I'm surprise you weren't chided by the
surprisingly huge number of the spineless set that hang out here
for using that phrase.

----------
  #35  
Old October 26th 04, 04:12 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Natalie wrote in message om...
NoPoliticsHere wrote:

Of course if you enumerate all the crashes involving male pilots


Ron, ever hear of the word 'disproportionate'? I used it in my post.

--------------
  #36  
Old October 26th 04, 04:22 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NoPoliticsHere wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote in message om...

NoPoliticsHere wrote:

Of course if you enumerate all the crashes involving male pilots



Ron, ever hear of the word 'disproportionate'? I used it in my post.


Yep, and you were wrong as well. You take 5 crashes out of a sample
set of 5 crashes you heard about involving woman. That's no more of
a representable sample than my "pages" comment.

It's hard to be really proportionate when you pull samples out of your
ass.
  #39  
Old October 26th 04, 04:38 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Somerset wrote in message . ..

After reading this, I can understand why you post anonymously. Your last
sentence is particulaly obnoxoius!


Maybe he just meant that it was better that this woman be permanently
put out of commission (considering her record, but still being allowed
to fly), rather than crash onto the deck at some time, killing dozens
of personnel in the process. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

---------
  #40  
Old October 26th 04, 04:42 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Somerset wrote in message . ..

After reading this, I can understand why you post anonymously. Your last
sentence is particulaly obnoxoius!


A little anonymity can be a good thing Jay. Why would anyone use their real
name in a place like this, unless they're selling something? Anonymity
is more likely to bring honesty, as far as inner opinions. Most people
who post with real names make sure they walk the line they've been told
to walk.

------------
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? Larry Dighera Piloting 72 April 30th 04 11:28 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.