![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CZ" wrote in message . com...
This is the "MIR" for the famous Kara Hultgreen crash during a landing attempt at USS Abraham Lincoln on October 25th, 1994. http://www.panix.com/~baldwin/hultgreen_mir.txt Thanks, I read the whole thing before posting to the thread. I skipped some of the formalities, but I think it's clear what led to the crash. How many female F-14 pilots are there? ---------- |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message
om... (Rick Durden) wrote in message om... There is very little data available on the subject, largely because there are so few women who are pilots (about 6% of all pilots, a lower proportion than that of professional pilots). Which goes along with my observation that women are involved in more than 6% of accidents, at least the ones that make the news. No, that isn't your "observation". Rather, it's your unsupported speculation. You listed seven crashes spanning thirteen years! Do you actually believe those seven constitute "more than 6% of accidents", or even 6% of "the ones that make the news", over the past thirteen years? --Gary |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NoPoliticsHere" wrote in message om... (Schlomo Lipchitz) wrote in message ... Delta Airlines had a couple of female pilots sitting at home getting full pay - one of which I flew with personally. They were fired for incompetence. But when they threatened to sue for sexual discrimination, Delta opted to just pay them rather that go through the negative publicity. And that's a fact Jack! But schlomo, can't you see that the PC spoonfed milksops here aren't interested in facts like this? Such things are not allowed on their radar screens, at least publicly. They behave as told. As a proud fascist right-wing capitalist pig, what I'd like to know is, what's yer point? We've already allowed them to fly planes, drive cars, own property, even vote, so what precisely is it you would like to see done about the scourge of chick pilots? -cwk. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tien Dao" wrote in message
.. . I would like to see the research not for the purpose of NOT hiring women or the like, but the see what differences in error making actually exists between the two sexes. Maybe both sexes can learn from their genetic predispositions and be on the look out more carefully. Even if there were genetic predispositions of the sort you're speculating about, I don't see how it would help to be on the lookout as you suggest. Wouldn't it make more sense for each of us to ascertain (with the help of our instructors and examiners) our own individual strengths and weaknesses, rather than pretending that we each had a skill set that matches the statistical mean for our gender? By analogy, there is a genetic correlation between gender and height. But knowing this correlation doesn't help us to be on the lookout for what size clothing we should buy. You want to buy clothing that fits you, not clothing that fits the average person of your gender. --Gary |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
on the hole, women have had far less stick time than men.
Please let it be noted that I do not subscribe to that view, and I would take great exception to the person that applied that to me! Hehehehehe. _____________ José Herculano |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
The sex of the pilot makes no difference. Only to those who think it does, and unfortunately, there are still plenty of those people around. Ever notice, in some news reports of incidents or accidents, that when it's a male pilot, they talk about him simply as "the pilot"; when it's a woman, they are compelled to say, "the female pilot", as if that changes the story? One sentiment in this thread sort of explains why this topic even exists -- a sentence that began with: "We've *allowed* them [women] to ..." drive cars, vote, etc., etc., etc. Perhaps tongue-in-cheek, but nevertheness, it is still very much a prevailing attitude, even in today's supposedly enlightened times. Example: Man tells woman, "Listen to what your airplane is telling you." Woman later says, "I'm not flying this airplane, it is SHOUTING maintenance issues loud and clear." Man replies: "Nice that you're so connected with the airplane that you hear it talking, but it's JUST a machine!" Second example: Woman flies an airplane and squawks unresponsive nosewheel steering. She is told it is "within normal range." Man flies same airplane next, comes back and squawks unresponsive nosewheel steering. The plane is then grounded and the nosewheel steering is replaced. Third example: Woman flies airplane and describes excessively uneven fuel burn between left and right fuel tanks--response from male airplane owner: "Just fly with the other wing lower." There are still many in aviation who don't take women seriously, and when an incident or accident occurs involving a woman, are quick to draw unfounded conclusions that sex of the pilot was a factor. Too bad, with as far as other things have evolved, *some* men's attitudes about women are still in the Dark Ages. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
José Herculano wrote:
on the hole, women have had far less stick time than men. Please let it be noted that I do not subscribe to that view, and I would take great exception to the person that applied that to me! Ok, that obviously didn't come out right! What I MEANT was... Oh, never mind. No use digging in even deeper! |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
"I skipped the formalities" = "I couldn't understand it on the best day I ever had." Here's what it said: ----snipped---- Your rough translation of course, not theirs. But the big noticeable thing about your post is your VERY selective cutting and pasting. I thought about doing some cutting and pasting of my own from the report but decided why bother. Anyone can read the report for themselves. One does not have to be a military pilot to clearly see that MP was the primary cause of this accident. Her responses and general incompetence were the primary cause. And there was of course the fact that this was her **7th** crash! Which is another little tidbit you chose to ignore. IMO, you're just another PC milksop. ----------- |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C Kingsbury wrote:
As a proud fascist right-wing capitalist pig, what I'd like to know is, what's yer point? We've already allowed them to fly planes, drive cars, own property, even vote, so what precisely is it you would like to see done about the scourge of chick pilots? That's easy. No special allowances for gender. Female pilots should be held to the same standards as the guys. If that means two females in one cockpit, so be it, but make it equitable. -------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | April 30th 04 11:28 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |